(2nd review on) RaquelBusty36EE. Back again and back to her best physically.

[DylanPerry]

Have seen Raquel (External Link/Members Only) numerous times over the past few years.
Did a review in March, here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=190923.0. It was the worst condition she's ever been in physically, so perhaps choosing to finally do a review on her after that specific punt was unfair on her.

She went back to Brazil for a few months and is now back in London. Was told by two other punters that I talk to, that's she lost a lot of weight. Thought it was hyperbole, so ventured to see for myself. They were correct  .

£70 for 1/2hr still.


Comms and venue

No issue with the comms as per with her.

Venue was back room at a terraced house in Leyton. My understanding is that this was a temporary location and she's now back in Stratford.


Differences to before

- She's lost a lot of weight. Told me 10kg; I can believe that. She's in the best shape I've ever seen her, a bit better than 2015. Her hip to waist ratio actually looks something close to her ridiculously edited photos now 
Says it was all hard work and dedication but I suspect she may have had some cosmetic help.

- Facially probably a bit more attractive now. Said she had some surgery on her cheeks.

- Pussy was WAY tighter (I would describe her as loose before). One of the other punters I mention also thought the same. It's a possibility she's had work done on her pussy too lol.

Overall, she just looks a lot more healthy.
Clutching at straws, the only thing I could criticise physically this time was a lack of hair removal on her legs. Which is stark contrast to the many negatives in my March review.

I still find her service largely average, with nothing particularly standout. Attitude still A*


UPDATED Ratings -

Looks: 7/10
Attitude: 10/10
Service: 6.5/10

Attitude and service unchanged. Looks have improved a whole 3 points. In my last review I said:

... in her prime, firm body etc...she was maybe touching a 7 in my book. Now...forget about it.

so I will honour that and give her a perhaps generous 7, on the grounds that she's now even in slightly better shape compared to what I referred to as her prime. + consider facial reconstruction.

Cheers,

Axe

UPDATED Overall: 23.5/30. Still a neutral, funnily enough.
.........................................................

Looks/Attitude/Service rankings to date:
(ties listed in favour of service marks)
=1) Burning.Phoenix 27/30 [profile dead, return unlikely]
=1) Lottie Lovelace 27/30 [not presently active, return likely]
=3) x beautiful nicole x 26/30 [not presently active, return possible]
=3) Suzy Cortez 26/30
5) Anna Flower 25.5/30 (YMMV warning) [profile dead, status unknown]
6) Maggie 24.5/30 [not presently active, status unknown]
7) PETITE PERFECTION (Pola) 24/30
.........................................................
8) RaquelBusty36EE 23.5/30 (SEPTEMBER 2018 PHYSICAL STATE; MAJOR WEIGHT LOSS)
9) SexiiMixedMegan 22.5/30 (2 point attitude points penalty due to late start. I.e. potential low positive)
10) RaquelBusty36EE 20.5/30 (MARCH 2018 PHYSICAL STATE)
=11) Polish Horny Maya xx 20/30 [profile dead, status unknown]
=11) Secret.Coco 20/30 [profile dead, return unlikely]
=11) Hot Ashley Babe 20/30
=11) MAYA E13 (Vivastreet) 20/30 [link dead, status unknown]
..........................................................
15) Bella 4U xxx 15/30 (considerable attitude and service points reductions due to refusing penetration (because of size). I.e. potential neutral, or even positive) [link dead, almost certainly will reappear elsewhere as per]
16) ArabianPrincessSW5 13.5/30 (10 point attitude points penalty due to theft. I.e. potential very high neutral)
17) Polish Amanda 5.5/30 [link dead, new profile active]

Top 3 Looks: Suzy Cortez (8.5), Burning.Phoenix (8) and Lottie Lovelace (8).
Might as well keep this footer until I get some suggestions-- I wanna see some stunners (9+ face and body)...any recommendations would be much appreciated!

Top 3 Attitude: Lottie Lovelace, Maggie21, BustyRaquel36EE and Hot Ashley Babe. All 10.

Top 3 Service: Burning Phoenix (9.5), Anna Flower (9.5), Lottie Lovelace (9) and x beautiful nicole x (9).

[Monger2468]

Nice review. She's Brazilian, but on AW states her nationality as 🇮🇹?

BTW, what are the rules (high level) on reviewing the same bird? I got hauled up as being a PIMP (I wish) / tout for reviewing the same bird. Can you only post a review if your rating changes, like it has on Raquel?

