Ms Demeanor - Stretford Manchester

[B1g B1ll]

This punt took place quite a few weeks ago now, I'm desperately trying to catch up!!!

A WG I was frequenting at the time told me that she had convinced her friend to give Escorting a shot as she thought she would be good at it and would enjoy it.  She asked me if I would be interested in taking her on her 'maiden voyage'.  An offer I just could not refuse, so arrangements were duly made via 'the friend'.
As a new girl on the block, obviously no reviews to refer to and even though I realised I was TOFTT, somehow the anticipation was high and the day did arrive, with a BANG!!!

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only

COMMS
Communication with Dee was easy and straightforward by text, with all messages being answered quite promptly, full postcode with access and parking details sent on the morning.

LOCATION
The address was easy to locate with sat-nav, parking was good and armed with a description the apartment block was easy to identify, it was quite a busy area so it was very easy to just blend in.  Once inside the apartment block internals, there was no windows, so unless you were unfortunate enough to have a neighbour at their door at the time you arrive, it all seemed pretty discrete.
The apartment block itself seemed well maintained and was clean enough. Into Dee's apartment, a nice clean & tidy place with no issues.
Showers and refreshments are available.

RATES
£40 = 1/4 hr
£60 = 1/2 hr
£120 = 1 hr
All inclusive

EXTRAS
N/A

GIRL
To quote from her AW profile " I don't put my face pictures up...." "but I know you will not be disappointed". For me this was very true... Dee is gorgeous, quite short and curvy in a black sexy dress & heels she looked stunning. Immediately her personality hits you, it was like a breath of fresh air.

Every now and then you come across an Escort (if you'll pardon the expression) who just stands head and shoulders above the rest, again quoting from her profile "I am very good at what I do because..........I TOTALLY LOVE IT.." and boy does it show, totally natural and unrehearsed.

Dee is clearly an educated and confident woman who knows what she wants and she knows how to do it.

EXPERIENCE
From the moment I entered her apartment, I just knew it was going to be a good one, every move she makes and every thing she does has an aire of sexuality about it, the way she constantly grinds herself against you and her reactions to your touch are just out of this world.

The skill set she has acquired within her 'pre-working' life is phenomenal, she kisses like an angel, (real heavy DFK, right up my street) she started off wearing quite a bit of lipstick, part way through she commented on how much lipstick I had on, but by the end there was no lipstick on either of us.  Her HJ & BJ technique are very polished too.

All of her likes list is available with no sneaky extras.

I have to say though my worry is that this was her first meet and that given a few months in and a couple of dodgy punters, she might well acquire that typical "toughened edge" that comes with most WG's.  Lets hope not though.

I booked 30 minutes of Dee's time, but come the end of my time I just couldn't tare myself away and ended up doubling to an hour (I could easily have doubled again), which meant an embarrassing trip out to a local ATM for more lolly afterwards, however this didn't phaze Dee and didn't cause an issue.

Seriously guys this girl should come with an EAS warning.

VFM
Absolutely superb value for money.

SUMMARY
Awe shucks, reading back through this review it sounds very fluffy, very fluffy indeed... So I guess you'll just have to try her for your selves, don't think you'll be disappointed though.

Now I know that its each to his own, "One mans meat......" and all that, but this was by far the best punt I have had. I plan to see Dee again over the next few weeks and it will be very interesting to see if, here we are a few weeks/months down the line, if she still performs as well as I remember the first encounter.

On a housekeeping note, I realise if shes just as good on a second meet, I cant re-review her - I could though if shes gone crap. But could I add an update to this review if its another positive?

Happy Punting...

[NigelF]

On a housekeeping note, I realise if shes just as good on a second meet, I cant re-review her - I could though if shes gone crap. But could I add an update to this review if its another positive?

Happy Punting...

Yes, absolutely. It's recommended that you do post an update in this review thread (I probably should do the same with some of my reviews but I'm too lazy and it also helps keep me relatively anonymous).

