Ria - Earls Court - Tour De Force

[morganstar]

Preamble: I've never had great experiences with English WGs, but was tempted by the sole picture by the pool.
Comms: Communication via text, short and sharp.

Location: As mentioned in the other review, a flat near Earls Court Station, but also saw her in a flat near Kensington

Services Received: FK, DFK, OW, RO, Sex,

Appearance: Head to toe model-level attractiveness, terrific body with a shapely bum and a very nice pair of breasts with a pretty face with big expressive eyes to finish things off. Nice and tall as well.

Price: £180 for half an hour initially, £250 for one hour bookings at later dates.

Personality: A very dry and sharp sense of humour. I can definitely see YMMV applying a great deal with her, but we hit things off fantastically.

The Punts: The initial punt was a lot of fun with more FK than DFK than I am used to, but in later punts the DFK is was much more full on. No OWO, which I know will be a red line for many, but the technique meant the OW was pretty good. Protected sex in various positions, she is particularly good in CG. 2nd and 3rd punt were very intense, I struggled to keep up at times.

Conclusion: That rare English WG with tons of enthusiasm and effort.

External Link/Members Only

[driver]

pass

[driver]

Thanks for your review. Limited services for that price, I'll definitely pass

[Jardent6]

Thanks for the review !

Thinking of seeing this girl for 30 mins

Could you clarify does she only allow 1 pop ?
Or would she have a problem if I wanted to have sex for 20 mins because I do usually last quite long. And I don’t want to Be rushed
Finally how is her hygiene standards especially in doggy . From experience it’s usually the British girls with the worst whiff in doggy .

[HERTSBLUE]

British  girls  and there prices thank God for the Poles 

[Strikar]

Thanks for the review, is it def her in the pic by the pool?

[Tali007]

Preamble: I've never had great experiences with English WGs, but was tempted by the sole picture by the pool.
Comms: Communication via text, short and sharp.

Location: As mentioned in the other review, a flat near Earls Court Station, but also saw her in a flat near Kensington

Services Received: FK, DFK, OW, RO, Sex,

Appearance: Head to toe model-level attractiveness, terrific body with a shapely bum and a very nice pair of breasts with a pretty face with big expressive eyes to finish things off. Nice and tall as well.

Price: £180 for half an hour initially, £250 for one hour bookings at later dates.

Personality: A very dry and sharp sense of humour. I can definitely see YMMV applying a great deal with her, but we hit things off fantastically.

The Punts: The initial punt was a lot of fun with more FK than DFK than I am used to, but in later punts the DFK is was much more full on. No OWO, which I know will be a red line for many, but the technique meant the OW was pretty good. Protected sex in various positions, she is particularly good in CG. 2nd and 3rd punt were very intense, I struggled to keep up at times.

Conclusion: That rare English WG with tons of enthusiasm and effort.

External Link/Members Only

So you have seen her 3 times but only decided to post a review now? Once she is ‘finally back in England’ as her adult work profile headliner states. Why not post before when she was away. Your have obviously been asked to post and you are carrying out orders. It’s actually sad. She doesn’t like you mate, you pay her to talk to you. Don’t be fooled into thinking anything else.

250 an hour, no owo? You have done this 3 times and last was so intense was it. Grow up mate. Your not fooling anyone

[anotherwoody69]

Original review March 12th??

[Heph]

So you have seen her 3 times but only decided to post a review now? Once she is ‘finally back in England’ as her adult work profile headliner states. Why not post before when she was away. Your have obviously been asked to post and you are carrying out orders. It’s actually sad. She doesn’t like you mate, you pay her to talk to you. Don’t be fooled into thinking anything else.

250 an hour, no owo? You have done this 3 times and last was so intense was it. Grow up mate. Your not fooling anyone

A brief review of the OP's post-to-review ratio, the number of his reviews, their detail, balance overall style and the span of his contributions, and I'd say that most of our fellow members are likely to a good deal more benefit from his posts than from yours to date. That can always change, of course, and we'll look forward to it, but in the meantime, over-aggressiveness in response to a decent review from what appears to be a valuable member, isn't doing you many favours.

(Also: "you're". You're welcome)

[Future great]

Profile suggests she's a squirter. Any evidence of this?

[niftyfiftydave]

British  girls  and there prices thank God for the Poles 

Agree, but the Polish market is very poor east and north at the moment, unless you have any good ones to recommend?

[magnetico]

£180 for 30mn and OW/FK only, this is the British service we can expect post-Brexit 

[Heph]

Not sure attacking 2 members is advisable. It comes across as trolling.

I'm getting the feeling he may be one not-to-watch. The clues are all there.

[massagepuntingfan]

I'm getting the feeling he may be one not-to-watch. The clues are all there.

I doubt he'll last long.

[GreyDave]

British  girls  and there prices thank God for the Poles 

A pole on yer pole does that mean I am in Europe ?

