Author Topic: Xixi1996 Wimbledon  (Read 1763 times)


2 review(s) for Xixi1996 (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Derrick101]

Offline deek12345

Xixi1996 Wimbledon. External Link/Members Only


Saw review by Fletch on UKP for Xixi. Sounded good, although if she has small boobs as described in review, the photo of her with bulging boobs in the black mini is of someone else.

Tried to go Monday. Agreed on AW published rate. Was given postcode and I asked for full address. She wouldn’t give it. Found the road but not the house on streetmap. I was asked to call her when close. She is an hour from me. Quite usual for a WG to text her address when you are close by, so wasn’t worried.

My phone was playing up, going on and off. So, when I was 2 or 3 minutes from her…phone was working temporarily, texted her and asked her to text me address, telling her my phone had problems.

She wanted to know where I was..I said close. Sent several texts asking for house number…no replies. Told her I was tired of p*****g about, and I was going home. Am always wary of standing in the street very near a WG place and texting. Didn’t fancy spending time with a WG who was going to argue about everything. Another hour to get back.

During evening exchanged quite a few texts, including questioning why she would not text me her address when I was two mins away.  She texts, “I see you, then I give address”.

I realise she wants to have a punter screen test before letting anyone in. Thinking it might still be good to see her, I tell her my nationality and what I look like. Arrange to meet Tuesday.

Text her on Tuesday to fix time. Since she now knows what to expect (about appearance) ask can I have her address now.

Get very short answer, “No”.

This is clearly a lady who thinks you are lucky to see her, rather than that she is lucky to get customers. It;s up to you guys to show her it’s not true.

Tell her I have no intention of driving for an hour, to find she may not like my appearance and I have to go away again. Tell her to forget it.

Her AW page makes no mention of client restrictions by race, age or appearance.

I tell her I’ll give her a negative review, to prevent other guys visiting her and maybe failing the screen test, then having to go home.

So..if you are a tall 25 year old hunk, with a six pack stomach, you may at least get in the door. Whether her attitude above raises suspicions that you’ll THEN only get a good service if she fancies you, or happens to feel in a good mood, is a bit of a risk. ??

YMMV in proportion to your height/colour/age/build. 
Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Raven

Cheers for letting us know, I would also been p***ed as I hate being messed around and wasting our valuable time  :manhater:  off my HL me thinks :hi:

Offline Gambitman92

Its your review and you can rate it how you want but I dont think this warrants a negative, lots of girl will give their door/room number if youre on their road/inside the hotel. I understand from your point of view that its an hours drive so you want info in advance so you dont get messed around but maybe she's had time wasters in the past/weirdo address collects that never show up. Lulu who was my 2nd punt wanted me to get to her road so she can see me then she would give me the door number, she can see the whole street from her bedroom window.

You were close right? So imo you should have got to her street then text her, I bet she would have seen you. The second vist you tell her your looks then want her full address? How about you actually turn up then you can get to see her.

Personally I dont know what looks have to do with what you wrote, I'm black with some asian and I havent been turned down for my looks although I'm still new to this.
Banned reason: Ignoring warning about white knighting.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Sorry to hear mate but this is the way it is with some WGs. Although it can be done as a form of colour bar, it need not be. Since I think some WGs use the first impression as crucial before they let a punter in.

Out of interest did you text 'pi** off in your message?

Cheers!!
« Last Edit: April 23, 2019, 05:05:13 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Fletch747

Xixi1996 Wimbledon. External Link/Members Only

So..if you are a tall 25 year old hunk, with a six pack stomach, you may at least get in the door. Whether her attitude above raises suspicions that you’ll THEN only get a good service if she fancies you, or happens to feel in a good mood, is a bit of a risk. ??

YMMV in proportion to your height/colour/age/build.
Sorry to hear this Deek - the maid did actually call me as I was walking to the flat, so there was possibly some screening going on but I can assure you that I’m not a 25 year old hunk with a 6 pack!
All comms were done by text the day before and I wasn’t asked nationally, age etc.

Offline deek12345

in reply to gambitman you need to read my review.

I had agreed a time to meet her, and TWO minutes from that time, I TEXT her to say I am close, and to give me your house number 'cos my phone is on and off.

please read my review again - which says that.

For the next 5 minutes i am sitting on some garden wall - texting her asking for her door number- having already told her i KNOW which road she is in.

I have no idea I am supposed to stand outside her house to be vetted...AND I CANT ACTUALLY DO THAT...since she won't tell me exactly WHERE her house is.

You can make excuses for her attitude if you wish.

I'm not prepared to be moved around the road by text messages -  to put myself somewhere where she can see me.

I agree...she is entitled to want to see what a customer looks like before admitting them (provided they KNOW that's the basis of the booking and travelling) and i am equally entitled to warn potential customers that they MAY travel to her, (as I did) and not get let in if she does not fancy the look of them.

As far as I am concerned, I totally stick by my negative rating.

Travelling to a WG....without knowing she will effectively tell you to piss off if she doesn't like the look of you is NEGATIVE attitude. Totally unacceptable. The fact that some do it makes no difference to me

It's also a guide to the character and selfishness of the person you are going to see.

