Escorts with personal websites

[dukeqq]

Hey guys, has anyone had an experience with those escorts with their own personal websites (like Gigi for example)?

With the amount of detail and effort put into their sites, I have the impression that they are likely to put in more effort into sessions as well.

What do you guys think?

[Poopster]

I think an awful lot of the girls with personal sites try to sound like something special, tend to charge more and have golden fanny syndrome.

[Hairpuller]

Personal websites .... fancier photos and location sets .... same services (probably) but inflated prices

[weewilly]

Unless they have an active AW then to me just using a personal site means they dont want anyone to rate them ie they're probably shite service or as was suggested, golden fanny syndrome

[TKovac]

Yup screams self important cuntresan to me.

Same as all the "not on the high Street" shite you get. Sure there is the occasional star, if only to prove the rule but otherwise just indicates the lady is trying to pretend she's not a prossie like all the rest on adultwork.  Same for the dumb fucks who see them and like to think they are a cut above the rest of us mongers

Also it just seems stupid to make it harder for folk to find you

[Jock D]

What do you guys think?

I think it would be a good idea for you to...actually go out and shag a hoor and then post a review on here.

[HazelValentine]

Ahh, disappointing if potential clients think having a website is an indicator of a worse service, rather than better.

I would have thought whether you have a website or not makes little difference, and instead what you put in writing about yourself/whether services match up with expectations/previous reviews/how attractive (and realistic) photos are would be more crucial


For me, it's just about covering all bases... Website, Adultwork, Twitter, ES, Tartan Ladies, Punterlink, UKE, the whole range basically
Even some that so far haven't been that rewarding - EuroGirlsEscort, Tryst, and Adultseek (although now more people seem to be on Adultseek)
It makes sense to have a presence on as many platforms as possible, to reach as many clients as possible. Also hope then if clients see that a lady is on multiple sites, they are more likely to trust that I'm not a scam or fake.

I also have the analytics on my website and I can see some people are finding me "organically" ie. when they Google search for Glasgow Escorts etc
So this makes the website useful in my view, and right now am getting about the same amount of clients that contact me through my website as I get on AW.

I get the valid point about people using websites to avoid reviews, which is why I have my AW feedback linked on the website


I'm not gonna post a link or anything as that definitely would be touting but those who want to find it can quite easily

[Clattypats]

Ahh, disappointing if potential clients think having a website is an indicator of a worse service, rather than better.

I would have thought whether you have a website or not makes little difference, and instead what you put in writing about yourself/whether services match up with expectations/previous reviews/how attractive (and realistic) photos are would be more crucial


For me, it's just about covering all bases... Website, Adultwork, Twitter, ES, Tartan Ladies, Punterlink, UKE, the whole range basically
Even some that so far haven't been that rewarding - EuroGirlsEscort, Tryst, and Adultseek (although now more people seem to be on Adultseek)
It makes sense to have a presence on as many platforms as possible, to reach as many clients as possible. Also hope then if clients see that a lady is on multiple sites, they are more likely to trust that I'm not a scam or fake.

I also have the analytics on my website and I can see some people are finding me "organically" ie. when they Google search for Glasgow Escorts etc
So this makes the website useful in my view, and right now am getting about the same amount of clients that contact me through my website as I get on AW.

I get the valid point about people using websites to avoid reviews, which is why I have my AW feedback linked on the website


I'm not gonna post a link or anything as that definitely would be touting but those who want to find it can quite easily

Whatever your point is/may be... If I were you I would probably Vet  punters more stringently, rather than preach on here... Its always worth checking those that like to see Barebackers(and that's just one who's AW FB edwardmorillo is on) ... Have a wee look for yourself... Just a heads up...

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=195153.msg2053571#msg2053571

Edit:Even though I know she's taken it off her LL now, she's had it on and off for ages... If you need any further evidence of who this Barebacking arsehole has seen, I'll be only to happy to post links etc... 

[dukeqq]

Thanks for sharing all the pro tips guys, appreciate it.

Thumbs up to hazel for giving your two cents worth too

[Sexy.gabby]

Whatever your point is/may be... If I were you I would probably Vet  punters more stringently, rather than preach on here... Its always worth checking those that like to see Barebackers(and that's just one who's AW FB edwardmorillo is on) ... Have a wee look for yourself... Just a heads up...

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=195153.msg2053571#msg2053571

Edit:Even though I know she's taken it off her LL now, she's had it on and off for ages... If you need any further evidence of who this Barebacking arsehole has seen, I'll be only to happy to post links etc... 

