Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: 20, banging body and 12 feedback - photos from MetArt  (Read 1673 times)

Offline scooby73


  • Ban Countdown
    Loading...
  • Posts: 569
  • Likes: 0
  • Reviews: 9
Hmmmm.
No reports on here but has 12 feedback from May when she joined.
Banging body but sort of seems a bit to good to be true?
Any seasoned professionals advise please?

External Link/Members Only

Offline Waterhouse

Could be wrong, but strikes me as though it may well be a B&S set-up.  Just a hunch.

Offline winkywanky

I wouldn't have said too good to be true.

I think the rates are pretty well in line with other Rom profiles, where the girl looks fairly gorgeous but you're likely to get an indifferent service with any discretional services denied you (like OWO).

If you get a good service then that's a bonus, but don't expect it.

Offline Malvolio

The bit about being warm, friendly and approachable could well be too good to be true.

I'd say those are most likely the pictures of the WG you wil meet - only one way to find out if you're curious.

Offline king tarzan

Does look very deliciano supremo 😋😋👅👅👅
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline PLeisure

Well-written profile description - I doubt the WG had much input - Sergei might have actually stumped for a copywriter's fee this time!
Of course, we know not to align the words with the service. These empty declarations promise so much and often end up as nothing more than negative leverage when we review a disappointing meet.
That said, her price is right for an exploratory half hour. And you should always walk if it's not the girl greeting you with her legs wide open as in the first image  :music:

I hope it works out...

Hidden Image/Members Only

Online LLPunting

Why didn't any of you (or anyone else) do a reverse image search or use Tineye?

If we're all VERY lucky then the girl had turned to tricks and away from modelling, otherwise BUSTED!   :dash: :dash:
External Link/Members Only

Look at her AW reviews, a lot of the guys have feedback from either departed/banned/deleted SPs or from the same ones.   :bomb:

None of the reviews confirm she's the girl in the photos.

Someone near to where she is please do go have a look, that would be hugely appreciate by the rest of us   :hi:, at least if you have to walk it won't be too much hassle.  I'm not going to spend over an hour each way just for an "Oh, you're not her".
« Last Edit: September 08, 2019, 09:54:20 pm by LLPunting »

Offline Waterhouse

Why didn't any of you (or anyone else) do a reverse image search or use Tineye?

If we're all VERY lucky then the girl had turned to tricks and away from modelling, otherwise BUSTED!   :dash: :dash:
External Link/Members Only

Look at her AW reviews, a lot of the guys have feedback from either departed/banned/deleted SPs or from the same ones.   :bomb:

None of the reviews confirm she's the girl in the photos.

Someone near to where she is please do go have a look, that would be hugely appreciate by the rest of us   :hi:, at least if you have to walk it won't be too much hassle.  I'm not going to spend over an hour each way just for an "Oh, you're not her".
I did check and that’s exactly what made me suspicious.

Online LLPunting

I did check and that’s exactly what made me suspicious.

You cryptic teaser. 
Guess I was being too charitable again  :dash:  Will try harder to be less indulgent like you.