Author Topic: LilSexyLexi5 - Kilmarnock  (Read 6552 times)


2 review(s) for LilSexyLexi5 (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline dthompson88

Never got past the booking stage, so not a review as such, but anyway, new profile popped up on AdultWork saw her rates and thought that's a bit steep, but common these days. After looking at her snapchat filtered pics, I thought, fuck it.
 Emailed her, got her number and managed to get her to send me an unfiltered pic for verification purposes, slim bod average tits, nice enough face, obviously as a courtesy I complimented her looks after receiving the pic, but she looked nice but nothing particularly outstanding. I mention all this because this bit was the deal breaker- asked her just to verify her rates; texts back "£80 or £100 for half hour" Alarm bells went off, enquired further turns out this chancer intended to charge £80/30 min for a stripped back service of a "little bit of oral and sex, mainly handjob" (!) for full gfe (as if it was something extra and not standard) it's £100 FOR A HALF HOUR. Fucking chancer, even tried to give me a sob story about having a disabled kid, call me a cynic but seems to be quite common practice these days.

External Link/Members Only



Anyway finally bit the bullet and booked up with WG in glasgow for Tuesday will post review then.


« Last Edit: April 19, 2019, 05:47:47 pm by dthompson88 »

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Never got past the booking stage, so not a review as such, but anyway, new profile popped up on AdultWork saw her rates and thought that's a bit steep, but common these days. After looking at her snapchat filtered pics, I thought, fuck it.
 Emailed her, got her number and managed to get her to send me an unfiltered pic for verification purposes, slim bod average tits, nice enough face, obviously as a courtesy I complimented her looks after receiving the pic, but she looked nice but nothing particularly outstanding. I mention all this because this bit was the deal breaker- asked her just to verify her rates; texts back "£80 or £100 for half hour" Alarm bells went off, enquired further turns out this chancer intended to charge £80/30 min for a stripped back service of a "little bit of oral and sex, mainly handjob" (!) for full gfe (as if it was something extra and not standard) it's £100 FOR A HALF HOUR. Fucking chancer, even tried to give me a sob story about having a disabled kid, call me a cynic but seems to be quite common practice these days.

External Link/Members Only
According to what you've said, you never made an actual booking (day, date etc confirmed)... Therefore it cant be classed as a review...  :hi:

Offline dthompson88

 :hi: Sorry forgot to mention it was booked for noon today (until she decided to throw on an extra £20 for no apparent reason.)

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
:hi: Sorry forgot to mention it was booked for noon today (until she decided to throw on an extra £20 for no apparent reason.)
Well, that should have been the salient point, in relation to the thread/post...  ;)

Offline dthompson88

Sorry it was a bit of a ramble. But aye, that's the point I made (poorly).  :hi:


And I see, as of today, she's advertising gfe is extra, but she doesn't tell you that she considers "GFE" as what we'd say is standard (suck n fuck) service.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2019, 07:06:23 pm by dthompson88 »

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
:hi: Sorry forgot to mention it was booked for noon today (until she decided to throw on an extra £20 for no apparent reason.)
In that case it should stand as a review(if you had mentioned it)... Maybe someone, with the ability, could move it back for you, if that's what you want?

Offline DoctorSalchicha

This is very confusing to me, you haven't meet her yet and you will next Tuesday?

Also, the profile is confusing, she have a list of likes and then she is charging £20.00 extra for GFE?... but she have already a list of likes that she will supposedly perform for £150.00 an hour? She need to be more clear on what services she consider "GFE"...

I think I'll hold until you meet her and update this as a proper review, as for now it's not a review.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2019, 11:35:44 pm by DoctorSalchicha »

Offline mcphud

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Moe confusing than a confusing thing on National Confusing Day! You didnae meet her, slag her off & give her a positive? :dash:
Banned reason: Previously banned (Buddie)
Banned by:

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
WTF is happening here! ... This review was a NEG, was moved to regional, and has since been moved back and is now a POS... :crazy:

What rating should this review be OP? ... I'm guessing a Neg?

Dorkytorky

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is very confusing to me, you haven't meet her yet and you will next Tuesday?

Also, the profile is confusing, she have a list of likes and then she is charging £20.00 extra for GFE?... but she have already a list of likes that she will supposedly perform for £150.00 an hour? She need to be more clear on what services she consider "GFE"...
I reckon the question is more like WTF do you get for the £150/hr? Without the £20 extra.

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,154
  • Likes: 696
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
WTF is happening here! ... This review was a NEG, was moved to regional, and has since been moved back and is now a POS... :crazy:

What rating should this review be OP? ... I'm guessing a Neg?

Sorted now, I think OP saying "so not a review as such" caused the confusion. As long as his booking was agreed ( which he has now confirmed) it's a legitimate review.

Offline BaronVonProdger

I still don't understand, its not a review of anything, and am sure I've seen these pics somewhere else on another profile.  :wacko: :bomb:

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
I still don't understand, its not a review of anything, and am sure I've seen these pics somewhere else on another profile.  :wacko: :bomb:
The way I'm reading it is, he's made a booking (which he's mentioned in a post after the review), then in further comms she's upped the price by 20 quid from 80hh to 100hh, effectively messing him around, so he's not bothered/cancelled...

