Author Topic: xRachel_Honeyx - Salford (on tour)  (Read 2244 times)


8 review(s) for xRachel_Honeyx (5 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by NigelF]

Offline NigelF

Link: External Link/Members Only

This girl seems to have mixed reviews on here. She has 2 neutrals but they're both 2 years old and one is just for her no-showing/poor communication. 2 of her positives are also from the same reviewer but they are well over a year apart and from a seemingly reliable punter. Even her positives are a bit mixed with one reviewer experiencing "great DFK" but another (her most recent positive) only getting "a bit of light kissing". I probably should've taken more heed of that, along with her neutral review which unfortunately was fairly similar to what I experienced.

However, I was prompted to give her a try due to the fact that I liked the look of her big tits and she also had a clear face picture up at the time. The face pic was just about enough to swing it for me. She didn't look absolutely amazing but she did look good and I also liked her dyed red hair. The face pic is no longer up and having talked to her briefly about it during the punt, it seems she only put it up briefly to attract more punters (as she was a bit quiet) and because it was unlikely anyone from where she's usually based (Harrogate) would see them. I figured that would be the case, so even though she deliberately posted the face pic publicly (as her main/first picture no less) for all to see (albeit fairly briefly), I'll respect her privacy and I won't post it. However, I'm more than happy to send it to trustworthy and contributing members (i.e. those who've posted a number of helpful reviews) - note that you'll need a punting email address for me to send it to because as far as I'm aware, currently you can't send pics via PM on here.

Comms: I wanted to talk to her on the phone to get a gauge of what she's like before I committed but aside from her profile discouraging it, she didn't pick up. She eventually texted me back (unsolicited, nearly 2 hours after I called her - hence you really need a punting phone in this game) but requested I keep things to text. From this point on her comms were prompt and it was easy to arrange. She agreed to "plenty of DFK" along with OWO so I decided to take the punt.

She promptly confirmed on the day when I asked but upon arrival, despite arriving early and giving her notice, she still made me wait 7 mins after the scheduled meet time until she sent her room number so it was nearly 10 mins late by the time I got there.

Price: £90 for 30 mins (including FK, OWO and sex). Because I've seen almost everyone I'm interested in who's within the "Tontober" price range, I decided to step out of it so I don't miss out on potentially good punts. I feel bad for doing so but only really because this punt wasn't great (if it was positive, unfortunately I doubt I'd have cared that much - to be fair to me though, I have observed Tontober for the past two years correctly).

Location: Cheap hotel in Salford. Commonly used by escorts on tour. It was very basic but it did the job. Given her rates though, you'd expect better.

Looks: Even though her face pic is no longer up, I have to compare her to that because it's one of the reasons I saw her. IMO, she's not as good looking as her face pic, in reality her face is more round (with a less defined jawline), has a small but noticeable double chin and is just generally less flawless. The face pic was probably at least filtered if not airbrushed. She was probably also subtly leaning forward to eliminate the double chin and improve her jawline (a common tactic). I also preferred her hair colour in the pic (however I should've asked to confirm it was still like that). When I saw her, her hair was a much darker red (possibly a mix of black and dark red). Her hair was around shoulder length.

The first line of her profile says 34G natural breasts but her vital statistics (and interview) say 34F. They are definitely natural and I'd say F-G cup is about right. She has big areolas and bigger than average nipples (but not huge). Her tits are somewhat as pictured on her profile but not quite. She did have some fairly minor (but noticeable) stretch marks around the base of her tits and it seemed like the substance of her breast (basically just fat) didn't totally fill the skin/"bags" in which they were contained, this suggests either recent weight loss or probably more likely that she's given birth at some point (obviously because tits get bigger during pregnancy and then return to normal afterwards, sometimes resulting in stretch marks and a bit of loose skin). Funnily enough, assuming she has had children, if she was lactating and able to squirt some nice fresh breast milk into my mouth, I'd probably have given this a positive (yes, I'm a dirty bastard). Anyway, in terms of firmness, they were a little saggy but still fairly good considering their large size. The "sagginess" was more noticeable in missionary where they kind of "collapsed" and fell to the side and it was still noticeable even after I asked her to squeeze them together. I think her tits look better when she's upright or leaning over you.

