Brooke_deluxe Glasgow tour

[Sean81]

External Link/Members Only

Met Brooke in a central Glasgow Hotel not far from Central Station £140 for an hours entertainment

This is only my second review so go easy

Comms were very good, sent initial text message the day before she replied quickly and we got a time sorted no problem

Location was spot on, busy hotel no bother getting passed reception to the lifts

Got to the room and the door was open, got in and brooke was on the bed dressed as agreed

She looks really nice and her profile in no way does her justice, her body is really nice, skin very smooth and facially tidy as well

The meet was very good, plenty DK, OWO and sex in various positions, I have to say her tits are really magic and she has a very good body

Shower after was good, nice shower with clean towels

A good punt with a nice girl who was chatty and a good laugh

Only my second punt after layla and although she might not hit the heights of laylas intense dirtyness it was a good visit which I enjoyed

[2 pair]

Thanks for the review.
She is on my, to do list.
After her last review in Carlisle, I was put off.
This is a bit more reassuring.
Maybe she wasn't getting much work down there and got bookings, at the same time and squeezed them in.
Who knows, but stays on my to do list.
 

[mickey1967]

Been on my list for a while also, but had similar thoughts reading her last review.

Would you say she was a size 8, previous reviews tend to suggest she's a bit bigger than this.

[Sean81]

Id say size 8/10 but she's by no means fat or even a bit chubby, she's got a great body, tits and arse are cracking

[mickey1967]

Thanks, I find the touring girls sometimes quote the dress size they might used to have been, rather than what they are now, will keep her on my "to see" list.

[2 pair]

Thanks, I find the touring girls sometimes quote the dress size they might used to have been, rather than what they are now, will keep her on my "to see" list.

Your not wrong there.
It is something common,with service providers, in general I feel.
Don't think she's a size 8, that the o p suggested, maybe a 12/14.

[mickey1967]

If she's a 12/14, but quoting as a size 8 then that's not on. Can live with one dress size out but if you turn up expecting a size 8 and she's a 14 then I'd be in walking territory there.

[2 pair]

Maybe a 12 then.
Going by her last neutral review.

[Sean81]

No chance she a 12 to 14 imo, there's hardly a pick on her

[Monthehoops]

No chance she a 12 to 14 imo, there's hardly a pick on her

I’m sure your missing the point, a size 8 is what she states and 12-14 makes her have more of a pick on her than 12-14

[Monthehoops]

Edit : 8

[The Man With No Name]

I’m sure your missing the point, a size 8 is what she states and 12-14 makes her have more of a pick on her than 12-14

No chance she's anywhere near this, unless she's heaped on about 3 stone in the last year. Was a shapely size 8 when I last saw her, so even if she has piled on the pounds, the most she's likely to be is a smallish 10 by now.

You need to remember that women's sizing is all done by width. At only 5'7, a size 14 would make her a definite chubster that nobody in their right mind would pay to shag. Size 10 at 5'7 can actually be cracking look, provided a bird has the legs, hips and tits for it.

Accordingly, the best overall figure of a bird I've ever shagged was a size 12. But because she was 5'10, she pulled off the naturally-trim, yet womanly slight curve of her hips perfectly, with reasonably-sized tits to go. Her sister, on the other hand was just as tall, but only a 8-10. Quite pretty, but like most catwalk models, the result was a body resembling a 16 year-old boy - dull, dull, dull.

Then there's H-cup tits on a 5'4, size 8 frame. That's a whole different ball game of proportion again... 

[JJ72]

No chance she's anywhere near this, unless she's heaped on about 3 stone in the last year. Was a shapely size 8 when I last saw her, so even if she has piled on the pounds, the most she's likely to be is a smallish 10 by now.

You need to remember that women's sizing is all done by width. At only 5'7, a size 14 would make her a definite chubster that nobody in their right mind would pay to shag. Size 10 at 5'7 can actually be cracking look, provided a bird has the legs, hips and tits for it.

Accordingly, the best overall figure of a bird I've ever shagged was a size 12. But because she was 5'10, she pulled off the naturally-trim, yet womanly slight curve of her hips perfectly, with reasonably-sized tits to go. Her sister, on the other hand was just as tall, but only a 8-10. Quite pretty, but like most catwalk models, the result was a body resembling a 16 year-old boy - dull, dull, dull.

Then there's H-cup tits on a 5'4, size 8 frame. That's a whole different ball game of proportion again... 

It's posts like the one that you've replied to that makes me think people have a terrible understand of women's dress sizes. To be fair, the women themselves do us no favours by seemingly choosing numbers at random.

On topic - Brooke was definitely more closer to a 10 when I saw her. She's fairly tall for a girl so that probably doesn't help discern accurate waist measurements. Definitely not a 12/14. That would be ew.

[mickey1967]

Right, you've persuaded me, I'll go and find out myself!!!

[Dweeby]

Been on my list for a while also, but had similar thoughts reading her last review.

Would you say she was a size 8, previous reviews tend to suggest she's a bit bigger than this.

I wrote the last review. I described her as "Older and a bit bigger than her profile, perhaps 30+ years old. Still quite nice." Which I think is accurate.

Regarding my comments about back-to-back booking. I'm under no illusions that some of these girls see lots of guys, but it was just blatent when I saw her. She was putting lippy on for the next guy, and hadn't taken a shower.

But as I wrote, service was reasonably OK.