Author Topic: Scarlett - Boudoir Babes, Deansgate  (Read 1930 times)


4 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5843220) (2 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by NigelF]

Offline NigelF

Links:
Scarlett- External Link/Members Only
AW - External Link/Members Only

Price: £80 for 30 mins (including £10 for OWO and £10 for "FK").

Looks: Here are her photos only on the Boudoir Babes site:
Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Here are the photos on that site and her AW:
Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Here's the remaing photos currently on the main page of her AW profile (she has more pics in her gallery):
Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

All of the above photos give a misleading/flattering impression of her size and body. I don't think any are edited but some are likely out of date (particularly the ones only on the Boudoir site) and others are just cleverly posed. For example when I saw her she wore the red lingerie shown in the final pic above (from her AW) and it looks like that was a fairly recent photo and it's possible she's not even sucking in her stomach but regardless, that photo doesn't show everything and gives a misleading impression.

Boudoir Babes and her AW profile claim she's a size 12 - this is a lie. She's definitely not a size 12. At the very least she's on the large end of size 14. Given her positive reviews (I think she has about 3 - 2 from last year as part of some gang bangs and one very recent solo), I found her body to be disappointing. There was quite a lot of fat and flab everywhere. Her arse was big and round, a little flabby but still decent firmess and I definitely enjoyed it.

Boudoir says 34B tits (nothing mentioned on her AW) and this seems about right, certainly in regard to her her cup size. Her tits are disappointingly small given her large size though and they were also lacking in firmness but nothing bad just disappointing for someone who claims to be a teen. Both her nipples are pierced plus she has a tongue piercing and a piercing high on her chest (in the middle, just below her neck).

Last week her AW profile said she's 18 but that's obviously bollocks as she's been working for over a year. Even Boudoir say she's 19 and now her AW profile says that too. I don't think she looks 19 (although her weight doesn't help) but I would peg her at early 20s.

She has a cute/pretty face but would look far better without the extra fat plumping it up, as such she was a little disappointing in this regard too compared to what I was expecting.

Service: Upon entering the room she requested full payment (a bad sign, especially in a parlour albeit here the reception doesn't directly take any from you). I asked for DFK and she said that was a tenner extra. Normally I refuse to pay extra for it because it's almost always crap (those who don't ask for extra are often far better or at least just as good - including in parlours) but I thought this time it might be worth it.

Of course I was wrong, it was barely FK and it was piss poor. There were very occasional flicks of the tongue but it was mostly lip kissing of which mostly brief and numerous times avoided altogether. It was very disjointed and extremely annoying. There's no way to describe paying a tenner extra for it other than to say it was a barefaced con (although of course that's not uncommon in parlours).

OWO was very good with a variety of techniques used and occasional DT moments. She used lots of spit (but slowly/sensually spitting on my cock) and engaged in a hell of a lot of eye contact.

Sex was mostly enthusiastic and again involved good eye contact. Some dirty talk too, not bad but not that well-judged or delivered IMO.

She didn't have a bad attitude but there was something a bit off with it. Also, despite being fine with fingering and RO, she didn't seem too keen on being touched a lot or getting very close, as such, despite me asking for GFE at the start (which she agreed to deliver) it definitely wasn't that. To be clear though she definitely wasn't as bad the worst kinds of WGs in this regard and it wasn't a massive deal but it was just about noticeable and she was worse than most parlour girls in this regard.

She was a clock watcher and did rush a bit with her actions although I got my full time.

She did have a gangbang a few hours before I saw her (unfortunately she was unavailable prior) so this might have affected the meet but actually I think all or at least most of the issues I had were nothing to do with that. The only thing I think might've been related was that during sex she was initially a bit restrictive but that didn't last long as she soon warmed up.

Overall: Not a bad punt but it was disappointing (and overpriced for a parlour punt). I considered giving her a negative but due to the positive aspects, she scrapes a neutral. I get the impression she's fairly new to solo meets so she might improve in the future (although that is usually rare) but I wouldn't consider seeing her again unless she gets numerous positives and loses some weight.
« Last Edit: August 29, 2020, 12:03:20 am by NigelF »

Online Kool Keef

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,828
  • Likes: 64
  •  
  • Reviews: 198
Saw her myself recently, left disappointed.
Very misleading photos, poor BJ, absolutely bang average parlour punt, definitely won't return.

Offline Cryton123

I saw her at a party a while back. I found her extremely attractive facially but agree with your description of her body. She’s considerably bigger than her pictures suggest.