If you were to post another positive review, admin would just merge the threads so the latest review just appears as a post in this review thread.

Anyway, cheers for the TOFTT review.

[B1g B1ll]

Yes, absolutely. It's recommended that you do post an update in this review thread.

Cheers Mr F, top man.

[bolster3]

Good report that mate.
Might try and see her over Christmas as she says she's working between 22nd December and 2nd January all day, every day.
Heavy DFK is right up my street.

[B1g B1ll]

Well after much procrastination I have managed to get to see The Delightful Dee a couple of times, on Christmas eve for an early prezzy to myself and then again today.

It was good to see her a couple of months down the line.

Yes it was clear that she had learned a lot in that relatively short time and she was that bit more 'aware' of things, but hey it didn't detract anything at all, she was just as refreshing and as much fun as she had been on her 'inaugural meet'.

Dee is a natural at this and mark my words will go far!!!

[NigelF]

Well after much procrastination I have managed to get to see The Delightful Dee a couple of times, on Christmas eve for an early prezzy to myself and then again today.

It was good to see her a couple of months down the line.

Yes it was clear that she had learned a lot in that relatively short time and she was that bit more 'aware' of things, but hey it didn't detract anything at all, she was just as refreshing and as much fun as she had been on her 'inaugural meet'.

Dee is a natural at this and mark my words will go far!!!

Cheers for the update. Nonetheless, your post is exactly why I don't bother to update my reviews. Because based on what you've said, she'll know exactly who are (assuming she didn't know after you posted the review, which admittedly is unlikely in most cases) so if for example in the future you want to mention a negative point but still want to see her again - you might well be refrain from doing so especially since she might get offended or annoyed which might affect any subsequent punt you have.

You might think she's definitely not the type to be like that but based on extensive experience, very occasionally, even the best (in terms of attitude and seemingly not being easily offended etc) can sometimes get annoyed.

[B1g B1ll]

Yes Mr F, I was expecting some comment along these lines, however it was a calculated risk and one I accepted before I posted.

I realised it nailed my hat on if it wasn’t already, but as you stated the importance of an update is great and I felt especially so in this particular instance and weighed this pro against the marginal con of any repercussions of doing so.

I think under normal circumstances I would have subscribed to your logic and not been so blatant in my wording, but in this instance felt it was a safe bet.

But nevertheless, as usual I appreciate your comments.

[NigelF]

Yes Mr F, I was expecting some comment along these lines, however it was a calculated risk and one I accepted before I posted.

I realised it nailed my hat on if it wasn’t already, but as you stated the importance of an update is great and I felt especially so in this particular instance and weighed this pro against the marginal con of any repercussions of doing so.

I think under normal circumstances I would have subscribed to your logic and not been so blatant in my wording, but in this instance felt it was a safe bet.

But nevertheless, as usual I appreciate your comments.

Yes, adding info about your subsequent experiences is definitely very helpful but being so specific, in particular about when exactly you saw her but also how often doesn't really add much and I think you could've been much more vague without particularly compromising how helpful your comment was. I appreciate though, that more info is slightly more helpful (particularly knowing that you've had recent good experiences) and I personally also really struggle with trying to find the right balance of being vague and possibly even slightly misleading to the WG - without compromising how helpful my posts are. I also absolutely hate being inaccurate even if it doesn't really effect what people will take from I've said.

On occasion, admittedly very rare, I have previously felt reviews/comments have been safe bets but have been disappointed to find out that they weren't. Also note that if you think a review/comment is very safe/very unlikely to offend then that might be a sign that you've not been balanced enough, usually in regards to appearance. Of course that's not always the case and it certainly doesn't mean everything you say should include something negative just for the sake of "balance".

[aquilla]

.......... and it certainly doesn't mean everything you say should include something negative just for the sake of "balance".

I'm sure you're right, but as a new member here I notice how quickly people get called, or even banned for being, a "white knight".

[unplayable]

She doesn't see asian men, disappointing.

