Author Topic: Pakistani Nina - Hounslow - There Shall Be Blood  (Read 4420 times)


26 review(s) for Pakistani NINA (13 positive, 7 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by JackJones]

Offline JackJones

External Link/Members Only

Needed a good fuck. I'd read the reviews and figured I was guaranteed one with Nina. Comms by text and over the phone - no issues - I made my way.

Arrived and had to wait for about 10 min - that appears standard.

I get to the room and I ask to use the shower before we get into it. I get to the shower and I notice two bright red drops on the tiles in the shower. I look closer, and it's blood. I examine the shower carefully now, and see about two or three faded trails of blood on the shower wall, like someone blew their nose out and it spluttered blood on the wall which then trailed down. Then the two massive blots on the tiles. Someone had been bleeding and I didn't like the look of it.

I remembered someone saying this girl sniffs a bit of powder so figured it was her nose but Nina comes to check it out and says its not her - must be the guy who just left. She offers to clean it up but it's too late - I'm put off and I leave.

Seemed a nice girl. Negative may well not be her fault but somebody's got to have it  :unknown:

I  won't be returning.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2019, 09:35:42 pm by azechai »

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,383
  • Likes: 185
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Seems a tad harsh (vindictive given your statement) given this has nothing to do with her service or attitude and all to do with your squeamishness.  :unknown:

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Seems a tad harsh (vindictive given your statement) given this has nothing to do with her service or attitude and all to do with your squeamishness.  :unknown:

+1

Extremely harsh.

OP ...On reading your review I auto assumed you was going to say she fucked you on her period but no you saw blood, went into a panic and left.

To me, this is a non review .. bordering on pointless and does not assist any punter with regards to evaluating her services.

Ridiculous!
« Last Edit: September 12, 2019, 10:21:39 pm by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline JackJones

No vindictiveness intended.

There are examples on here where a punter does not sleep with a WG but still leaves a review. A review is supposed to help fellow punters anticipate what might happen at a punt. Personally, I associate blood with an increased risk of infection; this is not just about being squeamish.

If a WG is bleeding from the nose or someone she saw is and she is not careful enough in her business to clean that up before the next punter arrives then that does go to her attitude and presentation is part and parcel of service provision.

In any event, I would want to know if someone on here encountered blood on a punt, and I've written the review for those of like mind. Everyone is free to make up their own minds as to whether or not this is a non-issue for them but I've done my bit.
« Last Edit: September 13, 2019, 02:51:39 am by azechai »

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
« Last Edit: September 13, 2019, 02:54:24 am by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,383
  • Likes: 185
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
No vindictiveness intended.

There are examples on here where a punter does not sleep with a WG but still leaves a review. A review is supposed to help fellow punters anticipate what might happen at a punt. Personally, I associate blood with an increased risk of infection; this is not just about being squeamish.

If a WG is bleeding from the nose or someone she saw is and she is not careful enough in her business to clean that up before the next punter arrives then that does go to her attitude and presentation is part and parcel of service provision.

In any event, I would want to know if someone on here encountered blood on a punt, and I've written the review for those of like mind. Everyone is free to make up their own minds as to whether or not this is a non-issue for them but I've done my bit.

Was she the only SP working on the premises?

Did you already come into contact with the blood before you noticed it?

Did you confirm when she last had a blood test and what she was tested for?  (Not that you could trust her to tell you the truth)

Did you have any broken skin on your person?

External Link/Members Only

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
There is no evidence the the blood belongs to the SP.

Her "story" could be true and the blood was indeed from the previous punter. I cut myself once in a hotel  bathroom trying to remove a bit of cork from a bottle of wine :(

If anything she is guilty of not checking everything is all dandy before the next punter. It that warrants a negative to you fair play. However, I still disagree.

As you said punters can make their own mind up if this review warrants a negative.!
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Muff licker

There is no evidence the the blood belongs to the SP.

Her "story" could be true and the blood was indeed from the previous punter. I cut myself once in a hotel  bathroom trying to remove a bit of cork from a bottle of wine :(

If anything she is guilty of not checking everything is all dandy before the next punter. It that warrants a negative to you fair play. However, I still disagree.

As you said punters can make their own mind up if this review warrants a negative.!
  +1

Offline Closetoyou

Whelpppp , I'm with OP here. Small chance if it's her bleeding from the nose any nose bleeding can easily go into throat since it's all connected and onto glorious owo. That is some free hypochondria after punt thinking about the lovely blood based STDs like HIV 😁.  That limped my dick instantly. Note to self OW maybe not such a bad idea.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Whelpppp , I'm with OP here. Small chance if it's her bleeding from the nose any nose bleeding can easily go into throat since it's all connected and onto glorious owo. That is some free hypochondria after punt thinking about the lovely blood based STDs like HIV 😁.  That limped my dick instantly. Note to self OW maybe not such a bad idea.

Punting is not for the faint hearted or squeemish. Every pro who gives you a BBBJ should therefore be placed into this category based on your precisé!
« Last Edit: September 13, 2019, 09:06:55 am by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Bornslippy


Offline LNDNman

This is a dangerous sport. You’re right OP... there shall be blood (along the way to the promised land), but I don’t think this negative is really deserved.

Offline RAJEC

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,493
  • Likes: 19
  •  
  • Reviews: 162
A bit of slack for op here I think.

Many punters may not be put off by it, but she should at least check her facilities before the next punter comes in. Basic hygiene of herself and her place of work?