Cheers

Monger2468

[DylanPerry]

Hi mate. States on profile she's Brazilian and Italian mixed. Could be reality or could be a marketing ploy. Who knows.

When she started out (which by the way, she has now told me she goes back as far as 2011/12 in the game here...I always thought she was new when I saw her in 2015), I think Brazilian chicks had more of a negative reputation. So it's a possibility that she's just in a habit from back then of mentioning Italian first. Whether it be legitimate or not is another question.


I believe I'm correct in saying you can do multiple reviews under two circumstances:
1) More than 6 months have elapsed since the previous review.
2) The Positive/Neutral/Negative rating has changed.

My previous review was the 24th March, hence I left it a little while to give my new review...so that the 6th months could fully elapse.

Although her score on my ratings improved, she is still a Neutral on the UKP ratings. Thus, I still had to wait for the 6 months


I imagine you gave the same girl two positives within 6 months, which some will jump at and find suspect. But it's an easy mistake if you've never come across or been the rules...which you now have 

[LLPunting]

You are still rating her Neutral so your UKP rating hasn't changed so doesn't warrant a new review.

Also it is 12 months between successive reviews that don't change rating.

12 month limit doesn't apply if you change UKP rating for a substantially different performance/looks

[DylanPerry]

You are still rating her Neutral so your UKP rating hasn't changed so doesn't warrant a new review.

Also it is 12 months between successive reviews that don't change rating.

12 month limit doesn't apply if you change UKP rating for a substantially different performance/looks

Wow, didn't know it's a year.

See Monger2468, how easy it is to not keep up.

[dami3n]

Was told by two other punters that I talk to, that's she lost a lot of weight. Thought it was hyperbole, so ventured to see for myself. They were correct  .

a worthwhile venture it turns out.

she's now fat as opposed to phat in my opinion. Pics are certainly not accurate. There have been questions over the extent of photoshopping in the past, but either way the pics are long out of date at this point.
Her ass, which some regard as somewhat of a USP...while it is large, I am no longer impressed. It is riddled with fat and cellulite now. Just imagine cottage cheese (her skin tone during the winter months making it quite literal).
Decent face (ageing rapidly, looking worse for wear).
Stomach- forget about it. Sidenote, pretty bad C section mark(s) straight across. Her stomach flab actually covers it most of the time/makes it hard to notice.
Arms- flabby chicken wings that could blow in the wind.
Legs- too stumpy even for a BBW or what not. Too wide below the knee.

Long story short, her mileage is near its end. Seems if a WG doesn't lose it mentally, she does so physically.

must have fixed up something nice then and found some mileage while at it ...talk about a cum back

[sparkus]

I saw when she first arrived (she told me years later that was the case), she had a decent bunda but her body was otherwise a lot slimmer than what she became. That said, curvy face suits her as she had buck teeth then (more work done?)

[GameofPunting]

Is she worth a fuck? Haven’t punted in a good two months.

[jon22992]

She looks super sexy OP I think I'll give her a punt and see how it goes cheers for the recommendation.

[S_holmes]

Wow, didn't know it's a year.

See Monger2468, how easy it is to not keep up.

Only one positive review thread can be posted for a service provider by one member per 12 month period, the exception is if the new positive review is for a threesome or more booking. This 12-month restriction only applies to positive reviews, not neutral or negative (they can be posted anytime after a positive review). During the 12-month period a member can add their new positive reviews to their existing review thread in the form of a reply.

[S_holmes]

Reading the above site rules, it appears the 12 month restriction only applies to positive reviews.

Has this changed recently?

[DylanPerry]

Reading the above site rules, it appears the 12 month restriction only applies to positive reviews.

Has this changed recently?

If you copy and pasted those rules surely they're right. Mr LLP was probably just being a bit busy after all.

[LLPunting]

If you copy and pasted those rules surely they're right. Mr LLP was probably just being a bit busy after all.

My bad Axelrod.  If Admin genuinely meant one could post multiple Neutrals or Negatives about an SP, let's ask him to clarify.  I was taking it from the writing successive reviews after a positive angle, i.e. rating had changed, was permissible.

Perhaps Admin never considered a punter would return to a Neutral or Negative and write another review.

I've reported this post (mine) for Admin to respond to and hopefully clarify about multiple reviews of the same rating made within a certain time frame.