She's definitely not a size 12 as she claims. She is at least a size 14 (possibly bigger but I think 14 is probably right). She was wearing a black corset type thing and despite it being quite tight (you could see prominent folds of skin around the edges), she still had a noticeable protruding (and off putting) stomach although it wasn't massive. Given that she's also quite tall (for a girl), there's no chance she's smaller than a size 14. Her size obviously isn't shown anywhere near accurately in her pics although that's not too surprising given that she's clearly taken them cleverly and hiding certain parts of her body etc.

Her arse is decent and while it does have some shape/roundness (and is a decent handful), it's relatively flat compared to the rest of her, so a bit disappointing. She claims to be 28 and late 20s to early 30s seems about right. Overall, she had the big tits I was mainly looking for but they weren't as good as I was expecting and I was at least somewhat disappointed with everything else too because her profile and pictures are misleading. I think overall she's decent looking but only a bit above average. She certainly didn't make me feel like walking (although that's also because I'm lazy) but I wasn't thrilled either.

Service: Despite agreeing to "plenty of DFK" beforehand, she made no effort at any point to initiate so I initially had to ask (and later lean in/pull her in every time I wanted it). It was only FK and it wasn't was particularly enthusiastic but it was decent. So basically it wasn't particularly plentiful and it wasn't proper DFK - so that was almost a blatant lie on her part.

Her OWO technique was pretty good, slow and sensual but she didn't get much past half way down (and I'm only an average size) although I didn't ask her to go deeper. In 69, while she was clean on the outside/around her vulva and clit, there was a slight but noticeable "fishy" smell emanating from her vagina. It wasn't too bad but I did cut the 69 short compared to usual for me.

Onto sex and a variety of positions were enjoyed and she was somewhat/mostly enthusiastic but it was a little lacklustre. She did put in a good amount of effort in CG. Towards the end, she did kindly offer to finish me off with her mouth (presumably ending with CIM) but I declined as I wasn't in the mood. 

In doggy and when withdrawing at the end there was again the smell of fish. It definitely wasn't the worst I've smelt but it was noticeable. It's hard to say if it's an outright hygiene issue on her part because the outside was clean and as far as I'm aware it's hard to keep the inside of the vagina clean without making things worse (certainly in the long term). Regardless, it's still her fault/responsibility and it's unacceptable. Possibly she shouldn't be working as it could be a sign of something like bacterial vaginosis (or something similar). You also wouldn't expect it considering the punt was early afternoon.

In terms of attitude/personality she was pleasant and friendly without being particularly warm or enthusiastic. She was basically a bit "low energy". I don't mind that to an extent, as everyone has different styles (and actually I'm a very tolerant guy) but it was too noticeable for my tastes. She did deliver a pretty good massage and she was nice to talk to in the punt but obviously I'm not there to talk and I bet if I'd spoken to her on the phone beforehand, I probably wouldn't have gone ahead with booking.

I didn't feel rushed at any point and I got my full time.

Overall: She oversold (both during comms and with her profile and pictures) but under-delivered and so is clearly overpriced (note that price has almost no impact on my overall rating). I did actually expect some of that (due to her neutral review and because that's what many WG's are like) but that's no excuse. As such, even though I did actually have a fairly satisfactory time and I was going to give this a neutral - since she literally disappointed me (at least a little) in every aspect of the punt and did over-promise so much - it has to be a negative.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2018, 10:37:25 pm by NigelF »

Offline Winterspirit

Your review makes me glad that I couldn’t get my desired time with her last week.  Cheers Nigel.

Offline Licking Lizard

A thorough review, thank you.