If the blood did belong to another punter, who knows where it was from or how he managed to get it all over the shower. Was his knob bleeding? Had she just sucked him off? All a bit sketchy but fair play to her for giving his money back as technically the booking had started. Maybe it was her guilt  :unknown:

Offline Bornslippy


Offline sunnyj

Sorry to hear that and thanks OP for the review and the warning. It's your experience and your rating. I would have given negative rating if this happened to me.  :hi:

Offline SouthLONDON

Thanks for your warning
How I understand it is
If Nina did not notice the blood, does it mean she did not take a shower before OP came in?

For a professional WG we expected them to check everything before the next punter comes in. At least they should check if the floor in the bathroom is too wet/slippery or any shower gel etc

Yes a few drop of blood in the shower could be small things to some people, what if 2 drop of blood on the pillow case or the bed sheet that Nina could not see it, does it make any difference ?

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,383
  • Likes: 185
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Thanks for your warning
How I understand it is
If Nina did not notice the blood, does it mean she did not take a shower before OP came in?

For a professional WG we expected them to check everything before the next punter comes in. At least they should check if the floor in the bathroom is too wet/slippery or any shower gel etc

Yes a few drop of blood in the shower could be small things to some people, what if 2 drop of blood on the pillow case or the bed sheet that Nina could not see it, does it make any difference ?

"we expect..."   :dash:
You've had a feckin' charmed punting life if your expectation has been shaped that way at this end of the market.  Perhaps you're a frustrated hotel inspector?  I'd love to give the Hotel Inspector a thorough inventorying front and back, top to tail.

Offline JackJones

Was she the only SP working on the premises?

Did you already come into contact with the blood before you noticed it?

Did you confirm when she last had a blood test and what she was tested for?  (Not that you could trust her to tell you the truth)

Did you have any broken skin on your person?

External Link/Members Only

Thanks for the link. As to your questions:

1. She was the only WG in the premises.

2. Hadn't come into contact with it.

3. Nope. If I see blood outside the body, I'm not about to start assessing its safety. As you say, it's not like a WG owes a duty to act or disclose information in my best interest.

4. Not that I knew about. But I would have stepped into the shower barefoot  :vomit:

Offline JackJones

The diversity of views in the comments is welcome, but this was a negative experience for me and I have rated it as such. Everyone will do what they want at the end of the day, but as I have said, I have done my bit.  :hi:
« Last Edit: September 14, 2019, 09:47:57 am by azechai »

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
The diversity of views in the comments is welcome, but this was a negative experience for me and I have rated it as such. Everyone will do what they want at the end of the day, but as I have said, I have done my bit.  :hi:

I totally accept why your experience was negative and why you rated it so.

I called it harsh as you was not rating the pro per se but the condition of the bathroom and a perceived threat to your H&S.

I think fucking a pro for cash is H&S full stop. Many don't wash, do back to back bookings,  allowing her to suck ya dick with no condom and you eating her pussy out or even DFK when she might have had some baby juice just before you not to mention the ones that are offering bareback under the table all constitute H&S risks.

To me , a nuetral would have been a fairer reflection on the SP for the condition of the bathroom which she should have checked thoroughly before you arrived. You called it as you saw it. We just have to agree to disagree.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline LNDNman

My god.... can’t believe that we hare spending so much time talking about this drivel....

Negative is probs a bit harsh - but it is the poster/punter prerogative.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
My god.... can’t believe that we hare spending so much time talking about this drivel....

Negative is probs a bit harsh - but it is the poster/punter prerogative.

It is getting exposure because clearly punters are devided as to what constitutes a H&S risk and if OP for want of a better phrase was just being a pussy!

It is good to hear the differing opinions as it is quite an important issue.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline sunnyj

I totally accept why your experience was negative and why you rated it so.

I called it harsh as you was not rating the pro per se but the condition of the bathroom and a perceived threat to your H&S.

I think fucking a pro for cash is H&S full stop. Many don't wash, do back to back bookings,  allowing her to suck ya dick with no condom and you eating her pussy out or even DFK when she might have had some baby juice just before you not to mention the ones that are offering bareback under the table all constitute H&S risks.

To me , a nuetral would have been a fairer reflection on the SP for the condition of the bathroom which she should have checked thoroughly before you arrived. You called it as you saw it. We just have to agree to disagree.
Condition of location is as important as WG's look and service while rating a review.

Offline smellychip

The diversity of views in the comments is welcome, but this was a negative experience for me and I have rated it as such. Everyone will do what they want at the end of the day, but as I have said, I have done my bit.  :hi:

Agreed mate, this is good info for future punters to know. What were you meant to do, rate her a positive? Don’t see what the big deal is, if people don’t like it they are welcome to go fuck her and by all means post a review after

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,383
  • Likes: 185
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Thanks for the link. As to your questions:

1. She was the only WG in the premises.

2. Hadn't come into contact with it.

3. Nope. If I see blood outside the body, I'm not about to start assessing its safety. As you say, it's not like a WG owes a duty to act or disclose information in my best interest.

4. Not that I knew about. But I would have stepped into the shower barefoot  :vomit:

OK, so you hadn't stepped into the shower where the blood was.  So were you less concerned about the blood in the shower and that she could've been lying to you about her being the one bleeding?
Was there any other reason to hesitate seeing this girl, e.g. were you not really that taken with her looks (or smell) in person?  You thought she behaved nice enough.

Offline jezerb

Understand OP.
I am not scared of blood, but when going to see a WG that could seriously put me off...!
She should have checked the bathroom was clean, at the very least.