Author Topic: Hot Young Camilla - Marylebone  (Read 1959 times)


19 review(s) for Yours_Honey (15 positive, 1 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Davey Dykes]

Offline Jaysee54

External Link/Members Only

This is a reluctant negative - I say reluctant because Camilla is welcoming, chatty and, for me, she is physically top notch. The reason for the negative is that I’ve seen her twice now and both times felt rushed and mechanical. Get in, get the job done and get out.

Comms were easy - text her asking if she was available at short notice and confirmed a 30 min in call inside the hour at £80.

This took place a few weeks ago at a place in Marylebone. Looks like she has moved on now but for what it’s worth, the flat was in a bit of a dodgy estate 5 mins from the station. I probably wouldn’t want to be wandering around after dark. Inside was nice - modern, light and clean.

Entered the flat with Camilla behind the door and turned to see her looking great in a red lingerie set. She looked stunning - dark hair, dark eyes and a really pretty face. She’s medium height and her body is just what I like. Tits are full and firm and not too big, she has an amazing arse, not quite bubble butt but thick and well proportioned. Greeted me with a smile but no kiss, offered me a drink of water and a shower, both of which I accepted as we were still in the middle of a heatwave!

Returned from the shower (bathroom clean and well stocked) to find her in the bedroom, some more light FK, fondling, undressing then she dropped to her knees for OWO. She delivers a sloppy wet blow job which I like, and she was going quite deep but it was very fast, so I asked her to slow down. A couple of minutes go by and she asks if I want a condom. Not yet. Moved on to the bed and still feels good but she is picking up the pace again, no variation and no eye contact. I manoeuvre her around for 69 and she gets herself into a position that really limits my access. She’s not moving at all and not responsive at all, no fingers but I knew that from the first time.

I started to get a bit frustrated/bored at this point so on with the mac and she climbs on top for CG. She looks great bouncing on top of me but there’s not much else going on, a few pecks and still not much eye contact. Moved on to reverse CG and doggy, after a bit of a pounding I finished in the mac. She cleaned me up then jumped off the bed to dispose of it in the kitchen area, poured herself a glass of water then started checking her phone!

I wandered out there and was making some small talk then I just decided to have another shower and fuck off. Including two quick showers, I reckon I was in and out within 25 mins. Whilst she is a good looking girl with a great body, and fairly welcoming and chatty that was the second time I left there feeling like I’d wasted my money. She delivered all the services listed and requested but it felt like her only goal was to get me out as quickly as possible. Oh well, on to the next one.


Offline Richdina

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 29
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
You should always give a negative review with a heavy  heart knowing a girls livelihood is at stake. I nearly dismissed her when I saw the red mist of your negativity. Then I decided to look beyond your review and she had many 'Wow" reviews. We can all have a bad day and perhaps you could have found it in your heart to give her a neautral or were you reviewing yourself!
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

Offline kasamaa

You should always give a negative review with a heavy  heart knowing a girls livelihood is at stake. I nearly dismissed her when I saw the red mist of your negativity. Then I decided to look beyond your review and she had many 'Wow" reviews. We can all have a bad day and perhaps you could have found it in your heart to give her a neautral or were you reviewing yourself!

If OP's experience was negative then he should rate negative.

Like any business, theres bad and good days and both give an overall picture of standards and consistency. More bad days than good indicate a poor standard and vice versa indicates an overall good one.

At the end of the day you wasnt there, only the OP knows how he felt and so trying to influence a poster to change their rating is a negative for me.

Offline Richdina

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 29
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Fair comment, however she was beautiful, chatty and offered him water and he even got two showers out of the punt. Read between the lines and it was he, himself who was frustrated and bored and once again I might suggest he was reviewing himself and not the girl.
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

Robbiebucks

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Fair comment, however she was beautiful, chatty and offered him water and he even got two showers out of the punt. Read between the lines and it was he, himself who was frustrated and bored and once again I might suggest he was reviewing himself and not the girl.

If I wanted two showers and a glass of water, I’d stay at home and have a wank. Save myself some money.

OP describes a physically stunning woman who is obviously disinterested in the time spent with the punter, going through the motions and relying on her photos to get more work.

Whilst I agree that all negatives should be with heavy heart, but you sound like her charming white knight protecting her business! If the OP felt it was a negative experience... it’s a negative review.

Offline Mr Girth

I've met Camila twice in the past month (reviews to follow). I can see where the OP is coming from but it's a tricky one.

I felt a bit rushed the first time (partly because i arrived a little late) but I also think she is just generally enthusiastic. Far better having to ask her to slow down than having an unethusiastic girl.

My own review to follow soon but she's still on my hot list and I'll likely return.

Offline The Film Director

If I wanted two showers and a glass of water, I’d stay at home and have a wank. Save myself some money.

