Camilla - Escort Scotland - Glasgow

[DaVINCI]

External Link/Members Only

Due to slim pickings, I looked at the punting graveyard of Escort Scotland, the reviews on here and on Escort Scotland (I know, take them with a pinch of salt) I decided Camilla maybe a good choice.

Comms: Early morning l tried to call, no answer, then sent text requesting booking which was replied to immediatly. Meeting was setup for later in the afternoon and was advised to call once I was next to a prominent building on the street. Got flat number and all straightforward.

Location: Central Glasgow, 5 minutes East of Queen Street, cheap parking near by, apartment on the main road, discreet enough, the flat was clean, comfortable and had message table as well as bed in the bedroom. Shower was good. 

Price:  Advertised £100 for 45 minutes, Additional £30 for round 2

Services: FK, DFK, OWO, HJ, protected sex in Mish

The WG: Latin origin, Dark Hair, attractive (although she has prominent mole on her left cheek which was not off-putting) great figure, early 30's, tall around 5ft 7,  Large Breasts. Speaks good English.

The Punt: Arrived at flat, Camilla was wearing a figure hugging all in one PVC outfit with High Heels and looked attractive. Handed over paperwork and I requested a quick shower. In the shower, I could hear talking and although I did not see the other person (it turns out she has a other SP who offers massage?)

Into bedroom, it was immediately into FK, DFK then onto the bed and Camilla started giving very good OWO, licking the shaft, balls etc and also tried to slip a finger in but I wasn't into that. I enjoyed myself that much that I hadn't agreed where to offload, therefore she HJ at the very finish onto my stomach  .

She then cleaned me up and this is were the meeting started going downhill,  The SP turned round and said to me "what are we going to do now" l said "what do you mean" she said "it is only come once", apparently this was whether it was 30, 45 or 60 minute booking. To come twice it was an additional £30, although there was no mention of this extra cost on her profile. It also mentioned that old chestnut "you are paying for my time" there. I said to the SP, it was not on her profile and she should have told me before the start if it was such an issue, she said "l should have asked" which l thought was quite cheeky. 

I paid the additional fee as within myself l was greatful to have the opportunity for round 2. Although, l felt, if l had known prior to the booking l may have not booked her as her rates were high already at £100 for 45 mins and £150 for 60 mins.

As I was not ready for round 2, I continued talking to Camilla about various topics Scotland, Spain, studies etc and she is easy to get on.

When I wanted to start round 2, I found this had put a dampener on proceedings and initially couldn't rise to the occasion but Camilla started fingering / playing with herself which got me good to go again.

We continued DFK, me playing and sucking on her tits then into mish position which I had noticed Camilla had position her thighs in a way that I could not get full access. I am average length therefore I did not understand this, I was going request she go on top but by this time I was getting annoyed with the whole situation, I just wanted it over and managed to finish in mish.

A shower was offered but I polity refused as I was wanting to get on my way. 

Summary:  Camilla is an attractive SP but I have subsequently noticed another Punter claim she is using photos that are not her but of an Argentinian model but sometimes she will add in a photo of herself,  I do not understand why she needs to use fake photos  there is no need for this. Also, she should be upfront about her come twice policy and put this on her profile. I found Camilla attractive and easy to talk to but at premium rates, I want better service than what was on offer. 

Visit Again: No

[The Man With No Name]

Summary:  Camilla is an attractive SP but I have subsequently noticed another Punter claim she is using photos that are not her but of an Argentinian model but sometimes she will add in a photo of herself,  I do not understand why she needs to use fake photos  there is no need for this. Also, she should be upfront about her come twice policy and put this on her profile. I found Camilla attractive and easy to talk to but at premium rates, I want better service than what was on offer. 

Are these the supposed fake pics, you speak of? https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=420.msg97358#msg97358 Hard to tell, as none of these reviews are indexed. I've also read the same complaints, but dunno if it's the same thread you speak of.

She's been mixing these older images with newer, self-snaps (that are definitely her in her flat) over that last couple of years, when her profile's up. Point being, even if the older, dubious pics aren't actually her, they're still pretty representative (when slightly darker skin tone's the biggest difference, you've little to worry about), as most could probably tell when comparing them to the others.

I've always found her very attractive. Says she's Spanish and pretty sure she mentioned something about Valencia. But I'd guess she's South American of some sort, (or of at least that extraction) with that sexy, semi-indigenous look that girls from that neck of the woods tend to have. Last time I saw her around 7 months ago was actually probably the fittest and trimmest I've seen her. Face isn't as good as her smoking hot, almost-perfect, natural Latin curves and tits, but still pretty enough. Very young-looking I find. Could almost pass for the age-old cliché of an actress with the body of 27 year-old stripper, cast as a sexually precocious "Don't Stand So Close to Me" school-girl in a trashy film. Think Denise Richards in Wild Things - not in terms of looks obviously, but very much the concept. Especially when she wears her tartan-like mini-skirt without underwear. But who knows? Perhaps that's how most Latin schoolgirls look...

