Sexy Gabby Touring South Kensington

[vw]

I always thought the first rule of punting was never to mention services offered that aren't on an escorts likes list.

First rule?   

Hardly first, nice attempt at white knighting though. 

[Cuntminion]

First rule?   

Hardly first, nice attempt at white knighting though.

I don't know what the fuck it was it absolutely had no shared context with anything

First rule my arse

It's nice to know the owls playbook in a similar situation though

[vw]

I don't know what the fuck it was it absolutely had no shared context with anything

First rule my arse

It's nice to know the owls playbook in a similar situation though

So the white owl is saying if he is offered bareback ever his first rule is not to share that info..

[Cuntminion]

So the white owl is saying if he is offered bareback ever his first rule is not to share that info..

The first rule of his punting playbook that exists for no one else that disregards situational context

[Cuntminion]

And if my comments are read by any sp and they don't like them according to the owls guidebook could lead to sp blacklisting

Fucking good

I don't like being in those positions so that'll work out fine

[vw]

And if my comments are read by any sp and they don't like them according to the owls guidebook could lead to sp blacklisting

Fucking good

I don't like being in those positions so that'll work out fine

Well if a girl offers extras that you want, it is best to keep it quiet just like extra time, certainly is not first rule. 

[Cuntminion]

Well if a girl offers extras that you want, it is best to keep it quiet just like extra time, certainly is not first rule.

Well that's between SP's and their clients I've always detested any person that brags about anything extra accepted in a goading way

It is unfair to the sp and provocative to others

But if owl alludes this is the case here, its not

[NigelF]

I disagree. I understand she wants to prove her point. And she has avoided the specifics this time. But what if there is someone else who has a bad punt. I didn't have a good time. But I will think twice about posting a review. In fact I won't so that she doesn't know who I am. That way no one will know my punting name. This is not helpful to the forum in general. Or I will change details or post it way after the punt.

I take it you're making a general point and it's not really the screenshots that have prompted your decision (as you've already said that you use a punting phone and name so surely nothing important is at risk). Anyway, there are numerous things you can do to hide your identity in the review - either search the forum or feel free to ask.

If you still don't want to review, I think it's extremely poor that you haven't elaborated on why you didn't have a good time. Leaving other punters without important information very much goes against the ethos of this site and reflects poorly on your posts/reviews. I'm sure you wouldn't appreciate someone failing to do a negative review which may well have prevented you having a poor time.

[vikingjoe]

Never judge a book by its cover!

[vw]

Never judge a book by its cover!

Thats a bit random.   

[Ladypleaser]

Well apologies on my part 20 minutes as thought meet was at 240 still I texted a reasonable time before the booking and had radio silence even an acknowledgment would of been nice and I was short of walking

Out of courtesy I left one point off that made me feel uncomfortable in the booking so if you want to go the direction of mitigating every point I'll throw that in too

Care to elaborate?

[Waterhouse]

Care to elaborate?

Read the thread, Coma has already elaborated.