Link: External Link/Members OnlyThere's no info on here that I could find about Kylie or indeed KSG's new Deansgate location so I thought I might as well write a review about both.
Location: This was at their Deansgate location and as per the website, it's at 65 Bridge Street. I walked past the front entrance (obviously on a busy street) but I wasn't at all confident about where it actually was or if I was going to end up standing around like a lemon (or for how long), as such I opted to check round the back. There's a rear entrance (black door), signposted as 65 with an electronic door bell. This entrance is at 65 Back Bridge Street. It's a small street/alley but the entrance is fairly near the end so there'll be people walking by who may glance down the alley and spot you. There's also a barbers next door so you might not want to stand right outside the entrance unless you want to be spotted by someone in there. It took a while for the receptionist to open the door, in part due to the moderate distance between the reception desk and the rear entrance.
I personally don't really care and overall it is discrete given the location but somewhere like Cosmo is probably still the gold standard because you can enter and exit so quickly and smoothly, even though it's right on a very busy street (which in some ways helps).
As for the interior, it's quite nice and accurately shown in the pictures:
External Link/Members OnlyThe above shows what the two "ground floor" rooms are like. There's additional rooms upstairs including a large "lounge" style room (I didn't go in to look around though) which I imagine would be decent for parties. The big downside is that there's no shower on the ground floor, they're all upstairs (assuming there's even more than one but I presume there is). The bathroom and shower itself were fine.
Price: £60 for 30 mins (£50 + £10 for OWO - she tried to charge an extra tenner for FK as well but I wasn't falling for that scam so she soon offered to include it in the tenner extra).
Looks: Her pictures are accurate. There might well have been some minor airbrushing to make her skin look more "flawless" but nothing major and her body is accurately shown. They claim size 6-8 and I'd say 8 sounds right, not any bigger. She's definitely a petite girl. They claim 32B breasts and even though they look a little smaller in the photos I think that's because she's wearing a fairly large bra (possibly too big for her) which covers most of her tits. I'd say B cups is about right but they're obviously not big. Facially I thought she was pretty. I'd say she has a slight "chav" look to her face but I don't mean that as a negative (not for my tastes anyway) nor am I saying she'd overdone her make up. They claim she's 22 and I'd say she looks around mid 20s, not older.
Service: FK was only fairly light, certainly not DFK but not just lip kissing either and there was a decent amount of it. OWO was good and had a decent depth to it as well. She refused CG (or rather strongly suggested we did a different position) citing back pain issues but I wasn't particularly fussed. Sex in a variety of other positions was enthusiastic. Unfortunately there was only minimal eye contact in missionary but I still enjoyed the sex overall.
She was friendly and had a pretty good attitude throughout. I wouldn't say, as the website claims, that she "loves to please" or that she's likely to be "perfect for submissive role play" but she might well be one of the better parlour girls for such stuff.
Overall: A pretty solid parlour punt but certainly nothing spectacular. Not a girl I'd rush back to see but I'd be happy to see her again, e.g. as a plan B (something I find myself in need of annoyingly often
).
