.rosa. - Edgware (My first positive TOFTT since Mia Moist)

[Ron89]

External Link/Members Only

First off, this girl is a pump and dump, which shouldn’t take away from the fact that she’s a great punt. She’s a P&D for the following reasons; she doesn’t speak English, she doesn’t do OWO or kissing meaning the overall experience is rather limited. Near burnt oak station, works through the agency topescortbabes.net, maid has good comms with prompt responses via text. Sees around 7 guys a day at the moment so she’s not struggling for business and given her looks/pics I’m not surprised.

Her looks are highlight; if I’m honest I still can’t tell if this was a B&S, the girls look similar if they are different. 7.5/10 facially and a 9/10 body to my tastes. To elaborate she has a pretty Latina face, quite typical, and natural D’s which look awesome. Her arse is also perfect; nowhere near bubble but real meat to it despite her petite 5’1 frame. It recoils very well in doggy and her skin is ridiculously smooth and soft.

Service wise she’s very submissive, let me face fuck and her OW was of a good standard. She can deepthroat at will and I’m endowed. She also suggested doggy almost straight away despite me being hung and her being petite which usually never happens. Most girls go as far to refuse doggy. I moved her around a lot in this position, pushed her head down into the mattress at times then  held her shoulders while fucking her more upright, she was like a doll in terms of being able to man handle her. Her kissing is excellent and proper DFK though costs 20 extra, which I paid because I was very attracted to her.

Spoke a bit using google translate. She’s moving around London until December though she’s only in Edgware until Saturday. Such was my satisfaction that I’m tempted to make another visit before then. Excellent P&D and highly recommended.

[Stortford]

Says Spanish south American?

[Ron89]

Says Spanish south American?

From Dominican Republic

[Cumberland]

Face photo captured....

Hidden Image/Members Only

[kasamaa]

Face photo captured....

Hidden Image/Members Only

She looks a lot older in the veri pic than the profile pic.....

[LLPunting]

Thanks for review 

And this is why scores out of ten are a waste of time for me.

Hidden Image/Members Only  7/10 face, 9/10 body

Hidden Image/Members Only 6/10 face, 7/10 body

Hidden Image/Members Only  5/10 face, 6/10 body

Some of you may recognise the 2nd and 3rd ladies.

[Sinz]

+447459040237
07459040237

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

[abikeman]

Thanks for review 

And this is why scores out of ten are a waste of time for me.

Hidden Image/Members Only  7/10 face, 9/10 body

Hidden Image/Members Only 6/10 face, 7/10 body

Hidden Image/Members Only  5/10 face, 6/10 body

Some of you may recognise the 2nd and 3rd ladies.
[/quote

Don’t get it? Are these fake photos? Or is point that everyone rates differently?

[mrhappypants]

£120 ph for misrepresented covered service.

[LLPunting]

Don’t get it? Are these fake photos? Or is point that everyone rates differently?

All are/were SPs.

Point is scores out of ten are subjective without common reference points.  If we had a separate wiki where each punter posted faces and bodies to represent 1-10 for them that might be useful when they subsequently rate an SP the rest of us are interested in. 

[Ron89]

All are/were SPs.

Point is scores out of ten are subjective without common reference points.  If we had a separate wiki where each punter posted faces and bodies to represent 1-10 for them that might be useful when they subsequently rate an SP the rest of us are interested in.

I guess it’s about following punters who seem trustworthy, share your tastes and have a decent track record. Everyone likes different things.

[Bassman]

Whats the parking situation like around there OP?

[Ron89]

Whats the parking situation like around there OP?

Plentiful which was a nice surprise

[last_days_of_logan]

cant see an arse anywhere in the pics to be honest

Good review though OP

[james08]

Helpful review man.
Thinking of visting her for my my first punt as shes local to where I live. I'm new to punting, so this may be a silly question, but as she visits about 7 guys a day as you say, can you request she showers or at least uses mouthwash during the visit, or would escorts get offended. I've read many reviews here of escorts, who seem to opperate in conveyor fashion, & I dont want to kiss a girl after shes just previosly sucked off some other dude, so would like to see her at least mouthwash in front of me.
Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks.

[Bassman]

Helpful review man.
Thinking of visting her for my my first punt as shes local to where I live. I'm new to punting, so this may be a silly question, but as she visits about 7 guys a day as you say, can you request she showers or at least uses mouthwash during the visit, or would escorts get offended. I've read many reviews here of escorts, who seem to opperate in conveyor fashion, & I dont want to kiss a girl after shes just previosly sucked off some other dude, so would like to see her at least mouthwash in front of me.
Any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks.

You can request it. Whether she will or not is another matter.

I requested it once and the WG went all flipmode on me lol.

[mrhappypants]

All are/were SPs.

