Seems like its between Platinum Cindy or MissSalacious or Michelle Independent I havent seen any of them.
Any recommendations?
also what is so great about those three girls? they seem average to me, I would appreciate if you guys can explain.
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Yet another vague “best girl in London” thread/question asked by a newbie (btw lately in this forum there is an increasing frequency of such posts) although in this case the actual question is also considering 3 particular cases.
But let me tell you this: First even the most vivid punter can only himself see a subset of all London WGs, so each of us can only recommend girls based on our own relatively limited punting experience (even if someone has seen 500 London WGs it is still a small fraction, perhaps 10%, of all WGs in London). Second, even if someone could theoretically see all of them his conclusion about the “best” would be subjective to his own personal taste. Third, there is the cost aspect: Are you asking for the “best” WG charging £80-£120ph or the “best” regardless of price? And finally, fourth, are you looking for particular services (e.g. deep french kissing, anal) which if not offered it’s a deal breaker or are you just looking for a basic "service package" given beautiful looks and superb delivery of the available services?
Also I disagree with your comment that Michelle Independent looks “average”. If we measure attractiveness starting from worst and going to the best looking as (a) “ugly”, (b) “below mediocre”, (c) “mediocre”, (d) “OK”, (e) “cute”, (f) “pretty”, (g) “beautiful”, (h) “gorgeous” and (i) “rare beauty”, then Michelle can be considered as pretty/beautiful. Most girls charging up to £100ph are either “OK”, “cute” or “pretty”. So even if by “average” you meant average amongst the escorts at that price then you are also wrong as Michelle is at least one class above of what is considered as the “average” of this price range. And that is primarily why she is regarded as so good VFM (aside of course because of her service being excellent).
Anyway if you are looking for very good value for money girls (i.e. very good looks, excellent service and cost up to £120 per hour) then below are 10 tried and tested overall excellent choices (listed in alphabetical order - not by performance or looks):
1. Bambi.x (1h: £100 2h: £200):
External Link/Members Only2. CLAUDIA___(1h: £120, 2h:£200):
External Link/Members Only3. Demi (outcalls only – 1h: £125, 2h £240):
External Link/Members Only4. Hailey.x (1h £100, 2h £200):
External Link/Members Only 5. jennifer_pussy (1h:£100 2h:£200):
External Link/Members Only6. Spicy Julia (1h: £110, 2h: £210):
External Link/Members Only7. Stunning Julie (1h 120 2h: £200):
External Link/Members Only8. Michelle Independent (1h £100 2h £200):
External Link/Members Only9. ~Hot Monica~ (1h £100 2h £200):
External Link/Members Only10. Passionate_Naomi (1h £100 2h £200):
External Link/Members OnlyIf cost is not an issue then I can recommend you an entire catalogue of AW girls, agency girls and pornstars.