Could be wrong, but that's how I'm interpreting it anyway, even if it is all a bit confused  :wacko:... It therefore fits the criteria to warrant a review, me thinks... Phew!!!...  :D

Edit: Just stick to posting in regional OP... Ma heads Fucking mangled...  :wacko: :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: April 20, 2019, 09:59:22 am by Clattypats »

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,702
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 115
Anyway finally bit the bullet and booked up with WG in glasgow for Tuesday will post review then.

I fear for you in the big city Thomo...could be an overwhelming experience...may your god be with you :angelgirl:



P.S. I hope you haven't booked an auld fat minger.

Offline Boinky

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,578
  • Likes: 5
  •  
  • Reviews: 23
daviemac
Moderator.




Ooooh. We have mods now, fear their wrath.   :P

Offline BaronVonProdger

The way I'm reading it is, he's made a booking (which he's mentioned in a post after the review), then in further comms she's upped the price by 20 quid from 80hh to 100hh, effectively messing him around, so he's not bothered/cancelled...

Could be wrong, but that's how I'm interpreting it anyway, even if it is all a bit confused  :wacko:... It therefore fits the criteria to warrant a review, me thinks... Phew!!!...  :D

Edit: Just stick to posting in regional OP... Ma heads Fucking mangled...  :wacko: :sarcastic:

Well am glad someone understands whats happening, this review is what I would write after four glasses of Johnnie Walker black. :wacko:

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Well am glad someone understands whats happening, this review is what I would write after four glasses of Johnnie Walker black. :wacko:
Well a tanned a half bottle of voddy before I read it.... Made total sense to me!...  :sarcastic: :D

Offline Edinburghdanny

She looks hot to me. So it’s the girl in the pix but prices vary?

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,154
  • Likes: 696
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I still don't understand, its not a review of anything, and am sure I've seen these pics somewhere else on another profile.  :wacko: :bomb:

The OP made a booking with the prossie at her advertised rate of £80 1/2 hour which she agreed to, during comms to confirm she raised her prices, so OP left a justified negative review. She has since altered her profile to reflect the price differential.

Under the rules a booking does not need to take place, if an appointment is agreed either by txt, email or verbally a review can be left.   :hi:

Offline dthompson88

That's her just texted me out of the blue about 'special offers' - £10 off using a strap on (!) Bargain  :dash: :dash: :dash:
And cheers for making the review clearer Daviemac  :hi:
« Last Edit: June 14, 2019, 07:47:04 pm by dthompson88 »


Offline dthompson88

Randomly texted me again today, to say she's available despite what her profile says.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

Jokingly asked her why lockdown rules don't apply to her and she hurls back with a lot of bullshit and abuse.

Pure nutter.


Offline bobbydaz69

She’s a really skinny lass and you can almost get your two hands around her waist, nice if that is your thing but her looks are greatly let down by her ‘row of condemned houses’ (teeth). The rates she charges are often on special but after one visit I have her on my ‘no other bugger available’ list. A few screws loose for sure.

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Randomly texted me again today, to say she's available despite what her profile says.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

Jokingly asked her why lockdown rules don't apply to her and she hurls back with a lot of bullshit and abuse.

Pure nutter.
Just block her... Job done!

Offline youngatheart

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 612
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
Randomly texted me again today, to say she's available despite what her profile says.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

Jokingly asked her why lockdown rules don't apply to her and she hurls back with a lot of bullshit and abuse.

Pure nutter.

She must be fucking desperate if she waited since JUNE OF LAST YEAR to text you back !!!
Banned reason: Fuck you cunt
Banned by: Head1

Offline dthompson88

Was checking through AW there, saw this one had put her profile back up.

Someone had mentioned she was a barebacker on the Avoidance thread, just thought I'd add; look at her only available pic; bb confirmed.

External Link/Members Only


Offline Uncle Buck

Was checking through AW there, saw this one had put her profile back up.

Someone had mentioned she was a barebacker on the Avoidance thread, just thought I'd add; look at her only available pic; bb confirmed.

External Link/Members Only

That could be her partner/ boyfriend/ husband I guess as her profile does stipulate that unprotected sex is not on the menu.

Offline mickey1967


I had the same nightmare comms a while back with this girl the original reviewer had, she's a complete waste of time, one to avoid.

Offline dthompson88

That could be her partner/ boyfriend/ husband I guess as her profile does stipulate that unprotected sex is not on the menu.

This is just me personally speaking, but I still view that as barebacking; she's still having unprotected sex while working as an escort. The partner knows and and openly participates & promotes her as such, can never really tell what the deal is there.

What I see there, is a WG having unprotected sex, it's always best to err on the side of caution.

Offline dthompson88

I had the same nightmare comms a while back with this girl the original reviewer had, she's a complete waste of time, one to avoid.
+1

Not only bad with comms, she texted me back a couple of times, months after the first attempt fell through, so if you used a phone for comms, I would block her number.  Definite issues there.