welsh.tattoo.sophie Reading

[Jimmy1771]

External Link/Members Only

Have to admit I’ve been reading on this website for a while, but haven’t yet contributed anything. I’m newish to this game, started about a year ago, and have seen around 25 different girls in that year. 90% of the girls I’ve seen have been positive experiences thanks to reading the reviews on here first, so I thought I’d give something back to the forum by recommending some of the best girls I’ve seen.

Fee and time. £130 for 1 hour last week.

Comms. Very good with this girl, I prefer to phone girls first, and she answered right away and confirmed a booking with me, she then texted me through the address, which is easy to find and close to the centre of Reading.

Location. A 5 min walk from Reading town centre, in a maisonette style house. It’s down abit of a dead end, but I never encountered any nosey neighbours.

Sophie is about the age she says she is, and is a solid 8/10 to look at. She is pretty with a nice figure. She has quite a lot of tattoos, and is very much a rock chick. I know this may not be to everyone’s taste, but it’s not something that bothers me either way.

Service. Her service was excellent to be fair, she offered me a shower and a drink when I arrived, and was very friendly. She was very enthusiastic when she got down to business. She gave very good OWO, all mouth action. Sex was good, she likes DFK during sex which always makes things feel more intimate, and she knows a lot of good moves when she’s on top. Made me cum twice in a hour session, which is about as good as it gets for me, as a lot of girls can only get me to finish once in an hour. And no girls ever managed 3 with me in an hour.

At £130 an hour I would say she is very good value, and maybe a little bit underpriced in the current market. I’ve paid 160 and 170 for girls who have given knowhere near as good a service. So yeah I would return again.

[king tarzan]

she tours near me sometimes, nice face and body but tattoos just put me off from seeing her..

there is IMHO a distinction between a few classy tattoo's and complete all over the body tacky tattoo's far as women are concerned..
and she is certainly the latter..

[Cunning Punt]

At £130 an hour I would say she is very good value, and maybe a little bit underpriced in the current market. I’ve paid 160 and 170 for girls who have given knowhere near as good a service.

First-time review where you're glowing about a prossie and saying she's worth so much more. 

Either you're a tout and stupid or a genuine punter and fucking stupid. You do realise you're on a punters' forum? 

Even if it were true, you wouldn't openly say a car dealer should be charging more for a car, would you?

And it's utter rubbish anyway - she is certainly not underpriced and £170 is silly money in most guys' books.

You say you're new so perhaps you'll wise up a bit. If you read some reviews here and get help from other punters by writing a few more reviews yourself, then you will realise there is NO correlation between service and price.

[thor555]

i have seen her a few time once reviewed, £120 is about right still think £90 for 30mins is a lot!
She is good but like above dont think you would go into a pub and say that pint is great you should charge £10 for that.
Think she is priced ok at the moment may be a little on the high side right now.

[Jimmy1771]

A WG is not going to increase her prices based on me saying she is good value on here. I’d guess a WG prices are set based on how much business they are getting.

As for the other accusation, do I really need to tout a girl who has 37 positive reviews on here already?

I’m just a genuine punter like the rest of you guys, and didn’t post on here to start an argument.

[DrConners]

Mixed bag of responses here Jim !!! 

Newish members jumping straight in with a 'very' positive review can often get a few questions fielded their way, I think mostly it's to question your credability as a new member - I'm sure you understand.

If you take the time to read some of her other reviews you'll see CP had a really shit punt with her so I guess I can understand him making his point - she's clearly not an amazing service provider all the time & maybe you just clicked with her or got her on a good day.

Or your in some way connected with her - It doesn't really matter at the moment - If you get time to post some more reviews that would be great - Far be it from me to offer advice but just be objective & honest mate - it pays dividends.

None of her profile links posted above are working - So she's currently given it legs ? 

Take a read of this too if you get a minute 

External Link/Members Only

[Cunning Punt]

you'll see CP had a really shit punt with her so I guess I can understand him making his point

The fact I had a shit punt with her didn't come into it as I realise a lot of guys have had good punts with her and that me (and a few others) could have been unfortunate.

I would have made the same point to the OP whoever he had been reviewing.

A WG is not going to increase her prices based on me saying she is good value on here. I’d guess a WG prices are set based on how much business they are getting.

As for the other accusation, do I really need to tout a girl who has 37 positive reviews on here already?

I’m just a genuine punter like the rest of you guys, and didn’t post on here to start an argument.

I'm afraid if guys go round saying WGs should raise their prices then it does give them/maids/Sergei ideas. It does happen and it's just not a great idea on a punter's forum and also many of us would not consider £160/£170 the going rate for a decent punt

I didn't make two accusations as such, it was either/or.

We'll look forward to your forthcoming reviews. As Dr Conners says, there is some good advice, effectively site rules, on the Punting Wiki, including point 5. Even though you didn't say 'should' the principle applies.

Things NOT to Say
5.She is so good she should raise her price. You do not know an escort's business model, you are a punter. Raising prices might not help her. Also, UKP represents the interests of punters and any statement that encourages price rises is counter to the principles of the board.