I'm not entirely in agreement with your publication. although it is true that with AW you can check if the client has visited a girl who does bareback, but I would say that only 10% of customers use this reservation system, and many other customers, when they make a reservation with girls that offer this type of services, they do not send them reservation requests.

unfortunately there is no method at present to avoid this type of customers 100%. 

[Colston36]

Hey guys, has anyone had an experience with those escorts with their own personal websites (like Gigi for example)?

With the amount of detail and effort put into their sites, I have the impression that they are likely to put in more effort into sessions as well.

What do you guys think?

I asked the most dedicated performer I know why she didn't have a site. She said it wasted time she could use otherwise. I think it depends like so many other things on the person.

[Jock D]

I get the valid point about people using websites to avoid reviews, which is why I have my AW feedback linked on the website

I'm not gonna post a link or anything as that definitely would be touting but those who want to find it can quite easily

 

[Clattypats]

I'm not entirely in agreement with your publication. although it is true that with AW you can check if the client has visited a girl who does bareback, but I would say that only 10% of customers use this reservation system, and many other customers, when they make a reservation with girls that offer this type of services, they do not send them reservation requests.

unfortunately there is no method at present to avoid this type of customers 100%. 

Sorry you don't agree... But it's a simple matter of checking AW FB... See, it's harder for punters, as it's a 3 way check: ie. I'll look at yours, then who every punter you've seen, has seen, then who that WG has seen..Whereas its a 2 way check for WGs... Check the punters, then who they have seen...its not rocket science... 

I agree nothing is ever 100% though...

[HazelValentine]

Whatever your point is/may be... If I were you I would probably Vet  punters more stringently, rather than preach on here... Its always worth checking those that like to see Barebackers(and that's just one who's AW FB edwardmorillo is on) ... Have a wee look for yourself... Just a heads up...

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=195153.msg2053571#msg2053571

Edit:Even though I know she's taken it off her LL now, she's had it on and off for ages... If you need any further evidence of who this Barebacking arsehole has seen, I'll be only to happy to post links etc... 

Wasn't aiming to come across as preachy. Yes, I have seen that edwardmorillo has been discussed on here before, although it wasn't until after when I saw him. I do check clients previous feedback thoroughly looking for if they've seen any bareback providers, although as you said, if she's been taking it on and off her profile for a while now it must have been bad luck that it either wasn't displayed whilst I was checking in December last year, or it slipped through my checks which would have been a mistake on my part.

Adding on to what Gabby was saying, you cannot know for sure whether anyone has seen any bareback providers for 100% certain, as any member with a longer punting history will likely have plenty of 'Member Not Active' feedbacks where you can't view their profile... So how can you be certain that none of those SP were risky/that none of them offered unprotected sex?

As it's impossible to know for sure whether those profiles had listed bareback, you can only work to the best knowledge you have - turning down punters who see openly bareback SP or ask for it (which was clearly unfortunate that I didn't in this instance) and reducing your risks by a) assuming everyone you book could have an STI and working accordingly (for me this is only ever protected sex, & I offer OWO if clean but not CIM) and b) getting tested regularly. I will also add that edwardmorrillo did not ask me for or make any suggestions about bareback and of course, we used a condom, as I do with everyone. However I am definitely not here to defend him, having only booked him once, and since this has been made aware to me I would not book him again. I have also been tested twice since December (:

Sorry as I did not want to start anything here, but thought I should probably give my explanation. I will try to not get involved again unless anyone asks something directed to me specifically. Apologies

[scutty brown]

My view about escorts own websites is that I quite simply don't have the time or inclination to search for them.
If I want a punt I'll do a search on AW and VS and go through the resulting lists, easy to look through and compare. What I'm not going to do is try a google search for "Blackpool escorts aged under 30" or something similar and actually expect to get any useful results. Even if any of the hits are actually useful, scrawling through them  is a woods/trees exercise.
An escort can have the best laid out website in the world (and lets face it most are crap) but if you have to spend time searching for it and comparing it with others then its a total waste of time

[Belgarion]

Hey guys, has anyone had an experience with those escorts with their own personal websites (like Gigi for example)?

With the amount of detail and effort put into their sites, I have the impression that they are likely to put in more effort into sessions as well.

What do you guys think?

I think escorts like that are looking to appeal to certain clients.

The clients are usually referred to as mugs.

There is no link between a website and what she does with your instrument.

