Author Topic: xRachel_Honeyx Harrogate  (Read 1827 times)


8 review(s) for xRachel_Honeyx (5 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline HarryZZ

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

1 Hour £150

This was my second meet with Rachel, the first was about 18 months ago which I thought I'd reviewed but I can't find it now.

The venue was a nice little terraced house close enough to the town centre but you can park in the street outside. The action took place in the ground floor front room, a little sparse but decent enough.

The girl, everything as described in her profile, nice looking girl, dark hair, fantastic tits and big nipples, she had a bit of a tummy, but no fatty by any means.

The action, we started with a shared shower, I had requested it as it used to be something on her profile but she's removed recently and the current over the bath shower isn't great for doubling up, she did oblige though and we soaped each other up nicely. Downstairs and she asks me if I want a massage, I like to book an hour as 30 minutes is too rushed but an hour is usually more than enough so I take the massage and she's very good at it, standard hands to start with and when I'm all oiled up she rubs her massive tits all over my back, I turn over and the front doesn't take so long, I'm standing to attention and ready for action. She starts with oral, she's very good at it, there's a mixture of techniques and I ask for some 69 before I blow my load, usually in a 69 I can concentrate on what I'm doing and I can hang on if I think I'm getting in front of myself, but she's so good it's not working so I ask her to stop, flip her over and just go down on her, she has a nice pussy probably larger than average lips, I like this. She came or made a very good imitation of cumming and asks me to stop as she's too sensitive, I oblige. On with the hat and sex in every position and when it's time I ask her to go back down on me and then ask her if she can still accommodate me laid on her back, head over the edge of the bed while I thrust away, she's happy to oblige and keeps a decent pressure on with her mouth while I pump away as deep as I can, when it's time I cum over her mouth, neck, chest and tits, there was a lot!

I have to say this was up there in my top three punts, the sex was great, her body is amazing but the lasting impression was that we chatted all the way through and she made me feel very at ease, I really enjoyed her company.

Would I go back, well I already have and I will return again, she's a bit pricey for my budget at £150 but well worth it if you can afford it.

Offline NigelF

The girl, everything as described in her profile

That's not true. She's certainly not the size 12 she claims on her profile. She's definitely at least size 14 (but I think 14 is probably her correct size). Remember, she claims to be 5ft 9", which seems about right, so if she was size 12 she'd be much thinner. Also, her pictures clearly aren't accurate. Aside from them being old, she's posed and taken them very "cleverly" so they're rather misleading. I don't think they're edited or anything but they do give a false impression. Of course unfortunately one should expect that to some extent and there are big clues about it given some of the poses she's chosen etc.

She also can't even describe her tits properly as in the 1st/2nd line of her profile she claims she has 34G tits but in her "vital statistics" (and also her interview page) it says 34F. To be fair, I do think one of those sizes is probably correct. I also think she's understating her age (she claims 28) but probably not by much or at least less than most girls (but that's still no excuse and it's also not "as described").

I gave her a negative recently here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=225648.0
However that was also significantly influenced by (among other things) the very misleading face pic that she briefly had up. It was also somewhat close to being a neutral (like one of her neutral reviews on here from a couple of years ago).

I have to say this was up there in my top three punts

Absolutely nowhere near for me although it probably helps that I have many other better options around my neck of the woods.

Anyway, cheers for reviewing and I apologise for "trashing" a small part of your review, I just thought it worth pointing out.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2018, 08:47:00 pm by NigelF »

Offline HarryZZ

I think she's lost some weight which may account for the different bra sizes, her tits are definitely big though.

Offline NigelF

I think she's lost some weight which may account for the different bra sizes, her tits are definitely big though.

That wouldn't really make sense though because the claim that's most likely to be up-to-date is the one at the top of her profile (34G), as she likely changes/updates the text of her profile (particularly the first/top bits) a lot more often than her vital stats and particularly interview (which both state 34F). So, if anything, that suggests she's gained weight - which might also make sense since she's definitely not the size 12 she's claiming in her vital stats.

Still, you said you said it was 18 months ago when you last saw her so I'm not particularly doubting she's lost some weight since then and the breast size isn't too important anyway however the dress size is and it does all illustrate my point about her profile not being accurate/her not being "as described in her profile".

Offline HarryZZ

YM is definitely V to M, I'm not saying you're wrong, it's all about opinions and there's no point in saying somebody's taste is wrong it's just different to mine, but you're probably riding the clutch!  :D