Point is scores out of ten are subjective without common reference points.  If we had a separate wiki where each punter posted faces and bodies to represent 1-10 for them that might be useful when they subsequently rate an SP the rest of us are interested in.

Been done - for faces at least.

External Link/Members Only)

Did not solve anything.  I thought it a good attempt but someone always wants to tear it down....

, & I dont want to kiss a girl after shes just previosly sucked off some other dude

Don’t punt?

[james08]

You can request it. Whether she will or not is another matter.

I requested it once and the WG went all flipmode on me lol.

Thanks for the reply mate. Thats what I was concerned about, the girl going flipmode & then potentially providing a shit service.
Probably will still ask any escort I visit to mouthwash, if she refuses just won't kiss her.

[LLPunting]

Been done - for faces at least.

External Link/Members Only)

Did not solve anything.  I thought it a good attempt but someone always wants to tear it down....

Don’t punt?

Yeah, unsurprising given the commitment required

[JayEZ2K]

And this is why scores out of ten are a waste of time for me...

Thanks for clarifying. Numerical scores are a fast way to simplify the info, which is useful when re-reviewing your own reviews, or if someone has the same tastes as you. But I see your point that it's difficult to quantitatively score something as subjective as looks. So the best method is to describe them ("wide hips, firm breasts, as in photos", etc). I always do the later, but used to experiment with including numerical scores.

Thanks for reviewing, Ron, and glad you had a good punt. I think she had a different profile, also showing her with the black beanie (B&W photo in a bar), which I had on my HL.
Did she look more like the beanie photo or the verification photo? Skin colour and even the eye colour is different in those photos. But facial shape is similar.

[mrhappypants]

Thanks for clarifying. Numerical scores are a fast way to simplify the info, which is useful when re-reviewing your own reviews, or if someone has the same tastes as you. But I see your point that it's difficult to quantitatively score something as subjective as looks. So the best method is to describe them ("wide hips, firm breasts, as in photos", etc). I always do the later, but used to experiment with including numerical scores.

Thanks for reviewing, Ron, and glad you had a good punt. I think she had a different profile, also showing her with the black beanie (B&W photo in a bar), which I had on my HL.
Did she look more like the beanie photo or the verification photo? Skin colour and even the eye colour is different in those photos. But facial shape is similar.

Fine grain I agree a rating is not helpful. 

However, as a rule of thumb saying Delux Delia and Arina Porn are physically a 9 hopefully conveys to the reader “I struggled to tear my eyes away from her body and the urge to see her naked was near overwhelming.”  Similarly, Brigitte at a 6, “I was not attracted to her and the punt was successful for service rather than looks. 

7 “I would chat her up in a bar”

8 “I would want to look twice in the street”

Jason’s scale overanalysed it.  I have punted 5’s twice and will not do it again.

[horsa]

All are/were SPs.

Point is scores out of ten are subjective without common reference points.  If we had a separate wiki where each punter posted faces and bodies to represent 1-10 for them that might be useful when they subsequently rate an SP the rest of us are interested in.

who is the first one?

[Ron89]

Shipped to Peckham the poor girl. Didn’t get round to revisiting in the end

[LLPunting]

who is the first one?

She's been gone 10 years but still one of the best natural bodies I ever enjoyed, not that her face and lips weren't very much fun either.  She was with one of the EE agencies but we enjoyed some private times together also.

[LLPunting]

Fine grain I agree a rating is not helpful. 

However, as a rule of thumb saying Delux Delia and Arina Porn are physically a 9 hopefully conveys to the reader “I struggled to tear my eyes away from her body and the urge to see her naked was near overwhelming.”  Similarly, Brigitte at a 6, “I was not attracted to her and the punt was successful for service rather than looks. 

7 “I would chat her up in a bar”

8 “I would want to look twice in the street”

Jason’s scale overanalysed it.  I have punted 5’s twice and will not do it again.

But your scoring is still subjective.
Me telling you I'd chat a girl up because I thought her attractive means nothing unless conversant with my taste.  She could have an una brow, gappy teeth, a lazy eye,  uneven ears, crewcut hair and my little pony tats around her neck, all atop a lean beanpole body with large feet, small hands,  fried eggs, hairy nethers and a spotty arse.
I've shagged a number of sub-5s in the face or body department but they've been good performers and worthy of repeats if you want a passionate tussle with a very responsive and receptive pussy, arse or mouth.
We know there are many varied tastes being satisfied here, it only makes sense to describe with adjectives not pad-cyphered shorthand.

[king tarzan]

All are/were SPs.

Point is scores out of ten are subjective without common reference points.  If we had a separate wiki where each punter posted faces and bodies to represent 1-10 for them that might be useful when they subsequently rate an SP the rest of us are interested in.

Who is the 1st blonde?

