Amy Amazon (Colindale)

[Wozel]

Date 21/2/18

Venue :10 minute walk from Colindale tube.parking nearby, not free between 2-3 pm ,good sized bedroom with a mirror ( for those who like to see the action)

Coms :via phone, had some trouble getting through as the line wouldn’t connect.

The WG :mature female with an absolute amazing body for her age.

The action: Amy greeted me with a kiss and offered shower which I accepted. Amy has a amazing ass, boobs are big but fake. I place the chair infront of the mirror and just by looking at that amazing ass I was hard in seconds. OWO was delivered with some DT and has a good technique, didn’t suck balls but then again I didn’t ask her too. Sex in mish, CG, doggie and probone. Two pops and her massage is wicked, deep tissue, ( better than some others I’ve seen).

Positives : Amazing body but face wasn’t my cup of tea.
                Bedroom is nice and clean.
                £80 for the hour and Anal is only an extra £20.

Negatives: No free parking directly outside the block, but there is pay and display.
                 
Will I return: I have already, twice




Hidden Image/Members Only

[pepsicolaboy]

Welcome to the forum and thanks for your review 

I want to see her but her aw profile says shes finishes to early in the day for me, bearing in mind her location 

[man0208]

I seen Amy I find it very business minded and felt not natural services. The ass like that feel like good pounding long strokes. But she dosent let you do long stroke or to pound. And she gets irritated. I wouldent class as positive but nutral. The all time best is sexycaroline1 is similar combination of GFE AND PSE she only sees selected regulars.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Wozel]

Welcome to the forum and thanks for your review 

I want to see her but her aw profile says shes finishes to early in the day for me, bearing in mind her location 

Thanks, your right her working times are an issue, no chance of a late night punt.

[pepsicolaboy]

I seen Amy I find it very business minded and felt not natural services. The ass like that feel like good pounding long strokes. But she dosent let you do long stroke or to pound. And she gets irritated. I wouldent class as positive but nutral. The all time best is sexycaroline1 is similar combination of GFE AND PSE she only sees selected regulars.

Hidden Image/Members Only

No offence but 90% of your reviews are negative and the other neutral - which means your very picky or one unlucky b_astard.

You havent reviewed either Amy Amazin or  sexycaroline1  as far as I can see?

Could you do some reviews of those 2 so other gents can mull over your opinions

 

[pepsicolaboy]

Thanks, your right her working times are an issue, no chance of a late night punt.

Im keeping my eye on her profile in case things changes or I get a day off 

Profile suggests she works EVERY day  but my weekends are fairly busy these days, we'll see.

Glad you had a good punt, really intrigued by her and want to see that body 

[mrhappypants]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[smiths]

No offence but 90% of your reviews are negative and the other neutral - which means your very picky or one unlucky b_astard.

You havent reviewed either Amy Amazin or  sexycaroline1  as far as I can see?

Could you do some reviews of those 2 so other gents can mull over your opinions

 

It doesn't necessarily mean he is very picky or unlucky as he may only review his neutral and negative punts, I find reviews on here aren't a good indicator of the punts a punter has done in the same period as the reviews, unless they state so. I agree about posting about seeing WGs but not reviewing them but obviously that's up to him.

This WG offered me a good service but the more reviews on a WG the better.

[davidgood]

This was my review from a few years when she was Amy Black.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=53799.0

I seem to think that at that time she had 2 profiles with different names.

I am pleased to hear she is still offering a reasonable service.

Regards,

davidgood

[pepsicolaboy]

It doesn't necessarily mean he is very picky or unlucky as he may only review his neutral and negative punts, I find reviews on here aren't a good indicator of the punts a punter has done in the same period as the reviews, unless they state so. I agree about posting about seeing WGs but not reviewing them but obviously that's up to him.

This WG offered me a good service but the more reviews on a WG the better.

Good point. That does mirror human behaviour, many only motivated to leave reviews (non Punting related) when the service has been poor. However I hope he takes your point that posting good reviews is also really beneficial for other gents as well.

 

[tantraman]

I seem to think that at that time she had 2 profiles with different names.

'Tis true, sir ...

Former AW profiles (for indexing):
External Link/Members Only and External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only and External Link/Members Only

[smiths]

Good point. That does mirror human behaviour, many only motivated to leave reviews (non Punting related) when the service has been poor. However I hope he takes your point that posting good reviews is also really beneficial for other gents as well.