Wasted a lot of money on celebrity escorts. Do your research and spend money on the right SP

[Clattypats]

Wasn't aiming to come across as preachy. Yes, I have seen that edwardmorillo has been discussed on here before, although it wasn't until after when I saw him. I do check clients previous feedback thoroughly looking for if they've seen any bareback providers, although as you said, if she's been taking it on and off her profile for a while now it must have been bad luck that it either wasn't displayed whilst I was checking in December last year, or it slipped through my checks which would have been a mistake on my part.

Adding on to what Gabby was saying, you cannot know for sure whether anyone has seen any bareback providers for 100% certain, as any member with a longer punting history will likely have plenty of 'Member Not Active' feedbacks where you can't view their profile... So how can you be certain that none of those SP were risky/that none of them offered unprotected sex?

As it's impossible to know for sure whether those profiles had listed bareback, you can only work to the best knowledge you have - turning down punters who see openly bareback SP or ask for it (which was clearly unfortunate that I didn't in this instance) and reducing your risks by a) assuming everyone you book could have an STI and working accordingly (for me this is only ever protected sex, & I offer OWO if clean but not CIM) and b) getting tested regularly. I will also add that edwardmorrillo did not ask me for or make any suggestions about bareback and of course, we used a condom, as I do with everyone. However I am definitely not here to defend him, having only booked him once, and since this has been made aware to me I would not book him again. I have also been tested twice since December (:

Sorry as I did not want to start anything here, but thought I should probably give my explanation. I will try to not get involved again unless anyone asks something directed to me specifically. Apologies

I'm not slating your credentials per say... Sometimes a bit of due diligence is required from WGs rather than just excepting bookings at face value, without checking, and like I say its not the 1st BBer that cunts seen... Add that other arsehole Donnkydick to your list aswell...

 I've more than likely seen WGs these 2 dickheads have seen, but since they also see alot of non BBers, unfortunately I can't rule every WG out... All I can do is stay as safe as I can... 

[HazelValentine]

I'm not slating your credentials per say... Sometimes a bit of due diligence is required from WGs rather than just excepting bookings at face value, without checking, and like I say its not the 1st BBer that cunts seen... Add that other arsehole Donnkydick to your list aswell...

Yeah, I just wanted to make it clear that I do always check previous feedback for things like this, and that if I wasn't stringent enough at any point then I accept that is my mistake (also that it was my first feedback just a few weeks into starting) and anyone who's met me knows it would be ridiculous to suggest that I'd ever do bareback.

I think it might have been you that said on a previous thread, it's weird that anyone would want to see barebackers and then go to see respectable WGs. Unless perhaps they didn't realise (??) but it could also be intentional I suppose.
As there is a few well known/popular escorts on his feedback too.

And I have never been contacted by anyone with that username but thank you for making me aware. I think I will quietly back away from this thread now as I'm wary of rubbing anyone up the wrong way , and apologies again if I already have

[Clattypats]

I think it might have been you that said on a previous thread, it's weird that anyone would want to see barebackers and then go to see respectable WGs. Unless perhaps they didn't realise (??) but it could also be intentional I suppose.
As there is a few well known/popular escorts on his feedback too.

I don't think I said it was weird tbh, just think I said they were cunts  ... Anyway, if you done HH I would still see you... 

[Happyjose]

I think an awful lot of the girls with personal sites try to sound like something special, tend to charge more and have golden fanny syndrome.

I'd agree with this

[WARSZAWA16]

I'd agree with this

Me too.

[Happyjose]

Ahh, disappointing if potential clients think having a website is an indicator of a worse service, rather than better.....

I'm not gonna post a link or anything as that definitely would be touting but those who want to find it can quite easily

You do leave yourself open to accusations of touting with this post

The OP was a generalisation about the quality of service WG's who publish their own websites deliver. Offering yourself as an example is statistically irrelevant and so of little use to the discussion on this thread. It is of course, of usefulness to you in promoting yourself to the many punters who will read your post(s)

If you have some more quantitative analysis to offer, say a general survey of such websites compared to UKP reviews, that may be useful. 

.

[HazelValentine]

You do leave yourself open to accusations of touting with this post

To be fair I do get that, and understand how some might view that's how I came across. I suppose even having any comments anywhere here does just get my name seen by people, and in a way is a kind of indirect advertising.


I shouldn't really be checking UKP at all, but since I'm on my summer holidays now I admit I probably do have more time on my hands than I'm used to - I know this isn't a site for WGs and will avoid commenting in future. Will channel it into seeing more clients/making some video clips ...and will stick to UKE from now on.

