Yours_Khloe - London NW1

[yeats68]

External Link/Members Only
Communication was all by text, very straightforward.  Flat is comfortable enough, with well placed mirrors in the room. Shower was fine.

This girl has had a few good reviews but I have said negative so the question of ratings comes up.  Each punter is going to have different expectations and different standards and there have been a number of time when I have read a review which was positive when I would have said it should be a negative, and occasionally vice versa. So for future reference I will explain the standards I am applying. 

Chloe is an attractive Polish girl with one of those 2 size, pear shaped bodies, an 8 above the waste and 12/14 below but definitely a very nice body.  She is in her mid 20s I would say.  She is freindly and welcoming.

So why the negative? Essentially because her profile is false. No FK, the slightest peck on the lips was it. No fingering, and no CIM both of which are listed on her profile. In setting up the punt I had texted her to be clear what the extras might be and she texted back 'all included in the price', so I think it was reasonable to assume the profile was accurate.  It wasn't a bad punt, I have had far worse, but it seems to me if standards are to mean anything then just being friendly and not treating you like shit is not, I think, good enough for a positive. Some might think a neutral would be more fair, but I am going to take the position that if the profile is false then it's an automatic negative. 

[Big Bad R]

Fair play, your review, doesn't sound unreasonable to me 

[The Film Director]

Thanks for the review, OP.  This one seems to have garnered a very mixed response, ratings-wise, but a misrepresented profile definitely is a negative for me. 

[LLPunting]

Thanks for review.  I was similarly underwhelmed by her performance.  Arguably more honest than mentor/flatmate Unique_monica