Author Topic: Kelly May - Royal Oak  (Read 1718 times)


14 review(s) for Kelly_May (13 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline OutForJustice80

Who: External Link/Members Only

Comms: excellent via Uke and text

Where: her flat near Royal Oak (eight to ten minutes walk from tube)

How much: £170

Services: dfk, owo, dt, facefucking, bondage, face slapping, spitting, fingering, ro, anal play, rimming, cim, throatpie

Would I go back: probably but I’d try and catch her when she’s doing a hotel incall day.

The girl: as in photos though a shade bigger in practice than I was expecting. Facially... I dunno. Not blown away but not turned off either. Girl next door I guess. Hard to quantify as taste is individual but if you book for beauty I guess this may not be the one for you. Was surprised by how young she looks. Partly down to her manner on Uke and also just always expecting WGs to lie about their age I guess. She’s young. Early 20s for sure. I don’t know why but I found it a little disconcerting but that’s my issue. Good personality and attitude.

Positives: great service, great attitude, pleasant conversation.

Neutral: place was fucking hot and the flat is a bit shoddy. I think she mainly operates outcalls and I’ve punted in a fair few places and I wouldn’t say I’m overly squeamish. This place wasn’t grubby or anything, just a bit weird and the furniture is all a bit shonky. Sofa felt like I was going to fall through it.

Negatives: not quite my type physically

Short version: great service, average aesthetics. Overall positive.

TLDR: I’ve been looking forward to meeting Kelly for some time as she was recommended to me a while back by another member with similar tastes. She comes across really well in comms and in person but tbh I knew this punt was never going to be a complete winner as soon as the door opened. I like a lot of different shapes of women but Kelly falls somewhere between my sexual sofa cushions and her body shape isn’t big or small enough to really turn me on. If her tits were a bit bigger and her arse a bit fuller or she’d been slightly slimmer in the tum and thighs I think we’d have been well in business but as it is she didn’t really do it for me. Her face is a bit plain but I didn’t necessarily mind that and she has a glint, particularly with a mouthful of dick which I found quite appealing. Service wise I can’t fault her at all and the first round of the punt was pretty awesome. With her on her knees, arms bound and totally submissive taking a facefucking like a champ before I came in her throat.

Round two was a more tepid affair. Like a football match where one side is up 4-0 at halftime and no more goals are scored. I largely put this down to the humidity. I went down on her for a while then we tried anal but I wasn’t at full mast so we went back to oral which I was enjoying and ended up cumming under my own steam while she licked my balls and rimmed me. Not a bad way to finish so maybe there was actually a token breakaway goal scored by a sub returning from a long term injury to make it 5-0 final score.


SaneOnes

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is pretty much how I envisioned a booking would turn out to be if I'd ever booked her after not feeling it at all from her UKE pics. It's usually the not so attractive ones that turn out to be great in bed with a lovely personality. So, thanks for the review. But I'm still not sure about labelling a girl "girl next door" as soon as her less than flattering looks are unveiled :D A lot of attractive girls live next door to somebody. Anyway, this one's out of shape body is enough to put me off. Thanks again.

Offline OutForJustice80

This is pretty much how I envisioned a booking would turn out to be if I'd ever booked her after not feeling it at all from her UKE pics. It's usually the not so attractive ones that turn out to be great in bed with a lovely personality. So, thanks for the review. But I'm still not sure about labelling a girl "girl next door" as soon as her less than flattering looks are unveiled :D A lot of attractive girls live next door to somebody. Anyway, this one's out of shape body is enough to put me off. Thanks again.
Girl next door isn’t a literal term though. It’s meant to mean kind of ordinary looking. Not remarkably attractive or unattractive. I guess it means different things to different people.

SaneOnes

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I get what it's meant to mean in the world of men who also say things like "model looks" when different people have different idea of what a "model" should look like. None of these terms are meant to be literal but on paper they also look vaguely dismissive. Anyway, I'm not trying to argue with you but I see too many reviewers use that term with a very specific (towie/goerdie shore) idea of beauty.

Offline OutForJustice80