Brit-Abigail West London

[Listerine]

External Link/Members Only


I saw her a little while ago and have been pondering what rating to give and finally plumped for a neutral.

The positives:

Pretty girl with a fabulous figure.
Intelligent and could hold a good conversation.
Warm if a little shy.
Oral was good if brief.

It started well with her stroking me on the bed and we got down to kissing. This is where it started to go a little flat. Kissing was perfunctory, despite me having showered and cleaned my teeth and it was clear she was not keen on being touched. When my hands started to rove she put them firmly where she wanted them.

Oral (wo) was good although again it was very brief and she just wanted to get onto the main act. No more kissing on the menu and she also doesn't allow RO.

Sex was pleasant but again it felt like she was going through the motions. I think she probably isn't a natural for this industry and it doesn't come naturally.

I had a decent time with a very attractive woman but because of her reluctance to properly engage I left feeling £200 poorer and a bit disappointed.

Maybe we just didn't connect?

[Fuzzyduck]

Thanks for the review and welcome to UKP.
Was her hourly rate cheaper when you saw her? It's £250 now.

Quite frankly, for that kind of money I expect a WG to be all over me and to deliver her stated services with enthusiasm and effort. You didn't get anywhere near that by the sounds of it. Not keen on being touched? FFS, she's a whore. A generous neutral.

[Listerine]

Hi

Thanks for the welcome

No I got her at the old rate of £200. I think maybe I have been generous. I've never had my hands moved before! It wasn't even as if I was fingering her roughly this was just touching her body generally.

I also wonder whether she was expecting me to cum more than once in an hour as there were 3 condoms on the bed when we started. I'm strictly a once in an hour man.

[midlandz_boy88]

I paid 220 was lower b4. I managed to cum twice.

[Listerine]

Hi Midland

You had a better experience than me by the sound of it?

Was she fussy in any way with you about touching etc.?

[bestbefore]

Quite frankly, for that kind of money I expect a WG to be all over me and to deliver her stated services with enthusiasm and effort. You didn't get anywhere near that by the sounds of it. Not keen on being touched? FFS, she's a whore. A generous neutral.

I agree, for those prices attitude and services offered should be gold standard. It really pisses me off when I read a review of an expensive girl who doesn't deliver. There are plenty of great girls out there for about £100 - £130 and who are well reviewed on here so I think to pay nearly twice as much for less makes no sense.

[midlandz_boy88]

Hi Midland

You had a better experience than me by the sound of it?

Was she fussy in any way with you about touching etc.?

No wasnt fussy, i hugged her. Felt her legs. Fondled while on bed. In between rounds we were touching. She was keen to make me cum for second round. Kissing was as soon as i walked in. Even kissed on way out.

[Listerine]

 No touching between the legs, wasn't keen on me touching breasts. I'm not rough and never had this before. Very odd?