If you need to look OK...before she will see you...she should ask for a photo. Somebody booking 30 minutes...might get two hours wasted travelling...NOT acceptable

I reckon most punters are just as much at risk of dodgy appearance from false/photoshopped photos of WGs as the other way round.

NEGATIVE....
Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Stealthmode

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,176
  • Likes: 39
  •  
  • Reviews: 78
A negative is justified imo. if you have restrictions e.g race, nationality, age etc then put it clearly on your profile. That saves everyones time and money

Offline Gambitman92

in reply to gambitman you need to read my review.

I had agreed a time to meet her, and TWO minutes from that time, I TEXT her to say I am close, and to give me your house number 'cos my phone is on and off.

please read my review again - which says that.

For the next 5 minutes i am sitting on some garden wall - texting her asking for her door number- having already told her i KNOW which road she is in.

I have no idea I am supposed to stand outside her house to be vetted...AND I CANT ACTUALLY DO THAT...since she won't tell me exactly WHERE her house is.

You can make excuses for her attitude if you wish.

I'm not prepared to be moved around the road by text messages -  to put myself somewhere where she can see me.

I agree...she is entitled to want to see what a customer looks like before admitting them (provided they KNOW that's the basis of the booking and travelling) and i am equally entitled to warn potential customers that they MAY travel to her, (as I did) and not get let in if she does not fancy the look of them.

As far as I am concerned, I totally stick by my negative rating.

Travelling to a WG....without knowing she will effectively tell you to piss off if she doesn't like the look of you is NEGATIVE attitude. Totally unacceptable. The fact that some do it makes no difference to me

It's also a guide to the character and selfishness of the person you are going to see.

If you need to look OK...before she will see you...she should ask for a photo. Somebody booking 30 minutes...might get two hours wasted travelling...NOT acceptable


I reckon most punters are just as much at risk of dodgy appearance from false/photoshopped photos of WGs as the other way round.

NEGATIVE....

I did read your view, I'm not having a go at you but this all could have been avoided if you had of just listened, every wg has rules, some give address without a problem while others want to see you coming to their place, this has nothing to do with looks, she even said, “I see you, then I give address”.

She wants to see coming into her road so see actually sees that you actually came because some people are time wasters and not because she's ready to turn you down for your looks.

As for the bit in bold, is there any need to make up things like this? You're spinning this around like she sees people based on looks and you think she rejected you because of your looks and not because you wanted her address on tuesday before you even travelled.

Im black and any woman that judges a punter based on age, colour, looks etc is a negative to me but this isnt it and it nots helpful to anyone.
Banned reason: Ignoring warning about white knighting.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Stealthmode

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,176
  • Likes: 39
  •  
  • Reviews: 78
I did read your view, I'm not having a go at you but this all could have been avoided if you had of just listened, every wg has rules, some give address without a problem while others want to see you coming to their place, this has nothing to do with looks, she even said, “I see you, then I give address”.

She wants to see coming into her road so see actually sees that you actually came because some people are time wasters and not because she's ready to turn you down for your looks.

As for the bit in bold, is there any need to make up things like this? You're spinning this around like she sees people based on looks and you think she rejected you because of your looks and not because you wanted her address on tuesday before you even travelled.

waiting to see sight of the punter first doest combat time wasters unless she is double/triple booking. lets say he didnt turn up, then how would she have filled that slot anyway? the only way she would if she has given thr same time to more than 1 punter.

Im black and any woman that judges a punter based on age, colour, looks etc is a negative to me but this isnt it and it nots helpful to anyone.

If it is ‘see first then give address’ then whats to say it isnt a first come first serve set up, which would also be a negative.

if she does need to see sight of punter first, that doesnt combat time wasters anyway, unless she has double booked. lets say a punter didnt turn up at the time given, then what will she do with that slot? she would have had to have given someone else the same time to benefit the no showntime waster not turning up.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2019, 09:35:06 pm by Stealthmode »

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
If it is ‘see first then give address’ then whats to say it isnt a first come first serve set up, which would also be a negative.

if she does need to see sight of punter first, that doesnt combat time wasters anyway, unless she has double booked. lets say a punter didnt turn up at the time given, then what will she do with that slot? she would have had to have given someone else the same time to benefit the no showntime waster not turning up.

Having been on the end of this quite a few time  it can be annoying. I have had it where the WG can see you and yet will ask you to take a step back as if you
are on some kind of Hollywood photo-shoot  :P  :dash:

So I am not surprised to read what happened to the OP
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline deek12345

gambitman. you STILL havent read my review

She never did see me. I did not know where she was, so i couldn't stand outside her house.

I was 2 mins from her house...so she KNEW i was there, somewhere close, no question of WHETHER I would turn up..I was THERE.

I was not asking her address from miles away...but nearly at her door.

Im not saying she is prejudiced on race or size or age. But she wanted to check something before letting me in.

It's clear...she would not tell me where she lived...until she saw what i looked like...which she confirmed in the evening..and was going to do the same if i went back the following day

Draw your own conclusions.

