Sorry mate do not try or even attempt to call me out because my opinions differ from your own. It is for want of a better phrase total poppycock. It is clear if you read all the comments some forum members have issues coz he paid 400 queens heads n didn't fuck and/or appears to be poor value.
Let's leave the matter of your honesty there for a while, but I just re-read the thread and it's absolutely obvious that the mentions of the 400 quid are totally in line with what almost always happens on this site whenever people spend more than the average and end up describing an experience that's unconvincing for most. A lot of people here are convinced that paying more than 100 quid for a punt is madness, and that has nothing to do with why this guy is getting skewered. The fact you keep repeating it as if it was a valid argument, though, places you in the "dubious" category in terms of honesty of argumentation.
You have no clue regarding OP's HR procedures
Well, actually, I do. Let's leave aside the considerations about whether it's reasonable in any IT company for a "short term IT contractor" to have a 200 quid/day allowance on top of their salary (also, I would expect a contractor to work on daily rates, not having an allowance as an employee on business trip, but I might be mistaken).
Let's leave aside the equally ludicrous idea that employees of an IT company get an "entertainment allowance" in general on top of their salary, let alone one they can spend on whores, and that they get more because they are "nerdy IT guys" instead of "short term IT contractors".
Let's leave all this aside, and let's stick to what OP tells us.
This is what we actually know about OP's "HR procedures" (limited to payroll and expenses policy):
I used my company credit card. [...]
I do get £200 per day allowance to use on this credit card, per day, during my trip, which is supposed to last certain number of days but it got extended a bit more. And since I didnt really find anything I could spend that on since hotel was basically paid for so I only had to spend for food and uber, I tried to find a place where I can pay for an escort with credit card..and this place popped up. Theoretically, I could withdraw the cash but it would look like that I just stole it from the company. Now I see something random on my credit card statement and I can make all the excuses in the world for it [...]
So, as all contractors, OP needs to actually justify their expenses: he is telling us directly. He cannot just withdraw money, otherwise he'll have no justification for it. Strangely, though, he can just invent a justification for an entry on his credit card statement. This is ridiculous, companies are not dummies that let themselves be scammed so easily.
So, OP wil surely not be able to just "show an entry on a credit card statement": he will have to present receipts for his expenses, and associate them with a business reason.
It is simply ludicrous to think that even if OP's company gave him a daily allowance for "entertainment" (which is just a pathetic invention in itself), that would be tied to him spending said allowance via the corporate credit card: I could imagine OP getting more money for an offsite work commitment, but said money would simply be added to their salary and delivered via payroll, not provided via their company credit card. It would also be unconditional: allowances are for business-related expenses and need to be motivated.
Also, since when do "short term contractors" get company credit cards? This is just a big bunch of inventions, and the fact you keep defending this pile of shit means you're either very naive or very dodgy yourself.
He has explained over and over but keyboard warriors like yourself continue to challenge him. I see it for what it is. He had an excellent punt sometimes that does not mean fucking for 2 hours but just having a great time sex comes in various forms n enjoyment but perhaps you don't know???
Wake up bro 
He has not "explained" it over and over, he just added more ridiculous arguments to try and patch up his ridiculous story, and none of them were even vaguely convincing. You yourself should reconsider how "awaken" you are (or honest, to get back to that topic), given that earlier in this thread you were trying to defend him saying he hadn't really said that he used his company credit card (except it was already clear by what he had written he had done so), only to be proven wrong by OP himself. That didn't seem to lead you to consider you might have been wrong yourself, strangely.
Also, I might be mistaken with this, but I'm pretty sure that on one of the messages in this thread I had seen a reference to ATMs being rip-offs (you can see it mentioned in my first post in the thread), which of course was inconsistent with the idea that he had googled previously looking for card-fundable whore enterprises. As I said, I might be mistaken because there's another review by OP where he mentions the same thing, but I had not read it before and I remember seeing the same mention here: unfortunately UKPunting doesn't allow to see the history of edited messages so I can't double check it has been taken out. I wish I were an admin...
Re: your honesty as a debater,
You have no clue regarding OP's HR procedures or how the pro made him feel. He called it as he saw it. Just because it does not fit your prototype of the "perfect punt" don't assume he is a tout.
I gave a series of detailed reasons why OP's posts are a pile of shit, and the fact he claimed to be blown away by a single BJ is a tiny part of the whole argumentation. These things are the reason why you are not a serious participant in this discussion. Also notice how in previous meetings OP went for 2 rounds in an hour, but in this case for some reason in two hours he didn't even think about trying intercourse once. That's because neither his imagination nor yours are too well developed.
