Author Topic: Vikki - Diva Escort - Gloucester Road - Good but too expensive  (Read 2081 times)

Offline TheOracle

External Link/Members Only

I met Vikki two or three weeks ago in a flat on a side road of Gloucester Road located in a building where I've seen a couple more escorts in the past.

She answered the intercom promptly which is good 'cause the road was quiet but the front door porch made me feel somewhat exposed. Opened the door equally promptly and revealed herself as an attractive petite blonde in her thirties (probably 33/34). Surely not the 24 declared on the website (the selfies are airbrushed to make her look younger). She had no make up on (which is better for me) and looked maybe a little tired, but was not unwelcoming. She has a beautiful face with blue eyes and regular traits, typically slavic I would say but quite attractive with a pointy nose and high cheeks. Long, blond hair possibly dyed, beautiful mouth, 8+.

Body-wise she has a lithe figure with good curves, nice ass although not particularly toned and big tits that she declares as "natural" but have an innatural hard lump at the center attached to the chest and therefore are probably slightly enhanced. Again, body-wise she's an 8 for me.

She had a demure attitude but I felt at ease: she waited for me get undressed while sitting on a sofa and looking at me with a kind of an enigmatic look. When I got back from the shower (for what she gave me a big clean towel) she was sitting on the bed with a relaxed attitude. She stood and kissed me gently: for most of the meeting she rarely opened her mouth, mostly kissing me with her lips and keeping her tongue to herself, although we had a few soft tongue encounters.

Sex-wise I found her very engaging and participating: she left me finger her (lightly), and both during that and while I was eating her pussy she got very wet. Her OWO was very good and she went on intently sucking me with great expertise during a pretty long 69. In missionary she was raising her legs to the maximum, really welcoming me inside her and she seemed to enjoy the act quite a bit. I didn't last long, and we spent the time between the two rounds in gentle cuddling, during what she was very warm and tender, kissing me and caressing me gently while I hold her in my arms.

Second round was quite intense and again she took quite a pounding although I wasn't very energetic and didn't manage to come.

Overall, I would say that the performance was quite good, although I felt that given her age and the limited kissing 250 quid was too expensive.

Face: 8+
Body: 8
Performance: 8.5
Location: 9
VFM: 7

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Your call obviously for rating!!! IMHO wrong rating..
 £250 for 💩 snogging!! :dash: :dash:
« Last Edit: October 27, 2019, 06:11:29 am by king tarzan »
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Artful Rodger

For most of the meeting she rarely opened her mouth, mostly kissing me with her lips and keeping her tongue to herself, although we had a few soft tongue encounters.

DFK not listed in her ‘services’ - always read the small print!

Offline BanksRobin

Thanks for the review “The Oracle”. Have had my eye on her but at £250 was less keen to go for it. Overall I think your positive rating and VFM score of 7/10 is something I concur with based on your version of events.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
DFK not listed in her ‘services’ - always read the small print!

I've had a few dfk not listed but got dessert dfk😋😋😋👅👅👅🍨🍨🍨

Eye of the 🐅🥊🥊🥊🥊face to face confirmation is simply the best better than all the rest thing to do!!🥊🥊🥊🥊
« Last Edit: October 27, 2019, 09:20:39 am by king tarzan »
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Fully Sated


(the selfies are airbrushed to make her look younger).


It is good to know about the 'airbrushed selfies' The Oracle, many of us ( and by that I mean me) are under the mistaken impression that the selfies offer a more realistic representation of the girl.

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: October 27, 2019, 09:52:39 am by Fully Sated »

Offline PatMacGroin

I've noticed Diva have started including ""selfies" with the WG pictured holding a phone (like the far left example above). Those are not really selfies. They are the same as the other professional shots, taken with a camera (not a phone), just using the phone as a prop. Like the rest of the professional looking photo's Diva use they have no doubt been heavily touched up.

Some of the Diva profile do include real selfies. I'm no photography expert, but I think you can tell the difference. I think it's must be something to do with camera quality, lighting or whatever other tools professional photographers use. Those other 3 "selfies" above may be "real" selfies, but only the last one looks definitely genuine to me (and that could still be using god knows what camera phone filters).

(Edit: Looking again, I could be completely wrong about that. I was sure I spotted a couple like that the other day. Posed with a phone as a prop. I specifically remember thinking what a piss take it was. But, just tried to look back over the profiles I thought I browsed, and can't find any. Maybe I'm going mad.  :unknown:)
« Last Edit: October 28, 2019, 02:30:05 am by PatMacGroin »