As for her service, I'd say two of my three bookings with her were decent-enough and one less so, somewhat lacking the same enthusiasm and willingness to do what I wanted - she can be picky with positions. Can completely see why you assumed cum-twice in 45 min would be fine, but it's a rookie mistake not to always explicitly check when booking. Generally found her friendly enough, complete with dry, witty humour first time round, but our chat's always been very brief. She's sensual enough, but not as full-on as I like. Although I found her FK and tongue action decent-enough.

I've only ever done 15 min with her, so couldn't comment on any more. But on that basis, combined with her looks, my experiences with her have certainly been more positive than negative. Usually offers Anal (not sure if extra) and whatnot in longer bookings and perhaps ups her game all-round here. But from what I've seen, I doubt I'd ever be inclined to part with more than 50 for a quick fuck-and-go.

[DaVINCI]

I thought she was attractive, no problem's there but those pictures are definitely not her. She sometimes puts in real pictures of her in with those pictures, therefore l do not understand why continually use those fake pics!

SP should never use fake pics if it is not her, irrespective if they think they look like them. The girl in the fake pics, l would say, has a fuller figure and has a whiter complexion.

If she has a cum once policy she should be upfront on her profile. Cum twice is extra at £30, the cum once in 1 hour is a not right unless she specifies on her profile.

Positioning thighs so l couldn't gain full access is not the sort of service level I would expect from a good SP.

If you have not seen her for more than 15mins, how can you say she perhaps ups her game  because from my experience that was not the case.

[The Man With No Name]

I thought she was attractive, no problem's there but those pictures are definitely not her. She sometimes puts in real pictures of her in with those pictures, therefore l do not understand why continually use those fake pics!

SP should never use fake pics if it is not her, irrespective if they think they look like them. The girl in the fake pics, l would say, has a fuller figure and has a whiter complexion.

Agreed. But this has been long-established on here, together with the fact that the actual girl you get is very physically impressive. So you don't need to keep whining about it.

If she has a cum once policy she should be upfront on her profile. Cum twice is extra at £30, the cum once in 1 hour is a not right unless she specifies on her profile.

Again, you're repeating yourself. There's no section on the profile where she has to stipulate this - being ES.com, there's barely a profile to begin with. Nor is it even the case that she implies cum-twice is fine in longer bookings, but fails to state an extra charge. Given the state of the site and the number of utterly fake listings, you're lucky she had two arms and two legs. There's sadly no law either, decreeing a minimum of two ejaculations for every hour booked with a prossie of this land. As such, you can't claim she's misleading any punters here. You simply assumed and made an arse of yourself, as the old saying goes. This is your responsibility to check, sorry.

If you have not seen her for more than 15mins, how can you say she perhaps ups her game  because from my experience that was not the case.

You said it yourself: PERHAPS. Fucking hell...

[DaVINCI]

Agreed. But this has been long-established on here, together with the fact that the actual girl you get is very physically impressive. So you don't need to keep whining about it.

My review is to alert punters of my experience, you say the photos have been long established in here but not on a review and are misleading irrespective of your view. You also mention she was physically impressive but the profile FAKE photos are much more impressive, especially the face. Although you think she is impressive, maybe not everyone would agree with this  . Removing all FAKE pics and putting up real photos is the right thing and would be better for all concerned. Rather than telling me to stop whining about it.  Camilla should take note of this and act accordingly.

Again, you're repeating yourself. There's no section on the profile where she has to stipulate this - being ES.com, there's barely a profile to begin with. Nor is it even the case that she implies cum-twice is fine in longer bookings, but fails to state an extra charge.

There is also no section either on A/W where SP has to stipulate Extra fees but there is nothing to stop her putting this in the main part of her profile. If this is a big issue to her I would expect this along with all good SP to do, rather than notifying the punter after round 1. l have taken comments on board and will not fall for this scenario in future, it wasn't too big a issue as it was only £30 but to me Camilla should also be upfront about her additional fees.

Given the state of the site and the number of utterly fake listings, you're lucky she had two arms and two legs.

Maybe a reason why Camilla has put her listing in there  regarding your additional comment, I'll disregard that 

There's sadly no law either, decreeing a minimum of two ejaculations for every hour booked with a prossie of this land. As such, you can't claim she's misleading any punters here. You simply assumed and made an arse of yourself, as the old saying goes. This is your responsibility to check, sorry.