It's a pity we can't rate Negative's with a scale.. As much as you feel you had a negative experience, there are many reviews on here that are much more worthy of being classed as a negative.

I'm not having a pop, just saying.

Offline Travis1234

One perhaps to avoid for being overpriced and under delivery of service expected.  Superb review Nigel as ever very thorough and detailed like a Michelin inspector of punting!! So useful for us noviciates. Thnx

Offline HarryZZ

I've seen her in Harrogate about a year ago and saw this review as I'm researching something for later in the week for while I'm over the Pennines on business, I actually thought I'd reviewed her although I can't find it now, it was one of my best punts when I saw her, I guess I caught her on a good day, I had her laid on her back, head over the end of the bed and face fucked her, no half arsed BJ for me, I certainly had no complaints although I have tried to meet her a couple of times since and never been able to, her comms probably aren't the best. I wonder if she's losing interest?

Offline NigelF

Your review makes me glad that I couldn’t get my desired time with her last week.  Cheers Nigel.
One perhaps to avoid for being overpriced and under delivery of service expected.  Superb review Nigel as ever very thorough and detailed like a Michelin inspector of punting!! So useful for us noviciates. Thnx

Cheers  :drinks:

A thorough review, thank you.

It's a pity we can't rate Negative's with a scale.. As much as you feel you had a negative experience, there are many reviews on here that are much more worthy of being classed as a negative.

I'm not having a pop, just saying.

Cheers. Yeah, a scale would be more helpful for judging things overall at a glance but of course the devil is always in the detail and one should always read reviews fully. Back when I used to rate girls overall out of 10 (obviously I never gave out any 10s), I really struggled to find the "correct rating" and regardless of if there's 3 ratings to choose from or 20, I'm sure people will always struggle (including, as a reader, how to interpret them too).

I certainly agree that I've seen reviews that are more worthy of a negative however the fact that we've been able to read them and think that means at least all the important details were all there (as far as we can tell) so the overall rating doesn't really matter, it's the details and content of the review that matter.

Interestingly, I've just posted a positive (see here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=226419.0) but that girl (Layla) shared similar negative aspects to this WG (Rachel) - she had misleading photos, in fact even more misleading than Rachel, despite agreeing to it she didn't deliver proper DFK (but she was still quite a lot better than Rachel regarding FK, see the review) and she also had a minor smell/hygiene issue (although not as bad as Rachel's). Indeed someone has already commented that they would've given her a negative (understandably so). However her enthusiasm was a lot better than Rachel's and also I didn't mind her size so much. I'm usually OK with size 12, whereas with a size 14-16 I have to be more in the right mood, so Rachel was more disappointing in the looks department even though her photos were less misleading although part of it is that Rachel's photos were less revealing in the first place (so in a roundabout way, were almost as misleading as Layla's).

I've seen her in Harrogate about a year ago and saw this review as I'm researching something for later in the week for while I'm over the Pennines on business, I actually thought I'd reviewed her although I can't find it now, it was one of my best punts when I saw her, I guess I caught her on a good day, I had her laid on her back, head over the end of the bed and face fucked her, no half arsed BJ for me, I certainly had no complaints although I have tried to meet her a couple of times since and never been able to, her comms probably aren't the best. I wonder if she's losing interest?

It's hard to say if she's losing interest, her last neutral review was back in November 2016 and the only real change since then seems to be that she's got bigger and she has an issue with her vagina (bacteria/smell). She has had a couple of positives in between though. Perhaps you did catch her on a good day (but of course if I saw her on a "bad day" that's no excuse for her).

Despite this review being a negative, it wasn't a bad punt, it was just disappointing in so many ways (and so too disappointing overall). She was obviously nowhere near one of my best punts and I know loads of girls who are much better in every department however I think it just goes to show how variable things can be, as well as it being very subjective and depending on what you look for/want from a punt.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2018, 11:23:54 pm by NigelF »