Looks very tasty..👅👅👅👅👅

[mrhappypants]

But your scoring is still subjective.

Of course it is, but you know, like many on here, that if I say a girl is an 8 or a 9 she is going to be hot.  It is just my opinion and others might rate her differently but it at least signals something of my experience of her.  I know that my mental rating scale was calibrated in the same way as several other reviewers on here and that suggests a common language.  Not common to all I grant you but there are several punters here whose taste I do not understand and whose reviews I weigh accordingly.

Me telling you I'd chat a girl up because I thought her attractive means nothing unless conversant with my taste.  She could have an una brow, gappy teeth, a lazy eye,  uneven ears, crewcut hair and my little pony tats around her neck, all atop a lean beanpole body with large feet, small hands,  fried eggs, hairy nethers and a spotty arse.

I envy you; if that is the kind of women you find attractive it will save you a lot of money in your punting, but I have to say I will bear it in mind when I read your reviews.   

I've shagged a number of sub-5s in the face or body department

BTW the fact that you can refer to her as a "sub 5" and we both know what you mean kinda undermines your point.  I won't bore you with a long rant on the efficacy of ratings and the debate between 5 and 7 point likert scales - just to say anything that increases the detail (and hopefully accuracy) of descriptions of physical appearance helps us all.  It is generally a weak area in most reviews in my opinion.

[horsa]

She's been gone 10 years but still one of the best natural bodies I ever enjoyed, not that her face and lips weren't very much fun either.  She was with one of the EE agencies but we enjoyed some private times together also.

I take it she was from EE? looks like a Nordic Blonde Scandinavian

[JayEZ2K]

I have punted 5’s twice and will not do it again.

Only 5's and only twice? I've made the mistake of punting much lower than that, a few times. Goes to show the importance of stringent qualification.

But your scoring is still subjective...

Good point. That's why descriptive is the most accurate: "As in photos." Or "Not as in photos. 40+ years old. Saggy breasts, cellulite ass. At least 14 stone."

[LLPunting]

I take it she was from EE? looks like a Nordic Blonde Scandinavian

Can't remember if she was from Riga or Odessa.  She was dark blonde when we were enjoying each other, the photo is something she sent after leaving the UK.

[LLPunting]

Of course it is, but you know, like many on here, that if I say a girl is an 8 or a 9 she is going to be hot.  It is just my opinion and others might rate her differently but it at least signals something of my experience of her.  I know that my mental rating scale was calibrated in the same way as several other reviewers on here and that suggests a common language. 
...

BTW the fact that you can refer to her as a "sub 5" and we both know what you mean kinda undermines your point.  I won't bore you with a long rant on the efficacy of ratings and the debate between 5 and 7 point likert scales - just to say anything that increases the detail (and hopefully accuracy) of descriptions of physical appearance helps us all.  It is generally a weak area in most reviews in my opinion.

If a punter is scoring looks then there's no experience to that, it's just geometry or lack of and how good it looks to him.
If a punter is scoring performance then that reflects how she made him feel; a combination of her looks effect on him, behaviour, chemistry and how she felt to touch, which is a very moveable feast with so many combinations getting the same score e.g. prettier to him but a bit more icy and a little tight; not as pretty, but warmer and wetter and snug; etc.

Being similar in taste to several excludes thousands of others.

I wasn't referring to this SP as a sub-5 (although photogenically to me she's 5 or 6 in face, 5 body but that's because I'm not fond of big thighs, big asses and thick bodies, see what I mean) and i have shagged less attractive girls who've been fun in the sack and overall would rate a 7/10 VFM experience, worth a repeat as a plan C.  This blends looks, performance and price.

No idea why you think it undermines my point as it confirms that scores are subjective as all (London) men don't have a common uniform scale of measuring female attractiveness.

Example:
Scoring Naomi Campbell a 9/10 instead of 10 or 8 just means that a guy might like bigger tits or a flatter nose or softer curves or tighter butt or prefer another race.  Me I'd give her a 10.  But then I'd give Heidi Klum an 11, Kelly Brook 8, Faye Tozer on Strictly 8, Zhang Ziyi 9, etc

[mrhappypants]

Hi LLP

I think we are at cross purposes.  As the guide to review writing advises, I treat appearance and service separately.  I usually rate face, physique but not service (as you say, too subjective). In my opinion many reviews confuse looks and service when I think they are better treated independently. 

[LLPunting]

Hi LLP

I think we are at cross purposes.  As the guide to review writing advises, I treat appearance and service separately.  I usually rate face, physique but not service (as you say, too subjective). In my opinion many reviews confuse looks and service when I think they are better treated independently.

Yes, I wasn't intending to characterise you "you", I was talking to the collective "you".  Your point is part of my point to why I don't ascribe much point to scoring.  Point made?  Horrible pun over hopefully...