I would never have a punt just based on reviews, but Sophie had been on my 'B' list for months, and some recent reviews of her made me think I'd better get my finger out and either delete her photo from my file or give her a go.
External Link/Members OnlyWith massage parlour girls there are no issues regarding communication, location, premises, parking, price, and so on, because we know all that already. The only things that can disappoint are if the girl's attitude isn't right or if you just don't fancy her. There was nothing wrong with Sophie's attitude at all; she was friendly enough, and quite chatty, although her voice has a smokers rasp which made her sound a bit rough. But I didn't fancy her one bit.
I don't think I'm especially fussy. So long as everything is reasonably well proportioned, then from slim and petite to robust and voluptuous, bring 'em on. But there's a fine line between voluptuous and fat, and from slim to thin. I expected her to be slim, from her profile photos, but she was over the line and way, way too thin for me.
Her recent reviewers all thought her body was nigh-on perfect. Whether a glass is considered to be half-full or half-empty, it still has the same amount of liquid in it. They were very much half-full; 'slim, toned, with pert, natural breasts, slender, shapely legs and a neat, firm little arse'. I was half-empty; 'thin, flat-chested, spindly legged and with a meagre arse hopelessly unsuitable for spanking'. I've long stopped being too prissy about tattoos, but I could have done without the bit of body piercing, too.
So there we are. It's a good job we don't all fancy the same kind of women, or they'd be very rarely available and very, very expensive. I went through with the punt, of course - I'd already given the receptionist the sixty quid, for a start, which is how they do it there. Sophie offers all sorts of bells and whistles in with the set price, including OWO and RO, but I just went with the bare essentials. The sex was fine. After a nice massage, she made some nice eye-contact during her oral work - with, not without - and then a good session of full-throttle 'heels to heaven' missionary was rounded off doggie-style to bring things to a perfectly satisfactory conclusion.
Not that it really matters, because it's only a review, but a 'negative' rating is probably a bit unfair on her. It's not her fault I didn't fancy her, and there's nothing misleading about her profile, and I can see how Sophie appeals to a lot of guys. She just didn't appeal to me, that's all, hence the disappointing punt. But you can't win 'em all, and I'll still be full of optimism for the next.