Author Topic: Yumikochan on AdultWork - E14  (Read 3225 times)

Offline Oldblighter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 59
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
After some really good experiences with massages (see below for more positive ratings), I thought I'd try Yumikochan (External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only). I liked the look of her, and her comments that she was "much reviewed elite high class sexy independent Cute sweet stunning gorgerous [sic]" and on and on sounded good - reviews were excellent: 10 field reviews and 159 positive ratings, so what could go wrong?

Plenty, as it turned out: this was a horrorshow. The girl was the same as in the photos, but these were some years old and she'd put on some weight since then. I didn't mind that, as she was still pretty fit, but everything else was terrible. A cold reception, no shower but just told to undress and lay on the bed. There followed a cursory massage with no erotic tinges (no CC swipes or anything like); was then told to turn over, whereupon she gave what I can only describe as a hard wank - so poor that I had to take over myself. It was all over in 20 minutes an I was glad to escape. No sign of the promised full body massage that I paid £120 for - in fact she just took her top off.

I won't waste any more time on this, will just leave one word of advice AVOID LIKE THE PLAGUE. Well, that's four words, but she deserves them. A stinker.

Much better experiences are available elsewhere, and I'd particularly recommend Haru (External Link/Members Only) and Pretty99999 (External Link/Members Only) for really superb erotic experiences.
Banned reason: Abusive troll
Banned by:

Offline Hackneylad1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,055
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 31
159 reviews but majority are from punters with 0 feedback. Totally fake!

Offline Oldblighter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 59
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
159 reviews but majority are from punters with 0 feedback. Totally fake!

Good point: I hadn't noticed that.
Banned reason: Abusive troll
Banned by:

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Quote
10 field reviews and 159 positive ratings, so what could go wrong?

All of that were on AW - hence everything could go wrong.

The WG had 2 Negatives on UKP and no Positives, that is more than enough to avoid her.

Nevertheless, thanks for sharing your experience.

Bette luck next time.

power2u

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
saw this girl recently and it was a ok punt. most off putting was the fact that she is clearly a lot older than her pics and this was a huge turn off.

I should have listened to my inner voice when I enquired about the booking. it was too easy to get a quick appointment and no discussions on what I wanted out of the session.

here is my review

looks: 4/10
much older than her pics. inbetween milf and grandmother age. might work for some of you but not me.

body: 7/10
good size breast and decently slim. very smooth skin and in all honesty her body is a huge contrast to her looks. her body feels like someone in their mid 20s. she loses a point on her hairy pubes which I'm not a fan. (no shaving or tidying)

service: 6/10
owo was extra so I opted out (the cheek) had sex in various different positions which was good. I was pissed off that she wasn't a stunner so my thoughts were I'm going to make the most of this and gave as much as one can give and held back cumming for as long as possible. she seemed to enjoy it as she thank me straight after I unloaded in doggy style.

overall was a ok punt but will not return.

Offline Romney

Totally fake AW feedback.  Her usual tactic is to add about 10 feedbacks all at once every six months or so, as was said, normally all fake, from people with 0 fb themselves. 

Sorry you had a bad experience, but thanks for sharing as she is definitely one to avoid..

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
saw this girl recently and it was a ok punt. most off putting was the fact that she is clearly a lot older than her pics and this was a huge turn off.

I should have listened to my inner voice when I enquired about the booking. it was too easy to get a quick appointment and no discussions on what I wanted out of the session.

here is my review

looks: 4/10
much older than her pics. inbetween milf and grandmother age. might work for some of you but not me.

body: 7/10
good size breast and decently slim. very smooth skin and in all honesty her body is a huge contrast to her looks. her body feels like someone in their mid 20s. she loses a point on her hairy pubes which I'm not a fan. (no shaving or tidying)

service: 6/10
owo was extra so I opted out (the cheek) had sex in various different positions which was good. I was pissed off that she wasn't a stunner so my thoughts were I'm going to make the most of this and gave as much as one can give and held back cumming for as long as possible. she seemed to enjoy it as she thank me straight after I unloaded in doggy style.

overall was a ok punt but will not return.

Best to drop the above as a separate review, rather than a comment

bristolqwerty

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Shocking! I did see a VP sometime ago that looked like my gran + 10years.  Her fanny must resemble an omelette dropped on the floor but still folded.  :vomit: Does AW care about her/her pumps Bullshit antics? 

Offline bartholomew

Well, had her on my 'Hot List' for ages, (luckily) missed her last time she was in Guildford, but was going to book as she's in Crawley area for a month.
Now I've read this thread I can save my time and money.
Thanks guys!

Offline Oldblighter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 59
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
I'd totally forgotten that I'd seen Yumikochan and found the experience terrible; I was thinking of booking her, but instead went to see Nikkichan, who is wonderful. I won't add a review as there are eight on here already, all positive and rightly so, Nikki is an absolute treasure!
Banned reason: Abusive troll
Banned by:

Offline Agent W

Just for the record and in case it helps anyone else, she is also on Acemassage as External Link/Members Only. It’s a promising profile but the reviews here are all dire. Thanks for the warning.