Author Topic: Karina Young Fire. Glasgow (Read 2193 times)

HumphryB · « **on:** November 07, 2018, 09:50:14 pm »

External Link/Members Only

15min/£40

It's not the girl in the profile pics, who i'd guess is Karina? (pics in the verified thread). But a girl who goes by Luna mentioned in the profile heading.
Just wanted to blow a load and thought i should TOFTT. Comms were by text alone but on reflection i doubt i was corresponding with Luna given her lack of English.

The venue is a little tricky to find, there's on street parking. No charges. i know the area and it would be busy in the daytime. I was there in the evening, dark. It is a bit dodgy, rough area.

So i'm met at the door and its a b&s, but Luna was attractive enough and i was already fired up, only 40 bucks. Fuck it. Flat is a bit rough. She is what could be described as buxom. A cheery disposition, she got down with some OW and then i banged her doggy. I wouldnt take her likes list seriously, questioned about OWO and CIM. Its a no. I can't go for a negative though cause my expectations were low and she was a good shag. I didn't leave unhappy.

its a nuetral. undecided if i would return.

Name Not Found · « **Reply #1 on:** November 07, 2018, 10:35:59 pm »

A B&S with an unrealistic likes list in a dump of a flat? You're being very generous with a neutral. In my opinion, every B&S should be a negative as everything about the punt, apart from the location, is meaningless. Just my opinion though.

Uncle Buck · « **Reply #2 on:** November 08, 2018, 01:05:09 am »

The great thing about reviews is that they are subjective. The OP says it’s a neutral so it’a neutral.
The next punter may wish to determine it a positive and the next after that may say it’s a negative.

It’s all fine with me providing they give some detail. The OP gave us the bare minimum!

UB

fedor · « **Reply #3 on:** November 08, 2018, 02:19:35 am »

B&S should always be negative IMO. At the very least we should know what we are getting into, and who we are meeting is THE critical component of that.

Name Not Found · « **Reply #4 on:** November 08, 2018, 09:08:27 am »

Quote from: Uncle Buck on November 08, 2018, 01:05:09 am

The great thing about reviews is that they are subjective. The OP says it’s a neutral so it’a neutral.
The next punter may wish to determine it a positive and the next after that may say it’s a negative.

The problem with that is that the next punter has no guarantee of seeing the same girl, so the bulk of the review is worthless.

FBman78 · « **Reply #5 on:** November 08, 2018, 11:13:18 am »

Quote from: Name Not Found on November 08, 2018, 09:08:27 am

The problem with that is that the next punter has no guarantee of seeing the same girl, so the bulk of the review is worthless.

I wouldn't call it worthless because had the girl been a great punt I am sure a few others would have gone and asked for Luna, as it is we know to avoid the Springburn "latinos".

Name Not Found · « **Reply #6 on:** November 08, 2018, 11:25:50 am »

Quote from: FBman78 on November 08, 2018, 11:13:18 am

I wouldn't call it worthless because had the girl been a great punt I am sure a few others would have gone and asked for Luna, as it is we know to avoid the Springburn "latinos".

Again though, how do you know the 'Luna' you're going to get is the same 'Luna' that the OPS saw? The nature of a B&S is fundamentally a lie, so who knows if today's lies are the same as yesterday's?

J_H · « **Reply #7 on:** November 08, 2018, 11:47:48 am »

Quote from: Name Not Found on November 08, 2018, 11:25:50 am

Again though, how do you know the 'Luna' you're going to get is the same 'Luna' that the OPS saw? The nature of a B&S is fundamentally a lie, so who knows if today's lies are the same as yesterday's?

That's a good point NNF.

I'd be honest and say that if I came across a B&S and the 'switch' was as shaggable as the 'bait' then, cock led and cuntstruck, I'd go ahead.

If the punt was good one, I'd have been inclined to go for a Positive while mentioning the B&S. But as you point out, the next punter doesn't know if he's going to get the bait, or the switch - or somebody different again.

Happyjose · « **Reply #8 on:** November 08, 2018, 11:56:04 am »

Nothing subjective about a B&S

Anything other than a neg is pointless for the reasons stated already.

The only reliable info for the next punter is that you're not seeing the advertised prossie

seeker · « **Reply #9 on:** November 08, 2018, 12:35:02 pm »

B and S is a Negative.
They lured you in with a lie.
Why they advertise with a face showing and then switch

Idiots ..

J_H · « **Reply #10 on:** November 08, 2018, 03:24:30 pm »

Quote from: Happyjose on November 08, 2018, 11:56:04 am

Anything other than a neg is pointless for the reasons stated already.

The only reliable info for the next punter is that you're not seeing the advertised prossie

Now agree.

Uncle Buck · « **Reply #11 on:** November 08, 2018, 08:58:19 pm »

Quote from: seeker on November 08, 2018, 12:35:02 pm

B and S is a Negative.
They lured you in with a lie.
Why they advertise with a face showing and then switch
Idiots ..

If it were your review then fair enough.

It wasn’t.

It was the OPs review therefore he can categorise it in any way he wants. It’s not a democratic voting system. It’s one punters assessment of his money spent.