[Happyjose]

To be fair I do get that, and understand how some might view that's how I came across. I suppose even having any comments anywhere here does just get my name seen by people, and in a way is a kind of indirect advertising.


I shouldn't really be checking UKP at all, but since I'm on my summer holidays now I admit I probably do have more time on my hands than I'm used to - I know this isn't a site for WGs and will avoid commenting in future. Will channel it into seeing more clients/making some video clips ...and will stick to UKE from now on.

That's up to you. Several WG's who post on here do find the balance, and many don't.

[Fat Bob]

I think an awful lot of the girls with personal sites try to sound like something special, tend to charge more and have golden fanny syndrome.

Can't say I disagree Poopster, however what about Scottish-Miss-Alex, would you say she also has golden fanny syndrome?  IMO she looks smoking hot and her personal website just adds some cream on top .  She also appears to have had quite a few positive reviews on here too.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

[Happyjose]

Can't say I disagree Poopster, however what about Scottish-Miss-Alex, would you say she also has golden fanny syndrome?  IMO she looks smoking hot and her personal website just adds some cream on top .  She also appears to have had quite a few positive reviews on here too.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

If you post the WG's numerical AW link it will be more easily searchable and display the forum stats

[Fat Bob]

If you post the WG's numerical AW link it will be more easily searchable and display the forum stats

Okay, duly noted.

[Happyjose]

Okay, duly noted.

It also helps when they change their profile name - the number stays the same

[TKovac]

Tbf I have no problem with Sex Workers who have there own website and advertise on a work. In fact often the personal website give a better feel for them before you cop a feel.

Also when adultwork occasionally goes defunct it's a good back up.


I just find ones with only a personal website or twitter suspect. Why cut yourself of from the most known advertising /profile raising site unless you have something to hide, or feel that your cunt is somehow fancier than all the rest (hint it fuckin isn't)

[Poopster]

Can't say I disagree Poopster, however what about Scottish-Miss-Alex, would you say she also has golden fanny syndrome?  IMO she looks smoking hot and her personal website just adds some cream on top .  She also appears to have had quite a few positive reviews on here too.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Well I don't know who she is and I'll be honest, I haven't clicked on either link to see.  There will always be exceptions to any generalised statement.  She might be the best little hooker in the world with the most humble website in the world, my questions to you are; have you seen her, where are your reviews of her and is she your favourite girl? 

[Happyjose]

To be fair I do get that, and understand how some might view that's how I came across. I suppose even having any comments anywhere here does just get my name seen by people, and in a way is a kind of indirect advertising.


I shouldn't really be checking UKP at all, but since I'm on my summer holidays now I admit I probably do have more time on my hands than I'm used to - I know this isn't a site for WGs and will avoid commenting in future. Will channel it into seeing more clients/making some video clips ...and will stick to UKE from now on.

So why not spend that spare time doing a survey like I mentioned for the members

That'll show you weren't touting 

[Fat Bob]

...my questions to you are; have you seen her, where are your reviews of her and is she your favourite girl?

Poopster, my comments are merely based on my observation of the WG's website which I thought was worth sharing.  I have not seen her, but she is firmly on my HL (along with a few others). Baw hairs crossed that one day I will actually see her.

[Cactus]

Ahh, disappointing if potential clients think having a website is an indicator of a worse service, rather than better.

I would have thought whether you have a website or not makes little difference, and instead what you put in writing about yourself/whether services match up with expectations/previous reviews/how attractive (and realistic) photos are would be more crucial


For me, it's just about covering all bases... Website, Adultwork, Twitter, ES, Tartan Ladies, Punterlink, UKE, the whole range basically
Even some that so far haven't been that rewarding - EuroGirlsEscort, Tryst, and Adultseek (although now more people seem to be on Adultseek)
It makes sense to have a presence on as many platforms as possible, to reach as many clients as possible. Also hope then if clients see that a lady is on multiple sites, they are more likely to trust that I'm not a scam or fake.

I also have the analytics on my website and I can see some people are finding me "organically" ie. when they Google search for Glasgow Escorts etc
So this makes the website useful in my view, and right now am getting about the same amount of clients that contact me through my website as I get on AW.

I get the valid point about people using websites to avoid reviews, which is why I have my AW feedback linked on the website


I'm not gonna post a link or anything as that definitely would be touting but those who want to find it can quite easily

Not that you were touting (you were), but you noted how easily you could be found, so a numpty like me found your website and then I clicked your feedback for adultwork, which in turn led me to your adultwork page.  As an escort who "covers all bases" in regard to advertising, you can't be doing that very well if you can't actually get yourself verified on adultwork... Mind you, your website has a strap over the top saying "verified and independant", so that's that sorted then. Obviously.