No more comments from me.

 

Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
gambitman. you STILL havent read my review

She never did see me. I did not know where she was, so i couldn't stand outside her house.

I was 2 mins from her house...so she KNEW i was there, somewhere close, no question of WHETHER I would turn up..I was THERE.

I was not asking her address from miles away...but nearly at her door.

Im not saying she is prejudiced on race or size or age. But she wanted to check something before letting me in.

It's clear...she would not tell me where she lived...until she saw what i looked like...which she confirmed in the evening..and was going to do the same if i went back the following day

Draw your own conclusions.

No more comments from me.

I take it back, I had another re-read and much slowly.

Now I see why you are annoyed. It does not make any sense.

Cheers for clarifying - never had this where at the photo-shoot you are not even given where to stand on the podium  :P :dash:
« Last Edit: April 23, 2019, 10:42:14 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline SomTumFucker

Sometimes brothels get robbed for their vulnerability - cash rich and inability to call the law. Most robberies are by gangs - 2 or 3 guys or more. Sounds more like a security measure to check you are alone. Seems reasonable and protects everyone - so I wouldn’t read too much more into it.

Offline deek12345

From, SomTomfucker
Sometimes brothels get robbed for their vulnerability - cash rich and inability to call the law. Most robberies are by gangs - 2 or 3 guys or more. Sounds more like a security measure to check you are alone. Seems reasonable and protects everyone - so I wouldn’t read too much more into it
.

My reply: Given the poster's 76 posts/replies- mentioning lots of visits to WGs over years, without ever bothering to post a review, I'm inclined to treat this comment as the rubbish pointless comment it clearly is. A gang of three guys, seriously wanting to raid a WG...would just keep two guys out of sight until the house number is given, stand out of sight until the front door is open, and then rush the door. Not easy to achieve on a busyish road in Wimbledon. 
Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline deek12345

Follow up. Robbing brothel gangs in UK not too prevalent.

Google search show two instances. Feb 2015 and Feb 2016.

I reckon the average WG is more likely to get savaged by a goldfish.

Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Tokidoe

Maybe I should’ve doubled down on checking everything prior, decided to attempt a meet after work and this is what I get. Not a big deal since I live locally.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Gambitman92

Maybe I should’ve doubled down on checking everything prior, decided to attempt a meet after work and this is what I get. Not a big deal since I live locally.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Her positive review mentions that she's chinese and not from Japan as written on her profile. Some girls don't see men from their own country but what the maid did to you is a negative on its own, they should have put on the profile that they don't see chinese men or the maid should have asked where you were from before making you travel and waste your time for no reason.
Banned reason: Ignoring warning about white knighting.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Stealthmode

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,176
  • Likes: 39
  •  
  • Reviews: 78
Maybe I should’ve doubled down on checking everything prior, decided to attempt a meet after work and this is what I get. Not a big deal since I live locally.

Hidden Image/Members Only

write up a negative review

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Maybe I should’ve doubled down on checking everything prior, decided to attempt a meet after work and this is what I get. Not a big deal since I live locally.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Cheers for the int-ell'
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Parking

Maybe I should’ve doubled down on checking everything prior, decided to attempt a meet after work and this is what I get. Not a big deal since I live locally.

Hidden Image/Members Only

LOL WTF

Offline deek12345

Well...I did WARN you guys what to expect !!  :dash:

Her AW page makes no mention of restrictions about who she will or will not kindly accept, which she decides once you've travelled to nearby.

Anyone thinking of visiting her takes a gamble about whether (from her window) you are on her "approved list".
Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline rockharders

Maybe I should’ve doubled down on checking everything prior, decided to attempt a meet after work and this is what I get. Not a big deal since I live locally.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Deserves a negative.

Offline cotton

Maybe I should’ve doubled down on checking everything prior, decided to attempt a meet after work and this is what I get. Not a big deal since I live locally.

Hidden Image/Members Only
Some wgs like to make a big song and dance of handing over the address so i thought in the ops case maybe he simply wasnt willing to follow her instructions but what happened to you clearly illustrates her willingness to fuck people off without a second thought or a moments consideration to how far they may have travelled. Complete cunt imo.
Yeh leave her another negative review.

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,699
  • Likes: 539
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
been through this many times, and the simple fact is the girls want to make sure you're not the police or immigration, there to do a bust.
Nothing to do with race, everything to do with avoiding the law.
If I get a situation like that now I always walk
1) there's something dodgy and I want no part of it
2) there's no way I'm standing around like an idiot on a street waiting to get mugged or photographed by the neighbours

there's always the other option - get the address and walk anyway, then pass it on as they're likely to be there under duress. They're trying to hide from the law: why???

Offline cotton

Why ??? maybe because multi girl set-ups are illegal so by definition "dodgy" , irrespective if the girls are illegal , working under duress or britsh and working happily of their own choice.
If your going round collecting addresses and informing LE wily nilly about these "dodgy" establishments your just an informant , supporting a ridiculous law that victimises sex workers working in groups that maximises their safety.