As previous, I have noted for future, but Camilla not indicating can be construed as misleading indirectly. She should be upfront about her cum-twice policy and any additional fees that see may have (Anal, CIM etc) and that way punters can see "out with tourer's" she is up there with the most expensive SP in Central Scotland. Charging premium rates for a sub standard service,

As for her service, I'd say two of my three bookings with her were decent-enough and one less so, somewhat lacking the same enthusiasm and willingness to do what I wanted - she can be picky with positions.

Stopping me gaining full access in missionary service  is poor service, irrespective of being picky with positions  .

Putting the additional fee issue aside, the Negative would have also been given for the following;

1. Fake Photos
2. Another SP in the flat which is illegal
3. Not allowing full access sex in standard missionary position.

 

[Clattypats]

Being a "one pop guy" I think I can be slightly objective here  ...Any booking I have, no matter duration,that's what it is...If though, I could "cum" twice in hh or one hour, I think I would mention it in comms, when arranging a booking to see where the land lies...

There is no option for it in a WGs LL...Some mention it in FAQs or somewhere in their profile..some don't. ...It's your money, your review, and your rating, as you see fit.
.

[The Man With No Name]

It's your money, your review, and your rating, as you see fit.

Well, of course. But he's just spent the last two days repeatedly, senselessly whining and nitpicking about every aspect of my experiences, aspects of his that he's ultimately to blame for, and stuff that simply doesn't matter.

But no, actually, he's right. This massive rant has proved he should just sue Camilla and Escort Scotland and deserves to win. He has a really good case after all. Hope he donates some of the payout to UK Punting so they can finally get all of Camilla's negative reviews indexed together.

Reminds me of someone, but without the humour and just the tragedy.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Clattypats]

Well, of course. But he's just spent the last two days repeatedly, senselessly whining and nitpicking about every aspect of my experiences, aspects of his that he's ultimately to blame for, and stuff that simply doesn't matter.

But no, actually, he's right. This massive rant has proved he should just sue Camilla and Escort Scotland and deserves to win. He has a really good case after all. Hope he donates some of the payout to UK Punting so they can finally get all of Camilla's negative reviews indexed together.

Reminds me of someone, but without the humour and just the tragedy.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Apologies  ...I skimmed by the last rant of his...Only read the first two posts...It was all becoming a tad excruciating...

[Flunt]

Well, of course. But he's just spent the last two days repeatedly, senselessly whining and nitpicking about every aspect of my experiences, aspects of his that he's ultimately to blame for, and stuff that simply doesn't matter.

But no, actually, he's right. This massive rant has proved he should just sue Camilla and Escort Scotland and deserves to win. He has a really good case after all. Hope he donates some of the payout to UK Punting so they can finally get all of Camilla's negative reviews indexed together.

Reminds me of someone, but without the humour and just the tragedy.

The question is: do you want punters to highlight a poor service with sneaky extras thrown in so they can make an informed choice or do you want fluffy fanboys turning up with their Brasso?

The only thing worse than White Knights are the soppy cunts who post on a negative, "Oh yeah, I saw her last week and she was shit!"

She sounds okay for a 15 minute pump and dump but one to avoid for anything longer. Maybe you should think about writing your own fluffy positive for others to consider instead of slating the OP?

[g3nius]

The question is: do you want punters to highlight a poor service with sneaky extras thrown in so they can make an informed choice or do you want fluffy fanboys turning up with their Brasso?

The only thing worse than White Knights are the soppy cunts who post on a negative, "Oh yeah, I saw her last week and she was shit!"

She sounds okay for a 15 minute pump and dump but one to avoid for anything longer. Maybe you should think about writing your own fluffy positive for others to consider instead of slating the OP?

+1

I’m just glad he’s sharing as much info and an opinion as possible. (Whether we agree with certain parts is one thing, but at least he’s saying something)

[The Man With No Name]

All true, of course.

Just don't see the point of another two lengthy posts, repeating exactly the same complaints of the first, whether you agree with them or not.

[Flunt]

All true, of course.

Just don't see the point of another two lengthy posts, repeating exactly the same complaints of the first, whether you agree with them or not.

For me it is a reaction to someone questioning my experiences, restating the issues for posting the negative seems like the only answer you can give and highlighting exactly what's in the review. From your reply you enjoyed a 15 minute quickie and received the services you paid for. The OP posted a thread and got some stick for not confirming prior to booking/paying and after posting the review he gets more stick.

