Author Topic: JadeE341 - No Show (Outcalls Only), London. Time-waster (Read 1043 times)

SouthLONDON · « **on:** September 09, 2019, 10:15:49 pm »

External Link/Members Only

Sent a message about 3-4 weeks in advance. Her communication was so poor looked like she only replied AW email once or twice a week so it took almost 3 weeks to fix the date and time for the booking with her. I booked her on Adultwork for the date and time she requested. She read and confirmed my booking and gave me her phone no. I booked the hotel for that day
I confirmed with her the day before she still said it was okay to meet. Then on the day of booking she did not turn up. I called her few times, no answer. She only replied back after 1 week later to apologise
I booked the hotel for this appointment with her. I could not get any plan B outcall because of short notice. I could not even cancel the hotel booking

FCB · « **Reply #1 on:** September 09, 2019, 10:28:32 pm »

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Looking at her AW feedback & ratings, she's got quite a few bad feedbacks & negatives for no shows...

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Some of her AW feedback...

"She didn?t turn up and blocked my no. Waste of time and money. She already has a history of not making it to the appointments."

"She bid on reverse booking, I accepted, we exchanged messages and agreed details, but she failed to turn up and ignored my messages. Wasted reverse booking."

"Book and agree on a time and she never showed up wasted time and money"

"great comms, accepted booking, all arranged, then no show, no comms, no reply. Third time she has done this to me. So unreliable"

"No-show, sadly. Then stopped responding to my texts. Shame as I was looking forward, having seen her positive reviews on here and UK Punting"

"looks older wears a wig and way bigger and quite chavvy!! opened legs pumped it a bit but her pussy so loose and smelled gut wrenching so did a bit of anal"

James · « **Reply #2 on:** September 09, 2019, 11:07:48 pm »

i have tried booking her in past. Ask time then takes ages to reply, then says can only do after 5pm as she has work. i replied back saying ok. No response back, the emails have been read.

harder to get a hotel at the time she wants, earlier can book a day room and if she seems no show you just dont check in.

i think she has her regulars and just focuses on them and leaves new clients out, she has a pg to so probably earning of that
this review has made me cross her off the list

Jerk Chicken · « **Reply #3 on:** September 10, 2019, 02:30:30 pm »

In my review of Jade, despite my fantastic punt, I warned punters regarding booking a hotel and her not showing up. I further warned if you can't punt at home have a plan B as she was stacking up negatives for no show and hard earned down the drain booking a hotel.

I have seen her 4 times but on each occasion coms have not been great. Her FT job can make this difficult and I get that but I also get the feel she says yes to almost everyone and then decides who she will see closer to to the meet time and cba to inform the others the meet is off.

A shame as if you do get to fuck her you won't be disappointed.

btw OP what excuse did she give you?

James · « **Reply #4 on:** October 19, 2019, 10:45:58 am »

Lucky escape. She ugly. I booked a few weeks ago. Evening punt. She looks older then her stated age. Body is good. But face not a honey. Not even average. I turned her away. Gave half her 30 mins fee.
No review as meet didnt happen and i turned her away. She did turn up. So not her fault.
She also speaks with a lisp

Jerk Chicken · « **Reply #5 on:** October 19, 2019, 03:51:03 pm »

Quote from: James on October 19, 2019, 10:45:58 am

Lucky escape. She ugly. I booked a few weeks ago. Evening punt. She looks older then her stated age Body is good. But face not a honey. Not even average. I turned her away. Gave half her 30 mins fee.
No review as meet didnt happen and i turned her away. She did turn up. So not her fault.
She also speaks with a lisp

Surprised by these comments. She is not a stunner but ugly

I would also add to me, she looks younger than her stated age. Like everything looks are subjective/YMMV and all that. She is in my top 3/4 punts this year.

You should still have reviewed rather than tagging on to this one as it is the same as you going for an Incall and when the pro opens the door you just say nah and walk.

Something does not quite sound right with your post and your comments about her looks and age. It does not mirror the 4 UKP forum members who have seen her and subsequently reviewed.

The Film Director · « **Reply #6 on:** October 19, 2019, 04:02:35 pm »

Bad luck OP. That makes my recent no show (of the SP) sound trivial by comparison.

finn5555 · « **Reply #7 on:** October 19, 2019, 04:04:38 pm »

I have met her but didn’t do a report, she isn’t a beauty in the true sense of the word but far from ugly.