[B1g B1ll]

.....Also note that if you think a review/comment is very safe/very unlikely to offend then that might be a sign that you've not been balanced enough, usually in regards to appearance...

Hmm, I hadn't really considered that aspect, but take it on board for future reference.

[NigelF]

I'm sure you're right, but as a new member here I notice how quickly people get called, or even banned for being, a "white knight".

Please post some examples where someone has unfairly been called a white knight or banned for it.

In your review of XXX-Angela I can see you were desperate to find something you weren't happy with for the sake of balance (you chose the radio  ) so fair play to you. However, one small part of your review was actually getting close to white knighting territory since you seem to attack others in order to "defend" your new favourite prossie:

Some reviewers had previously said here and on another site that Angela was "average" or not particularly good looking, but I have to say that you are being very harsh. I found her to be very attractive both facially and in her body, beautifully wrapped in a LBD. Each to their own point of view of course.

You rightly acknowledge that everyone will have their own view but to say others are being "very harsh" is ridiculous. I'm sure they were being entirely honest and accurate with their views.

I've seen her too and definitely had a good time but I also would describe her as fairly average looking. Basically, I mostly agree with Bustydusty:

I actually agree that she’s only average looking but she definitely provides a great service which to me is far more important (and she has the best arse I’ve been in )

However, personally I definitely find looks to be important but certainly less important than service (at least usually, it can depend on my mood).

Amongst my group of friends, when talking about or "rating" girls (definitely not escorts though) I'm one of the most generous and "easily pleased". Overall, I'm certainly one of the least harsh.

It's great that you've given your opinion but saying others are "very harsh" is daft.

You also said this which is a classic sign of someone more interested in helping WGs than punters:

What followed will remain in the bedroom, but for the purposes of this review, I will say that I left jelly-legged.

You must realise that's rather useless? This is a review for site for helping punters not protecting the modesty of prostitutes. In order for a review to actually be helpful you need to at least state the services you received and why, specifically, they were good. Of course, that certainly doesn't mean you need to go into loads of detail but it does mean you need to at least touch upon the basics. To be fair, you did mostly do that in your summary so it's not a big deal. Nonetheless, have a read of this, particularly the summary for some handy tips:
External Link/Members Only

Anyway, I've even seen the other girl you reviewed, who also used to be Rachel at Karma Sutra Girls. You described her as "very attractive" but I was disappointed with her, especially compared to her pics (I see she has new ones but they still look airbrushed and flattering). Of course you have to expect misleading photos and an understated age at a parlour but I was still disappointed with her appearance. I can't remember much about the service, I think it was OK. The meet was a long time ago and overall I would've given it a neutral.

In your reviews you did make some comments that somewhat suggested that you've previously been disappointed, at least a little, by other WGs you've seen. As such, if you want to avoid being seen as a "fluffy" or "white knight" then it's a good idea to post reviews of the girls who you've been disappointed by. Of course though, the main reason to post such reviews is because negatives, neutrals and "low" positives are often the most helpful things someone can post.

[aquilla]

I appreciate your comments Nigel, and will take on board your suggestions.
I should have been more explicit on what services were wanted and what was offered, and will do so next time. However I am not going to go into graphic detail about every aspect of everything that happens, as some reviewers seem to do. There is a balance somewhere in between.

More reviews to follow from earlier in the year when time allows. I'm new to this group, although I have been seeing WGs for the last 30 plus years, and am happy to be able to post reviews in exchange for the information gleaned from here.

RB

[Wooderz]

My cock wasn't over impressed when I met her. Purely a matter of personal taste. She was friendly enough and I am sure most punters wanting a woman with her looks etc. wouldn't have a problem with her "chunky" body or yabberring Especially since her profile is not misleading (so I really should have known but decent priced Asian chicks are rare..)..

 But I wasn't over keen on either and as sometimes happens each of those two factors play against each other in a downward spiral and my cock goes the same way.. 

"Got there in the end though"..