UB

stoogman · « **Reply #12 on:** November 08, 2018, 10:02:46 pm »

B&S is always a Neg for me now, you can never guarantee what you're gonna get, even if the OP saw the real 'Luna' and she was a hot little burd in her 20's whats to say that when I go to see my 'Luna' I don't get some toothless old hag that's just wasted my time and effort or worse ... some barebacking skank!

HumphryB · « **Reply #13 on:** November 08, 2018, 10:36:14 pm »

I honestly didn't put a great deal of thought into the whole B&S part of the review. It's the first time i've encountered the situation and given the circumstances presented at the time went ahead. Which i now see as quite silly.
This thread has highlighted a few home truths about what B&S entails, from the dishonesty to the unknowable.
Im sure to be inclined to rate any future B&S as negative.
Thanks for keeping me on the right path lads

Happyjose · « **Reply #14 on:** November 09, 2018, 07:07:22 am »

Quote from: HumphryB on November 08, 2018, 10:36:14 pm

I honestly didn't put a great deal of thought into the whole B&S part of the review. It's the first time i've encountered the situation and given the circumstances presented at the time went ahead. Which i now see as quite silly.
This thread has highlighted a few home truths about what B&S entails, from the dishonesty to the unknowable.
Im sure to be inclined to rate any future B&S as negative.
Thanks for keeping me on the right path lads

The rating of any review, including this one, can easily be changed retrospectively, at the request of the reviewer

Entirely up to you

Name Not Found · « **Reply #15 on:** November 09, 2018, 09:30:06 am »

Quote from: Uncle Buck on November 08, 2018, 08:58:19 pm

It’s one punters assessment of his money spent.

We'll clearly have to respectfully agree to disagree on this one UB. My view is that, since this is the reviews section, the rating is intended to give an indication to other punters about whether or no the SP is worth visiting; you clearly believe it is a reflection of the punter's experience and nothing more.

FBman78 · « **Reply #16 on:** November 09, 2018, 11:10:20 am »

In all fairness Name Not Found, I always will rate a b&s negative although if I went through with the transaction and the meet was good I would say that in the comments. That is how I see it, others see it different.

J_H · « **Reply #17 on:** November 09, 2018, 11:39:20 am »

Uncle Buck · « **Reply #18 on:** November 10, 2018, 08:25:57 am »

Quote from: Name Not Found on November 09, 2018, 09:30:06 am

We'll clearly have to respectfully agree to disagree on this one UB. My view is that, since this is the reviews section, the rating is intended to give an indication to other punters about whether or no the SP is worth visiting; you clearly believe it is a reflection of the punter's experience and nothing more.

No problem NNF. We’ll agree to disagree and move on. The games all about opinions after all.

UB

seeker · « **Reply #19 on:** November 10, 2018, 10:54:55 am »

Quote from: Uncle Buck on November 08, 2018, 08:58:19 pm

If it were your review then fair enough.

It wasn’t.

It was the OPs review therefore he can categorise it in any way he wants. It’s not a democratic voting system. It’s one punters assessment of his money spent.

UB

The review is supposed to be of KYFire as seen in her profile .
Since KYF was not in the room for the meet but an unknown wg was there ,
Who is the review of?
,since any girl could be substituted into the room and the next punter wouldn't know who or what he will be Seeing its a Negative ,as the punter has been lied to to lure him into thr room under false advertising.

Clattypats · « **Reply #20 on:** November 10, 2018, 01:09:31 pm »

I have to agree with the general concensus on here that it was a B&S and should therefore be rated a Neg IMO...The person whom he thought he was booking wasn't there...

This then poses the hypothetical question...If you end up having a great booking with the "stand in" and find out at a later date who she is on AW, what do you do?...Do you Neg the one you originally thought you were getting, then Pos the other one because she was Shit hot?...

Personally, I would Neg both, in two separate reviews, as they were both part of the B&S...

Name Not Found · « **Reply #21 on:** November 10, 2018, 03:01:03 pm »

Quote from: Clattypats on November 10, 2018, 01:09:31 pm

This then poses the hypothetical question...If you end up having a great booking with the "stand in" and find out at a later date who she is on AW, what do you do?...Do you Neg the one you originally thought you were getting, then Pos the other one because she was Shit hot?...

But if you find her under another name on AW how can you be sure it’ll be her when you go and visit? I would just update my original neg from the b&s to alert punters to her new, potentially dodgy, profile.

Clattypats · « **Reply #22 on:** November 10, 2018, 03:28:15 pm »

Quote from: Name Not Found on November 10, 2018, 03:01:03 pm

But if you find her under another name on AW how can you be sure it’ll be her when you go and visit? I would just update my original neg from the b&s to alert punters to her new, potentially dodgy, profile.

I'm not talking about the original WG in the booking...I'm talking about maybe, a fellow WG that works with her, that has "stood in"...What if the stand in produces a great service, and is recognised as having a profile on AW at some point, aswell as the one that the punter had originally booked...Then they are both culpable of B&S if that makes any sense...

You Neg one for not being the one in the pics at the meet, then why not Neg the one you have actually seen, as part of the B&S, no matter how good a time you've had...Then it gets indexed also...