I get the feeling with escorts own websites that they try to project an image of being a cut above and something of a self proclaimed courtesan, rather than a lass who uses adultwork to sell there wares.  This also gives said escort the delusions of grandeur to think that they can charge a higher fee for their services because they're a cut above... Honest.

For me the world has gone nuts when (website or not), escorts think that they can charge £180 an hour.  Is their fanny actually made of gold? I'm looking for you to get me off for an hour, not personally employ you to design me a house, sort out my divorce or perform neurosurgery (unless it's a lobotomy, in which case crack on and I may pay you £180 for a shag next time).

[Courtney]

I'm not entirely in agreement with your publication.

Publication?!

Whatever your point is/may be... If I were you I would probably Vet  punters more stringently, rather than preach on here... Its always worth checking those that like to see Barebackers(and that's just one who's AW FB edwardmorillo is on) ... Have a wee look for yourself... Just a heads up...

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=195153.msg2053571#msg2053571

Edit:Even though I know she's taken it off her LL now, she's had it on and off for ages... If you need any further evidence of who this Barebacking arsehole has seen, I'll be only to happy to post links etc... 

An excellent “publication” Clattypants.

[rathbone]

Hey guys, has anyone had an experience with those escorts with their own personal websites (like Gigi for example)?

With the amount of detail and effort put into their sites, I have the impression that they are likely to put in more effort into sessions as well.

What do you guys think?

Haven't met Gigi - but generally speaking an escort with her own website could be a positive thing, provided she doesn't charge more of course.  Her website might have some more photos over and above what's on AW, and any extra information is helpful when making a decision.  It can also mean the escort is more switched on at marketing, however that doesn't guarantee better service.

[dukeqq]

Thanks for all the feedback mates, really appreciate it. As a fresh punter, I'm learning more each day and a search on UKP on Gigi revealed terrible reports. Thank goodness for you guys.

That said, I did manage to find another escort (with a website) but with decent AW reviews as well. Will try and let you guys know

[Happyjose]

Thanks for all the feedback mates, really appreciate it. As a fresh punter, I'm learning more each day and a search on UKP on Gigi revealed terrible reports. Thank goodness for you guys.

That said, I did manage to find another escort (with a website) but with decent AW reviews as well. Will try and let you guys know

You’ll try and let us know?

You sound more like a fantasist troll with each post

So far you’ve been given advice to read the wiki as well as a specific recommendation, and have ignored both suggestions. Typical troll behaviour

[dukeqq]

You’ll try and let us know?

You sound more like a fantasist troll with each post

So far you’ve been given advice to read the wiki as well as a specific recommendation, and have ignored both suggestions. Typical troll behaviour

For a guy with 2,932 posts but only 12 reviews, you sure like to talk alot of shit.

I've been nothing but nice and appreciative for all the help I've received from the nice guys here but you're nothing but a cynical bitch. Well, enjoy your sad miserable life you dumb cunt

[Happyjose]

For a guy with 2,932 posts but only 12 reviews, you sure like to talk alot of shit.

I've been nothing but nice and appreciative for all the help I've received from the nice guys here but you're nothing but a cynical bitch. Well, enjoy your sad miserable life you dumb cunt

Abusive and deflecting I see

Thanks for confirming my suspicions

[Poopster]

For a guy with 2,932 posts but only 12 reviews, you sure like to talk alot of shit.

I've been nothing but nice and appreciative for all the help I've received from the nice guys here but you're nothing but a cynical bitch. Well, enjoy your sad miserable life you dumb cunt

Right, that's enough of that.  You have been snapped at a little bit by one of the resident wolves, don't get the whole pack on your back by belittling a guy who has provided 12 reviews.  It's infinitely more than you've contributed so perhaps a little humility is in order.  I'm not saying kiss his arse, just don't come the smart-arse.  Shit sticks.

[Clattypats]

Must be something about all these ones with double letter endings: donustyee, boredtitss and now dukeqq... 

[Poopster]

Oh, bye then.   

[Happyjose]

Not the response of a genuine poster

Simply a troll (probably female) who realised their opportunity to continue taking the piss out of the forum and its members was coming to an end

.

[myothernameis]

Must be something about all these ones with double letter endings: donustyee, boredtitss and now dukeqq... 

I thought dukeqq was related to qqq, another banned memeber