 

As I see it its even more important to do neutral and negative reviews to warn other punters which for whatever reason that poster hasn't done. Amy had a very good attitude and never got irritated the times I have punted with her so my experiences don't reflect his, but that's not unusual, as we know a WG can offer a good service to one punter, and an ok or bad one to others.

But yes ALL reviews as long as genuine are useful.

[mrhappypants]

I agree with Smiths, a individual’s review record does not necessarily reflect their punting behaviour. 

I only review about 20% of punts because the others are either inconclusive -  to little experience to write up, or are repeat visits.  If I am on-the-record there is limited value to add by further comment.  I enjoy 75% of bookings but you’d never guess from my review record.

This said, I am frankly suspicious of anyone who has a very high positive review rate.  Some review records on here look like utter bullshit.   I have started calling this out, either; giving positives which don’t stand up to scrutiny (“fake pictures, withheld services, 10 years older than advertised but she called me donkey dick”), really low standards (“I managed to come even though the room smelt of piss”) or just touting...

[dubhcarr]

agree with both Mr Smiths and Mr Happypants comments.....it is the YMMV factor plus I think if the reviews are a true unbiased reflection of the meet it reflects the degree of risk a punter takes with his hard earned......I have almost stopped booking Romanians but there are a few to see with consistent reviews and I prefer to meet girls with reviews from credible punters......I am prepared on occasion to TOFTT cos these meet reviews are appreciated by me (from other punters) and helps us all but the degree of risk of failure is high with these meets.....

appreciate the review OP this is one SP I have yet to visit......

[Mr Sinister]

I seen Amy I find it very business minded and felt not natural services. The ass like that feel like good pounding long strokes. But she dosent let you do long stroke or to pound. And she gets irritated. I wouldent class as positive but nutral. The all time best is sexycaroline1 is similar combination of GFE AND PSE she only sees selected regulars.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Guy has a good point, come across wgs like this so good to know if it is worth seeing her or not. Always annoying when a WG has a certain body trait but doesn't like to do this or touch that.

[Wozel]

My second review on her.

Again it’s difficult to get hold of her if you call her number, however I got a text back fairly quickly. Arranged the the meet. Asked if she could do secretary outfit with glasses and the response back was “I’ll try my best”. She didn’t.

Parked in Eagle Drive, restrictions from 1400-1500 but I went for a 1900 meeting so was good. It’s about a less than 5 mins walk.

Got a shower and the bathroom is spotless plus good water pressure.

Started with some FK with her ass showing from the mirror, that in itself gave the captain to stand to attention. OWO was excellent and just looking at her ass in the mirror was just simply breathtaking. Sucked on her fake tits and then some RO. Miss and cum in condom.

Then with some excellent massage and round 2. I simply just couldn’t finish as I had just finished work and was very tired.

Some chitchat and then good bye.

Looking forward to meeting her again as I think I will make her one of my regulars.

Tomorrow I’m going to meet Aliceinxwonderland. Will report back soon.

[smiths]

My second review on her.

Again it’s difficult to get hold of her if you call her number, however I got a text back fairly quickly. Arranged the the meet. Asked if she could do secretary outfit with glasses and the response back was “I’ll try my best”. She didn’t.

Parked in Eagle Drive, restrictions from 1400-1500 but I went for a 1900 meeting so was good. It’s about a less than 5 mins walk.

Got a shower and the bathroom is spotless plus good water pressure.

Started with some FK with her ass showing from the mirror, that in itself gave the captain to stand to attention. OWO was excellent and just looking at her ass in the mirror was just simply breathtaking. Sucked on her fake tits and then some RO. Miss and cum in condom.

Then with some excellent massage and round 2. I simply just couldn’t finish as I had just finished work and was very tired.

Some chitchat and then good bye.

Looking forward to meeting her again as I think I will make her one of my regulars.

Tomorrow I’m going to meet Aliceinxwonderland. Will report back soon.

This review breaks UKP rules, you cant do more than 1 positive review on the same WG in a 12 month period, you reviewed her in February this year positively, you can only do another review if the rating changed from positive to neutral or negative as examples. What you should of done is added this post to your Feb review thread.

[smiths]

Thanks to admin for moving the OPs intended second positive review in under 12 months which breaks UKP rules on Amy and merging it into his review here from February.