For some reason ES always feels slightly classier to me. I think as long as you do enough research you can meet some decent girls on there. As long as they have verified pics that is. Reviews system seems to help a bit also although perhaps this is easily manipulated. The whole punting world is a minefield I suppose and sites like this help us make ‘intelligent’ and informed decisions?
In contrast to most other opinions of it here, I'd second this. I've only consistently used it in Glasgow, however, so can't really speak for elsewhere - though many of girls on it do tour Scotland with the same profile.
I used to be more dubious, but having never suffered a proper b'n's from it - and probably as much (or as little) overall success, relative to the number of bookings I've made from it compared to AW - I now consider it as simply another option, albeit with a only a fraction of the number of profiles. On saying that though, presumably due to the more time-sensitive manner in which ES charge for listing, you usually find that the vast majority of girls are available every day their profile is visible, all with a ringing phone number, nearly all of whom answer first time - or respond very quickly if they don't. You're lucky if you get that with even a tenth of seemingly available, matching AW results - green light or not. So in terms of the number of girls you can call, pay and actually be inside of within a matter of hours, those relevant numbers are probably far more comparable than things initially seem.
I wouldn't say there's any more or less affordable quality on it, relative to the quantity that AW has. However, there's certainly far more genuine, high-end foreign girls, if your budget's willing to stretch that far - often lots of Latinas doing anal for 100/150. There's usually also a fair few trans-girls on it as well, in case cock-with-tits is your thing. At the other end of the scale, there tends to be next-to-nothing in the way of cut-price, sour-faced, Paisley-based, conning, gypsy-trash that AW is consistently clogged with.
The site definitely does have a preferential sheen to it, though I'd consider any "reviews" it provides as a load of fake, manipulated shite - whilst some of the other waffle describing Scotland's various cities as tourist destinations is simply laughable. However, I'd say their verification system has improved slightly - at least anecdotally, in the sense that unverified profiles are always full of obviously-fake stock porn photos, while the verified ones often have at least one self-taken photo of the same girl as the other pro-shots. One of my very few semi-regulars only advertises on ES, presumably because AW requires face photos and IDs for verification, naturally putting a lot of still very-genuine, well-performing girls off.
Like any site, much is down to the luck of the draw. Which is why you always need to do some research, cross-check on here, confirm services and be prepared to walk if anything isn't to your liking. In terms of taking a complete blind punt though, if anything, I'd sooner do so off ES than AW. Perhaps that's mainly because there's more high-end, high priced girls, thus less risk relative to the greater coin. It at least leaves you on a surer footing than the clearly TGTBT bollocks AW constantly throws up.
