Amorous Jessica Glasgow Tourer

[EasyJet]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Met Jessica recently

She looks like her pictures on her profile.

Geordie accent I think

Her directions were very business like as she would not reveal the door number till she could see you across the lift on the floor

Once inside the hotel room she went all for it

Straight into dfk against the door of the hotel room and going backwards onto the bed

Lots of owo followed with cim
Slowly teased and undressed and exchanged the cash
Started round two with her on top, miss, rcg, standing miss

Overall a very enthusiastic and pleasant meet

Only negatives
She has self harm marks on her arms from her past

Could see no visible or recent signs though

I would highly recommend

[FBman78]

Doesn't list cim even at discretion.

[Name Not Found]

Looks nice; shame about that hideous tat on her arm. Did she have any more ink?

[Clattypats]

Doesn't list cim even at discretion.

There seems to be a common theme developing here...

[FBman78]

There seems to be a common theme developing here...

I am labelling the O.P. a fantasist.

[Clattypats]

I am labelling the O.P. a fantasist.

Somewhere along the lines of my thinking... I'll even go out on a limb here and say, this recent spate of reviews could be easily written off the back of reading other members reviews...

[Micky5633]

He's mare Emirates than Easyjet the amount of reviews/WGs he is getting through.

[EasyJet]

Meet was months ago so memory may be hazy

I'm 90% sure she had me going and did cim as she had me rock hard by her enthusiasm as she opened the door

[Name Not Found]

Met Jessica recently

Meet was months ago so memory may be hazy

So, which is it?

[The Man With No Name]

Somewhere along the lines of my thinking... I'll even go out on a limb here and say, this recent spate of reviews could be easily written off the back of reading other members reviews...

Possibly, but why bother? Why not just post two or three genuine-sounding reviews for fraction of the work?

I'd say it's more likely a case of him genuinely trying to gain as much currency as he can on here. But for all his endeavour, his overzealousness has gone against him - i.e. he's put too much effort into trying to look like a genuine contributor, to the point he's simply made himself look dodgy instead.

When I first joined, I did something reasonably similar, posting four reviews all within the space of a few minutes - simply C&P-ing out of the one long entry I'd previously posted, into four discrete, separately-rated reports. Like me, he also posted his first ever review on it's own a few weeks before this barrage. The more I think of it, the more strikingly similar both these situations are.
 
This could simply be something comparable to that.

[Name Not Found]

Looks to me that he's hammering out reviews that bear only a scant resemblance to any punts that actually happened. I already wouldn't trust anything he says.

[Clattypats]

Possibly, but why bother? Why not just post two or three genuine-sounding reviews for fraction of the work?

Two or three genuine sounding reviews (as you put it), or for want of words, slightly more detailed reviews wouldn't be a fraction of the work... I could knock up 7 reviews like his in the space of about 20 minutes, no effort whatsoever required...

[Matrix]

Geordie accent I think

 

[EasyJet]

So, which is it?

Recently is still months back. One of my recent punts that was not a regular

[EasyJet]

Looks to me that he's hammering out reviews that bear only a scant resemblance to any punts that actually happened. I already wouldn't trust anything he says.

So how come two were toftts that no one had ever reviewed?

[EasyJet]

Possibly, but why bother? Why not just post two or three genuine-sounding reviews for fraction of the work?

I'd say it's more likely a case of him genuinely trying to gain as much currency as he can on here. But for all his endeavour, his overzealousness has gone against him - i.e. he's put too much effort into trying to look like a genuine contributor, to the point he's simply made himself look dodgy instead.

When I first joined, I did something reasonably similar, posting four reviews all within the space of a few minutes - simply C&P-ing out of the one long entry I'd previously posted, into four discrete, separately-rated reports. Like me, he also posted his first ever review on it's own a few weeks before this barrage. The more I think of it, the more strikingly similar both these situations are.
 
This could simply be something comparable to that.

Am I lazy as fuck

Guilty

I have written two toftts and others which are barely reviewed here

So you can classify all my reviews as whatever you wish

I don't need some credibility or seek any

I have asked for some info on the NW board and met the same escort afterwards

The white Knight's can come out in force

My reviews are lazy but true

Critique them all you want

[Matrix]

Who is white knighting? 

[Clattypats]

Am I lazy as fuck

Guilty

I have written two toftts and others which are barely reviewed here

So you can classify all my reviews as whatever you wish

I don't need some credibility or seek any

I have asked for some info on the NW board and met the same escort afterwards

The white Knight's can come out in force

My reviews are lazy but true

Critique them all you want

You seem to be getting a few services that aren't listed on LL, or some leeway with requests that are listed on profile... You must have something special about you that all these WGs are going out their way to appease you... 

[EasyJet]

You seem to be getting a few services that aren't listed on LL, or some leeway with requests that are listed on profile... You must have something special about you that all these WGs are going out their way to appease you... 

Unless I'm losing count one isn't a few???

