WIFE_GONE_BAD - Edinburgh

[markwin]

External Link/Members Only

Rebecca is definitely a big girl (probably 20, maybe 22) with attractive facial features, pale skin, long tied-back dark hair... and huge boobs (42GG). Early 40s. The pics are accurate. She also offers a mistress service and has a website linked to her AW profile. Based in Leith, Edinburgh, in a really lovely and discreet private apartment. Parking nearby. Good comms.

I've now seen her twice - on both occasions for a £40 'quickie'. The reason for not trying longer is that she doesn't kiss at all, doesn't do OWO and doesn't like being licked... my three favourite things! Pity.

That said, she's smart and interesting, and attractive if you like larger, MILF-next-door women (which I do... among my varied tastes). The service is friendly but professional. Plenty of touching and ball tickling, as requested. Both times I've cum profusely on her boobs, very enjoyably.

Rebecca is definitely personable. When the urge is there she offers good relief. If she did more of what I liked I'd almost certainly be back for more -- but not really my thing. So neutral for me, but might well be positive for others.

[bigmike32]

Doesnt kiss doesnt do owo or doesnt like ro thats a negative for me.

[Clattypats]

I take it OP, the 1st booking was a POS?...This is a strange one...No kissing and no OWO, no RO is a "I wouldn't see"...Did you expect more from the 2nd booking,even though services are stated on her LL...

[Uncle Buck]

Doesnt kiss doesnt do owo or doesnt like ro thats a negative for me.

If it had been your review then of course, you could have given it a negative. However it was the OPs review and, to him it’s a Neutral.

That’s the whole point of punters reviewing their own experiences

UB

[bigmike32]

I agree ub its the ops review but just stating my opinion i wouldve left a negative. If i had seen on her profile no kissing no owo no ro i would not have went. If they are advertised and not delivered thats a big negative but its the ops review in the end.

[DaVINCI]

Obvisously it up to the OP how he rates the meeting but he knew that the SP doesn’t do the three things he likes but he returns and rates this as a Neu.

Is he rating his experience on the fact she does not do the three things he likes  which if she did would make it a better experience  or is it excluding the three things and her overall experience. If so, why return 

I have no intention of meeting the SP, just the post seems unclear.

[markwin]

I enjoyed the quick and cheap breast relief... but wouldn't choose this over amore engaged service. That's why (for me) it's a neutral. Appreciate it may be a negative for others.

[Matrix]

I enjoyed the quick and cheap breast relief... but wouldn't choose this over amore engaged service. That's why (for me) it's a neutral. Appreciate it may be a negative for others.

It doesn't matter. Your review, your rating. Unless you decide to downgrade it yourself. 

[DaVINCI]

I enjoyed the quick and cheap breast relief... but wouldn't choose this over amore engaged service. That's why (for me) it's a neutral. Appreciate it may be a negative for others.

You say you enjoyed the service you paid for. It is obviously how you see it but l would have thought it would have been a Pos, if you have returned 

The longer booking is irrelevant as yours was a short booking and you knew she doesn’t do the three things you like.

[markwin]

You say you enjoyed the service you paid for. It is obviously how you see it but l would have thought it would have been a Pos, if you have returned 

The longer booking is irrelevant as yours was a short booking and you knew she doesn’t do the three things you like.

It was a narrow call as to whether to return. But I was dead horny and there was nothing else on offer. Not enough excitement for me to make it a positive, though. Nor would I negative it, as she's up front in what she offers and perfectly pleasant. (You may view things differently, but that's how it is for me.)

[DaVINCI]

It was a narrow call as to whether to return. But I was dead horny and there was nothing else on offer. Not enough excitement for me to make it a positive, though. Nor would I negative it, as she's up front in what she offers and perfectly pleasant. (You may view things differently, but that's how it is for me.)

No problem  l just initially thought you were basing the Neu on her services you knew weren't on offer

[Reiver]

Doesn't like RO but has face sitting on her likes on AW .

[Matrix]

Doesn't like RO but has face sitting on her likes on AW .

Probably just as well unless your neck is laced with adamantium.

[Foodman]

She has covered facesitting on her likes list, hence the no reverse oral making sense.

[Clattypats]

She has covered facesitting on her likes list, hence the no reverse oral making sense.

Makes about as much sense as this post ... Think you should have read the review/thread properly...

[andymars19]

She has covered facesitting on her likes list, hence the no reverse oral making sense.

Is there a likes list option for that?   Only see "Face Sitting" - nothing about covered/uncovered.

[Foodman]

She explains in her text that she only offers covered facesitting, read the text.

Hopefully then it will make sense to you.

[Clattypats]

She explains in her text that she only offers covered facesitting, read the text.

Hopefully then it will make sense to you.

Oh aye, after a bit of searching... In her FAQs ... Wonder if it was there at the time of reviewing (A year ago!)...