Author Topic: Heavenly Hannah croydon  (Read 6794 times)


6 review(s) for Heavenly Hannah Xx (5 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Davey Dykes]

Offline Unistudent

Realised I need to start posting reviews instead of lurking
 Comms were easy, called her on the day and arranged meeting for 1 hr for 120

 2 pops in the hour, dfk owo and rimming and its the girl in the profile.
External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: February 29, 2020, 09:43:44 am by Unistudent »

Offline Wozel

This review must have taken you ages to write

Offline Unistudent

This review must have taken you ages to write
Better than not posting in the first place I guess

Offline ratedj

Better than not posting in the first place I guess

I disagree. If you're only going to make a half-hearted attempt then may as well not bother.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,299
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Better than not posting in the first place I guess

Wrong.

Please provide sufficient information to avoid being considered a tout including how you assessed the photos are of her as she does not appear to have any distinguishing marks.

Offline PLeisure

Realised I need to start posting reviews instead of lurking
  :sarcastic:   Almost five years of asking questions and this is what you can manage??    :unknown:
Go back and get some education: External Link/Members Only  :hi:

Offline unus669


Offline xiǎo lóng

Wrong.

Please provide sufficient information to avoid being considered a tout including how you assessed the photos are of her as she does not appear to have any distinguishing marks.

OP, could also comment on the location, please?...nearest rail station, public landmark, etc.

You should provide enough intel to confirm/challenge the aw profile (her quoted stats, for example)

Basically, try and answer the questions which you would ask, before you engaged with the SP

Hope this help!

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,593
  • Likes: 130
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Wrong.

Please provide sufficient information to avoid being considered a tout including how you assessed the photos are of her as she does not appear to have any distinguishing marks.

To be fair, LLP, a tout would've made much more of an effort. It's so generic and devoid of specifics or detail that I'm more likely to believe he just made it up to improve his stats.

Back to the SP, Hannah had plans to retire/move abroad/move on last year so I guess that didn't fully work out if she's back here from time to time. I note she no longer feels she can justify £150/hr (price when I saw her 2 years ago) and has re-introduced anal to her enjoys list. It smacks of a "packing the punters in" considering she's been £200+/hr in the past. If she's at the same level as 2 years ago, it's reasonable value but not if she's jaded.

Of course it might not actually be Hannah at all and she's sold her profile on. Sadly OP's review doesn't help much with that.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,299
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
To be fair, LLP, a tout would've made much more of an effort. It's so generic and devoid of specifics or detail that I'm more likely to believe he just made it up to improve his stats.

Back to the SP, Hannah had plans to retire/move abroad/move on last year so I guess that didn't fully work out if she's back here from time to time. I note she no longer feels she can justify £150/hr (price when I saw her 2 years ago) and has re-introduced anal to her enjoys list. It smacks of a "packing the punters in" considering she's been £200+/hr in the past. If she's at the same level as 2 years ago, it's reasonable value but not if she's jaded.

Of course it might not actually be Hannah at all and she's sold her profile on. Sadly OP's review doesn't help much with that.

Thanks for the extra detail  :drinks:
Will give him a little longer to rectify although he's been back since posting.

Offline JamesRockford

Realised I need to start posting reviews instead of lurking

Why do these oddballs always begin like this?

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,299
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Moved to Old Street AND dropped her price to 100ph!

That's very telling and not in a good way.

No odds on what the service will probably be like.   :dash:

Perhaps one of the "swordsmen" should "en garde!"
« Last Edit: March 16, 2020, 09:42:47 pm by LLPunting »

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,593
  • Likes: 130
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Moved to Old Street AND dropped her price to 100ph!

That's very telling and not in a good way.

No odds on what the service will probably be like.   :dash:

Perhaps one of the "swordsmen" should "en garde!"

Yes I saw that too. I assumed it was partly the market conditions and also she was trying get as much business in before leaving again. A Polish reg I saw early last week said it had dried up in Central London and it was only regulars who were making appointments.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Yes I saw that too. I assumed it was partly the market conditions and also she was trying get as much business in before leaving again. A Polish reg I saw early last week said it had dried up in Central London and it was only regulars who were making appointments.

+1

A regular I saw last week said bookings had fallen off the cliff. As she is a P/T it does not effect her to much but one has to assume it is the same for all WGs.

Prices haven't yet started dropping though. Maybe when the apartment rent is due and the dusty phone syndrome has kicked in.

We shall see.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline JamesRockford

My guess is that prices will fall for the crazy end of the market but not for wg’s in the reasonable 100-120 bracket. If people aren’t punting it’s not due to economic reasons ... yet.

Just my guess