Author Topic: Schoolgirlangel - Holborn  (Read 2135 times)


26 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6054362) (22 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by johnny34]

Offline Ron89

External Link/Members Only

Straightforward to book and saw her based on the reviews on here, keen to get my hands on a chunky Asian which is a rarity. Particularly, I was willing to pay this rate based on her being moderately attractive, as per reviewers descriptions. However, upon seeing her, I was very underwhelmed with her appearance. She’s no stunner or anything resembling good looking in my opinion. But it is what it is, I liked her personality, she’s young and British so I decided to stay.

I didn’t go for kissing so can’t comment on that, pushed her down to her knees and she gobbled up my dick, it was impressive. Gagging, sloppy, she was enjoying herself that’s for sure. She’s very submissive and does exactly what you tell her to. Moderate facefucking ensued and it was turning into a decent punt. She’s willing in terms of sex, enthusiastic and I actually made her cum a couple of times which was a nice ego boost. I can tell when it’s real and when it’s just acting and she definitely doesn’t fake anything. Her body was very firm, I prefer a softer frame so didn’t really enjoy the sex a great deal.

All in all, due to looks and rate this gets a neutral. She tries hard to please and the service is good but when you’re that pricey I can’t look past the aesthetics of what’s on offer face and body wise. London offers a lot better.

Offline doyouforgetit

She’s perfectly attractive. You’re just not used to a girl who isn’t caked in makeup. Since other reviewers have noted she doesn’t wear makeup or have a snazzy haircut and you have presumably read this, IMO it’s unfair to give her a neutral when she gave a good service.

Offline Ron89

She’s perfectly attractive. You’re just not used to a girl who isn’t caked in makeup. Since other reviewers have noted she doesn’t wear makeup or have a snazzy haircut and you have presumably read this, IMO it’s unfair to give her a neutral when she gave a good service.
She’s not attractive.

Offline Shades

She gets a neutral, while this one gets a positive, with a lot of things that I would have definately deemed a negative.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=304512.0

Offline doyouforgetit

She’s not attractive.

In your opinion. Not in the opinion of others. Again, I suspect if she were to use all the beauty treatments all the other girls use then there’s a good chance you would say she’s attractive. She’s got good features but you’re not used to the natural look. I think it’s refreshing that there’s a girl who does things differently to the rest.

Online alabama1

She’s perfectly attractive. You’re just not used to a girl who isn’t caked in makeup. Since other reviewers have noted she doesn’t wear makeup or have a snazzy haircut and you have presumably read this, IMO it’s unfair to give her a neutral when she gave a good service.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. You find her attractive, the OP didn't. Neither of you are lying.  :unknown:

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. You find her attractive, the OP didn't. Neither of you are lying.  :unknown:


Not the done thing, white knighting and questioning another punters review score, the OP has been honest about the service and takes a few for the team, his rating, his opinion, we all find different things attractive. :unknown:
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline doyouforgetit

I am obviously just giving an opinion. Of course, I know it’s subjective. It might help others to know many find her attractive but she’s got a no makeup natural look which is not for everyone.

Why is that not the done thing? Such a noble code... we righteous brothers!

Offline Ron89

I am obviously just giving an opinion. Of course, I know it’s subjective. It might help others to know many find her attractive but she’s got a no makeup natural look which is not for everyone.

Why is that not the done thing? Such a noble code... we righteous brothers!
She’d be bad even with a full face of make up. Anyway, glad my review adds balance as I’m sure others would be disappointed.

Online SomTumFucker

OP’s description of her looks mirror mine as reviewed. But her willingness to please and personality made it a positive for me.