Seems a bit harsh the other side of the wall, I'll keep my softness down south. 

[I1ofafew]

Hi Davinci
Did this take place on the 24th of June? If you don't mind me asking buddy

[Matrix]

Hi Davinci
Did this take place on the 24th of June? If you don't mind me asking buddy

Do you mind me asking you why you're asking him?

[Sinz]

Hi Davinci
Did this take place on the 24th of June? If you don't mind me asking buddy

Are you going to process the refund ?

[Sinz]

Do you mind me asking you why you're asking him?

He must be from the Retention team.

[Clattypats]

Hi Davinci
Did this take place on the 24th of June? If you don't mind me asking buddy

This is all a bit specific...Are you the WG in question?...

Alot of punters like to let time elapse between bookings and reviewing,for discretion purposes...So do you really think he is going to respond and give YOU an exact date...

[I1ofafew]

Sorry guys i thought it was a innocent question, maybe I should have explained, I had a booking that day but was cancelled at last minute as was told she had family emergency and wasn't going to be available that day...Plans ruined. Not been back to Glasgow since. She seemed like she would be worth a good punt was going rearrange for the next time I visit Glasgow but if she can't even be decent enough to tell the truth then what would you expect from not being up front with punters.thats the only reason for asking. But thanks anyway.

[Clattypats]

Sorry guys i thought it was a innocent question, maybe I should have explained, I had a booking that day but was cancelled at last minute as was told she had family emergency and wasn't going to be available that day...

What's this got to do with the question you asked the OP...Nowhere does he mention anything about a family emergency in his review...So you just picked a random date he may have seen her?...Doesn't make sense!...

[BigTonto]

Sorry guys i thought it was a innocent question, maybe I should have explained, I had a booking that day but was cancelled at last minute as was told she had family emergency and wasn't going to be available that day...Plans ruined. Not been back to Glasgow since. She seemed like she would be worth a good punt was going rearrange for the next time I visit Glasgow but if she can't even be decent enough to tell the truth then what would you expect from not being up front with punters.thats the only reason for asking. But thanks anyway.

What a warmer! ,

if it so happens it was the date in question, are you suggesting she had a eurica moment mid-mish and somehow predicted the family emergency as it happened, then took rest the day off?

[I1ofafew]

What's this got to do with the question you asked the OP...Nowhere does he mention anything about a family emergency in his review...So you just picked a random date he may have seen her?...Doesn't make sense!...

The review is dated the 24th of June ok, which happened to be the day I was supposed to have an appointment for. I just wanted to know if that was the same date his punt took place. Didn't think it was so difficult to understand, but starting to see why some of you guys need to Visit WG.

[BigTonto]

The review is dated the 24th of June ok, which happened to be the day I was supposed to have an appointment for. I just wanted to know if that was the same date his punt took place. Didn't think it was so difficult to understand, but starting to see why some of you guys need to pay for sex.

You've joined today to ask an op the date he met a prossie

Your enough to put us all off punting if this is the way you act to a negative review

Which 1 are you, Camilla or his bird ( buddy) 

[Matrix]

The review is dated the 24th of June ok, which happened to be the day I was supposed to have an appointment for. I just wanted to know if that was the same date his punt took place. Didn't think it was so difficult to understand, but starting to see why some of you guys need to Visit WG.

You ain't going to last long on here with that attitude, Bucko! 

[Clattypats]

The review is dated the 24th of June ok, which happened to be the day I was supposed to have an appointment for. I just wanted to know if that was the same date his punt took place. Didn't think it was so difficult to understand, but starting to see why some of you guys need to Visit WG.

I know it's dated the 24th of June you Numpty  ...Do you think every punter posts a review the same day as the booking...Most dont/won't...

The question you asked the OP is none of your Fucking business...Punters shouldn't be asking about what dates punts took place or may take place, where other punters are concerned...It's out of order!...

[Clattypats]

but starting to see why some of you guys need to Visit WG.

And what is this meant to mean?...You are starting to sound more like the WG or her BF/pimp, by the minute...

[BigTonto]

And what is this meant to mean?...You are starting to sound more like the WG or her BF/pimp, by the minute...

Just been brought to my attention as I re-read the OPs post.

Cannot remember who, but great tip learned the other day reading another OPs post
stating that most OPs who start with the saying " guys" usually is the prossie in question.

So you are correct clatty, as to 'starting to sound', she actually started by sounding.

More fool us 

[DaVINCI]

The question you asked the OP is none of your Fucking business...Punters shouldn't be asking about what dates punts took place or may take place, where other punters are concerned...It's out of order!

Its it true though, shouldn't be asking me that question, I thought it was a strange request