I`ll get me coat ..Christ an English girl at Lotto Winner rates not for me Jen 

[morganstar]

A brief review of the OP's post-to-review ratio, the number of his reviews, their detail, balance overall style and the span of his contributions, and I'd say that most of our fellow members are likely to a good deal more benefit from his posts than from yours to date. That can always change, of course, and we'll look forward to it, but in the meantime, over-aggressiveness in response to a decent review from what appears to be a valuable member, isn't doing you many favours.

(Also: "you're". You're welcome)

Cheers Heph. I've posted less often over the past year because it is clear that accusations of white knighting and trolling have become a lot more common place so it is refreshing to see someone do the opposite. Thanks again.

[massagepuntingfan]

I am absolutely baffled by this response, but hey, my first experience of being called a white knight.

What is most amusing about your response is that it was written in June, while my review was written all the way back in March. Yet your entire line of attack is on the timing of my review...

Forgive me if I do not feed the troll...

As you have probably read he attempted to infer the same on my most recent review after pulling him up for having a go at your review. He seems to think by not posting a review immediately after seeing an SP is a UKP sin and should be called out and attacked. I found your review to be balanced and informative. I have no desire to understand his posting motives but I will happily reflect back his base posting nature.

[morganstar]

As you have probably read he attempted to infer the same on my most recent review after pulling him up for having a go at your review. He seems to think by not posting a review immediately after seeing an SP is a UKP sin and should be called out and attacked. I found your review to be balanced and informative. I have no desire to understand his posting motives but I will happily reflect back his base posting nature.

Hmm I must disagree with that sentiment of his. Quite often after a punt, the warm afterglow, bitter rage or everything in between can definitely cloud your judgment. IMHO the primary purpose of these reviews is helping other punters and not just ranting about our own subjective preferences (although they will invariably make their way into a review to some extent whether we like it or not).

A lot of the best restaurant reviewers will visit an establishment at least 2-3 times before posting a review and while punting is not an exact equivalent, as i get older I do find this is a better way of approaching reviews (unless it is spectacularly good or terribly bad enough to require a review the first time round). Some will agree and many will not, but there is no need for us to 'attack' each other on here.

[massagepuntingfan]

Hmm I must disagree with that sentiment of his. Quite often after a punt, the warm afterglow, bitter rage or everything in between can definitely cloud your judgment. IMHO the primary purpose of these reviews is helping other punters and not just ranting about our own subjective preferences (although they will invariably make their way into a review to some extent whether we like it or not).

A lot of the best restaurant reviewers will visit an establishment at least 2-3 times before posting a review and while punting is not an exact equivalent, as i get older I do find this is a better way of approaching reviews (unless it is spectacularly good or terribly bad enough to require a review the first time round). Some will agree and many will not, but there is no need for us to 'attack' each other on here.

I'm in agreement with this. My understanding is if an SP is still working/has an active profile then any review is helpful. Waiting a couple of months to post a review will still give a decent representation of an SP's looks and services(you would hope so), whereas waiting a year the information is likely to be less accurate.

If I book an independent on AW who let say doesn't have many reviews/not so busy, I feel its safer for me as the reviewer to not post the review immediately. Hypothetically if I posted a negative and the SP is aware of this forum and reads the review, she would be able to counter by posting on this site/AW a response/nasty text etc. This is not something I wish to be embroiled in and is a safer way to post in my opinion. Agency girls are a different thing altogether as they see so many men/day its not as important to let the dust settle.

[massagepuntingfan]

I also appreciate I stooped to his level and have no desire to get involved with a spat with another member. I was attempting to make a point by reflecting back his 'attacks' which seemed completely out of context and unjustified.

[morganstar]

I'm in agreement with this. My understanding is if an SP is still working/has an active profile then any review is helpful. Waiting a couple of months to post a review will still give a decent representation of an SP's looks and services(you would hope so), whereas waiting a year the information is likely to be less accurate.

If I book an independent on AW who let say doesn't have many reviews/not so busy, I feel its safer for me as the reviewer to not post the review immediately. Hypothetically if I posted a negative and the SP is aware of this forum and reads the review, she would be able to counter by posting on this site/AW a response/nasty text etc. This is not something I wish to be embroiled in and is a safer way to post in my opinion. Agency girls are a different thing altogether as they see so many men/day its not as important to let the dust settle.

Yes I think the differentiation between time period is key, three months vs one year makes a very big difference.

And the latter point is an excellent point about safety I hadn't even considered and one that perhaps one we should all consider when posting 'instant' reviews.

[Heph]

Some of Tali007 's less-than-friendly and poorly judged posts seem to have been disappeared - whether at his own bidding, or someone else's, I can't be sure. With a fresh start and a fair wind, perhaps we can hope for better all round - encouraging decent and useful contributions as they appear, and the other stuff …not so much.