Fake boobs are remarkably unerotic, ive noticed that when i come across them, in situ, i dont even want to touch them, otherwise glad you are using your free time well.
Each to his own, and generally I agree. However, I would contend that fake boobs CAN be erotic and look natural but the level of visual and tactile pleasure derived depends on a number of variables.
1. How much breast tissue was there before the op. When a woman has not much to begin with, the implant is more obviously fake. This can be alleviated to some degree by placement under the chest muscle, but the implant is being inserted under muscle, not fatty tissue, so the tactile feeling is firmer than a natural breast.
2. How much skin was there before the op. A woman whose breasts have been enlarged due to breastfeeding might have naturally stretched skin which will better accomodate an implant.
3. The type of implant used - saline filled implants tend to crease and ripple more than silicone gel filled ones.
4. The size of implant used. Unfortunately, there is a tendency for women, influenced by what they see in the media, to go for larger than looks natural on their frame, and most surgeons will acquiesce with the patients wishes.
5. The surgeon. The majority of breast augmentation ops in the U.K. are performed by surgeons who are members of the Royal College of Surgeons but not members of the aptly-named BAAPS (British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons). These operations, it seems to me, are done almost on a production-line basis. As for the women who go to Eastern Europe to have the op - it's a big gamble.
6. How the patient's skin heals - some patients are more prone to scarring.
As in anything, you get what you pay for, and different patients can get different results, regardless.
My wife was unhappy with breast tissue loss due to breastfeeding our countless children. She's lucky that she has amazingly elastic skin - not a single stretch mark on her body and always got her flat tummy back, but that's also due to her not eating like a pig and her dancer's physique. She had her boobs done by a top Harley Street surgeon 12 years ago. (He also does reconstruction after mastectomies.) Silicone gel filled, inserted through the inframammary fold - chose a size of implant in keeping with her frame. The result looked and still looks and feels totally natural - but then the implant is under a reasonable amount of her own breast tissue. The scars faded and are virtually unnoticeable. No loss of nipple sensitivity. She's had a few mammagrams since the op (normal NHS breast cancer screening) and the nurses every time have said they can't believe they're not natural.