Jerk Chicken · « **Reply #8 on:** October 19, 2019, 04:12:09 pm »

Quote from: finn5555 on October 19, 2019, 04:04:38 pm

I have met her but didn’t do a report, she isn’t a beauty in the true sense of the word but far from ugly.

Exactly.

I am wondering if @James is one of those disgruntled punters that she ghosted. She has a few negatives on her AW account for not turning up.

finn5555 · « **Reply #9 on:** October 19, 2019, 04:17:27 pm »

Quote from: Jerk Chicken on October 19, 2019, 04:12:09 pm

Exactly.

I am wondering if @James is one of those disgruntled punters that she ghosted. She has a few negatives on her AW account for not turning up.

She was useless at comms got to admit but was hiding what she did from her fella

The Film Director · « **Reply #10 on:** October 19, 2019, 04:19:21 pm »

Quote from: Jerk Chicken on October 19, 2019, 04:12:09 pm

Exactly.

I am wondering if @James is one of those disgruntled punters that she ghosted. She has a few negatives on her AW account for not turning up.

She must have taken a shine to you JC, as she namedropped you on her comments tab

Jerk Chicken · « **Reply #11 on:** October 19, 2019, 04:21:51 pm »

Quote from: The Film Director on October 19, 2019, 04:19:21 pm

She must have taken a shine to you JC, as she namedropped you on her comments tab

Yes I saw that

She was not aware of this site until recently so some punk must have directed her here.

James · « **Reply #12 on:** October 19, 2019, 08:54:15 pm »

Im Not disgruntled that she has ghosted,
i guess looks are different for people. Jerk chicken you heard her speak, she speaks with a soft accent and a bit of a lisp.
i have not reviewed as im unsure of rules on this, the escort turned up. i turned her down.
that not her fault, more my fault.

So is a bit harsh doing a negative on her.
she arrived straight from work, went to the bathroom. i made my real phone ring from punting, made a fake convo. Told her had to rush back for family emergency.

Paid her half for her troubles and apologized.
I found her not in the model type and average. I have seen better looking girls then her in the past. Maybe im a lot more fussy.

She looked mid 20's to me,

salome · « **Reply #13 on:** October 19, 2019, 09:03:03 pm »

I've seen Jade. Review to come in the next few days. I really liked her and had a good time. Comms and timekeeping spot on.

To make clear, the JC quote was already on her profile at that time and I didn't mention UKP.

Jerk Chicken · « **Reply #14 on:** October 19, 2019, 09:56:45 pm »

Quote from: James on October 19, 2019, 08:54:15 pm

Im Not disgruntled that she has ghosted,
i guess looks are different for people. Jerk chicken you heard her speak, she speaks with a soft accent and a bit of a lisp.
i have not reviewed as im unsure of rules on this, the escort turned up. i turned her down.
that not her fault, more my fault.

So is a bit harsh doing a negative on her.
she arrived straight from work, went to the bathroom. i made my real phone ring from punting, made a fake convo. Told her had to rush back for family emergency.

Paid her half for her troubles and apologized.
I found her not in the model type and average. I have seen better looking girls then her in the past. Maybe im a lot more fussy.

She looked mid 20's to me,

Fair play but a couple of things.

1 Mate you are contradicting yourself. In your earlier post you said she is a lot older than her profile which states 29 but now you're saying mid 20s so which is it.

2 You said she was ugly hence my challenge. I get YMMV but no punter who has met her as gone on to call her ugly (we agree she is no beauty queen but still attractive) hence I was a tad suspicious of your post and motives.

Frankly I still am and as far as I can see there is nothing in the rules that state if a punter books an Outcall, the SP arrives but she does not measure up to his standards so he rejects her he cannot go on to post a review. To me your encounter would be valuable intel to UKP members in terms of her looks and body and the little bit of personality you got to see. Punters can then use your intel together with others and make their own mind up if they wish to grab a bite.

James · « **Reply #15 on:** October 19, 2019, 10:05:33 pm »

Hi, Just read that back, i accidentally put mid 20 instead of 30.
Ugly was a bit harsh maybe, but that what i thought really.
Maybe i should say average and not stunning, (Everyone has different taste and to me she was not attractive)

i guess i can review in a bit to provide valuable feedback for other users, i will do it as neutral, as negative is harsh, because i didnt like her

any way for the others who found her nice looking, good for you, and if she gave good service even better. service is what matters i guess. looks is the bonus

Author Topic: JadeE341 - No Show (Outcalls Only), London. Time-waster (Read 1043 times)

Member Benefits