All these?? Most I have visited once with the exception of some

[Clattypats]

Unless I'm losing count one isn't a few???

All these?? Most I have visited once with the exception of some

Think you've lost count then... No CIM listed on the above WGs profile... Then the other I've already mentioned:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=247619.msg2530265#msg2530265

No deposit required for you... No FK on LL... 3 instances in total (a few)... 

[Matrix]

Who is white knighting? 

Ah! I get it.

Anyone questioning the authenticity of these reviews is a white knight. 

Despite a white knight clearly being a love struck twat who tears into neutral/negative reviews of their favorite paid fuck.

Now why would somebody want to bring up white knighting on a thread where there's clearly none, unless of course, they're trying to detract?

 

[EasyJet]

Think you've lost count then... No CIM listed on the above WGs profile... Then the other I've already mentioned:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=247619.msg2530265#msg2530265

No deposit required for you... No FK on LL... 3 instances in total (a few)... 

Carmen
I didn't even know about the deposit till mentioned in this thread.
She definitely did dfk/for
I don't book escorts who don't fk or dfk

Why are you even mentioning her in this topic?

You have double figure reports here which means you must have some on aw. Can you not talk to Carmen and convince her not to take a deposit? You WILL absolutely need a car to visit.

As for amorous Jessica
We got on well and it was a full on sesh. My review is above and unedited.

You can critique it all you want

All you have done is prevented me from putting up some other reviews as 'im not seeking credibility'

I put up reviews of less frequently mentioned girls as Glasgow is  empty right now with talent

Are you next going to say a shared shower is not in the LL so it couldn't have happened

God forbid we go off tangent on your LL fascination clattypants

Sex isn't an exact science rambo

[Clattypats]

Carmen
I didn't even know about the deposit till mentioned in this thread.
She definitely did dfk/for
I don't book escorts who don't fk or dfk

Why are you even mentioning her in this topic?

You have double figure reports here which means you must have some on aw. Can you not talk to Carmen and convince her not to take a deposit? You WILL absolutely need a car to visit.

As for amorous Jessica
We got on well and it was a full on sesh. My review is above and unedited.

You can critique it all you want

All you have done is prevented me from putting up some other reviews as 'im not seeking credibility'

I put up reviews of less frequently mentioned girls as Glasgow is  empty right now with talent

Are you next going to say a shared shower is not in the LL so it couldn't have happened

God forbid we go off tangent on your LL fascination clattypants

Sex isn't an exact science rambo

All you had to do was mention in the first place that a deposit wasn't mentioned in her profile when you booked, but for some reason you didn't, when questioned about it...

The link I've put up in this thread is in context, and to counter your point that I've quoted... Is that so hard to understand!

A shared shower isn't an option to tick on a LL so whether I expect it or not is immaterial, whereas CIM ad FK are options on a LL, so I'm wondering why they aren't ticked if they are availible (to you at least)

You don't see WGs who don't do FK/DFK, so did you ask in comms if it was availible (aswell as the CIM with the other) , and this is something else you've forgot to mention...These are the type of things it's important to know from  a review 

I'm not debating that you've not seen "anyone" though I Stand by my initial thoughts on first reading the majority of them, and that is, that they can be very easily written off the back of reading other reviews... Whether this prevents you from writing anymore, I personally couldn't give a toss, as I couldn't/wouldnt base my decision of seeing a WG on what you've written anyway...

Oh aye... Happened to watch Rambo ll early hours of this morning... Good movie... 

External Link/Members Only

[Clattypats]

Ah well as I expected, previously banned... 

Whether it was Zidane18(as I thought) again or not, who knows... Byeeee!... 

[Matrix]

Clatty, I'm disappointed. It was Rambo 3! 

[The Man With No Name]

Clatty, I'm disappointed. It was Rambo 3! 

External Link/Members Only

[Matrix]

External Link/Members Only

Completely unrelated, but these put me in stitches.

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[Clattypats]

Clatty, I'm disappointed. It was Rambo 3! 

Oops!... Thought it said Rambo II ... Canny mind one fae the other tbh... 

[Courtney]

Ah well as I expected, previously banned... 

Whether it was Zidane18

....if it was him he must’ve slimmed down the fingers.

[Clattypats]

....if it was him he must’ve slimmed down the fingers.

Yeah, that was the only thing I doubted about my  suspiscions, but thought he had maybe seen this:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=236661.msg2420360#msg2420360

And thought spellcheck may be a good idea... 

[Courtney]

Yeah, that was the only thing I doubted about my  suspiscions, but thought he had maybe seen this:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=236661.msg2420360#msg2420360

And thought spellcheck may be a good idea... 

She was mid thirties around 4-5 years ago when I last saw her in passing

She seems to look different now in her new pictures but the michael jackson effect is evident.

I seem to recall her performance in the sack wasnt all bad

Just personality was nuts

...just needs to sort the spaces between the lines now.

[Clattypats]

...just needs to sort the spaces between the lines now.

Don't give too much away, incase another return beckons...