OP describes a physically stunning woman who is obviously disinterested in the time spent with the punter, going through the motions and relying on her photos to get more work.

Whilst I agree that all negatives should be with heavy heart, but you sound like her charming white knight protecting her business! If the OP felt it was a negative experience... it’s a negative review.

+1 - not even sure the twat is a punter - no reviews  :thumbsdown:

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,312
  • Likes: 182
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Fair comment, however she was beautiful, chatty and offered him water and he even got two showers out of the punt. Read between the lines and it was he, himself who was frustrated and bored and once again I might suggest he was reviewing himself and not the girl.

Take care, you are sounding like a habitual White Knight.  There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with OPs review.  The ONLY person who should be concerned with the SP's livelihood is the SP.  If she's incapable of tailoring her actions to what the client requests or responds to then she is a poor SP.  She may not have found the OP attractive or took a dislike to something about him in which case she was "managing" the situation in a callous fashion.  We've all had that and all should have rightly reviewed negatively as it is again indicative of a poor service ethic.

Given you have reviewed NO-ONE in 3 years (congrats on your anniversary) you have been with-holding on Positives and Negatives (and Neutrals) in contempt of this community.  Best you attend to your reputation rather than OP's or keep holding your tongue.

Online PLeisure

Take care, you are sounding like a habitual White Knight.  There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with OPs review.  The ONLY person who should be concerned with the SP's livelihood is the SP.  If she's incapable of tailoring her actions to what the client requests or responds to then she is a poor SP.  She may not have found the OP attractive or took a dislike to something about him in which case she was "managing" the situation in a callous fashion.  We've all had that and all should have rightly reviewed negatively as it is again indicative of a poor service ethic.

Given you have reviewed NO-ONE in 3 years (congrats on your anniversary) you have been with-holding on Positives and Negatives (and Neutrals) in contempt of this community.  Best you attend to your reputation rather than OP's or keep holding your tongue.
Makes a change from his fascination with Renata_4_u  :rolleyes:

Offline Jaysee54

You should always give a negative review with a heavy  heart knowing a girls livelihood is at stake. I nearly dismissed her when I saw the red mist of your negativity. Then I decided to look beyond your review and she had many 'Wow" reviews. We can all have a bad day and perhaps you could have found it in your heart to give her a neautral or were you reviewing yourself!

Review of myself?! What are you on about? It’s a balanced report in my opinion and anyone taking the time to read it might consider my reasons for the negative and think ‘fuck that, doesn’t bother me, I’ll book her any way’. Hardly putting her livliehood at stake.

What I didn’t include was that the first meeting was similar but I decided to see her again because of the positives I mentioned. Ultimately the experience was the same though, I felt she was going through the motions and rushing me out the door. And if I was ugly, dirty or rude she wouldn’t have agreed to see me again.

Any way, fact remains - it was my experience,  it’s my review, it’s fair and it’s a negative

Offline Richdina

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 29
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Ok point made. It's your call and I meant no harm.
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

Stortford

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Fair comment, however she was beautiful, chatty and offered him water and he even got two showers out of the punt. Read between the lines and it was he, himself who was frustrated and bored and once again I might suggest he was reviewing himself and not the girl.
He got 2 shower's out of the punt :yahoo:

Online The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,397
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
You should always give a negative review with a heavy  heart knowing a girls livelihood is at stake. I nearly dismissed her when I saw the red mist of your negativity. Then I decided to look beyond your review and she had many 'Wow" reviews. We can all have a bad day and perhaps you could have found it in your heart to give her a neautral or were you reviewing yourself!



Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Jaysee54

He got 2 shower's out of the punt :yahoo:

I can deal with no CIM but only one shower is a deal breaker for me  :D

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Whilst I agree that all negatives should be with heavy heart, but you sound like her charming white knight protecting her business! If the OP felt it was a negative experience... it’s a negative review.

I don't agree, emotions and reviews are best not mixing, I cannot imagine reviewing a neg with a heavy heart.   :crazy:

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,312
  • Likes: 182
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
I don't agree, emotions and reviews are best not mixing, I cannot imagine reviewing a neg with a heavy heart.   :crazy:

Indeed, emotions shouldn't be taking you into a punt especially when the indicators at introduction are you should bail.   And the only concerns you should have after a dalliance that goes badly is making sure you don't fall for it again and she doesn't catch the rest of us unawares.

Robbiebucks

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I don't agree, emotions and reviews are best not mixing, I cannot imagine reviewing a neg with a heavy heart.   :crazy:

Sorry. It was meant to come across as in a heavy heart/annoyed rather than being emotional, due to that fact we just wasted our time and money... you are right no room for emotions
« Last Edit: August 22, 2018, 07:54:27 am by Robbiebucks »