Author Topic: _Submissive Lauren_ - Angel  (Read 2043 times)


41 review(s) for _Submissive Lauren_ (35 positive, 2 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Kev40ish]

Offline Complete Novice

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

TL/DR: 
Looks:  I suppose quite pretty but doesn't come close to troubling the stunner category for my money;
Attitude:  A bit lifeless, gave very little feedback during the action and lacked a proactive work ethic; and
Skills: Ok, perhaps a bit mechanical, basically nothing standout.

Booking length: 1.5 hours
Cost: £270 (£240 + £30 for a-levels).
Comms: Good. Easy and straightforward, all arranged by text.

Location:
Fit for purpose.  Clean and tidy ground floor apartment; approximately 5 minutes-walk from Angel underground station (Northern line);  whilst the bathroom's seen better days (not en-suite) it was functional; a clean towel and toiletries were provided; bottle of water offered.

She has a flatmate, I've no idea who, but it's another WG by Lauren's own admission so I'm guessing it's whoever she duos with.

The Escort:
Polish; mid 20's; 5'3"; size 6; petite build; pretty good skin and teeth; dyed long blonde hair, tied into a pony tail; fairly firm physique but not gym toned; cesarean section scar which wasn't too pronounced; augmented breasts; multiple tattoos; wearing matching black underwear and black hold up stockings; completely shaven.

To talk to, I found Lauren pleasant and easy going and her English is good.  On the day and from what I could tell, I believed her to be non-smoker; but if memory serves me correctly, I think her profile says she's a 'social' smoker.

On opening the door my immediate reaction was one of being underwhelmed.  The picture of her in the black PVC catsuit currently in her free AW gallery is for me, the most indicative of the woman you're hiring (this has been added to her gallery post this booking).  I thought her other AW profile shots were perhaps a little 'generous', in as far as whilst I doubt they've been photoshopped, there's been clever use of lighting, angles etc.

With the benefit of hindsight, I probably should have asked her to let her hair down as she was sporting a bit of a Croydon face lift.

Services agreed and rec'd:  FK, OWO, RO, FF, protected sex with a-levels and CIM.

The meet:
I'll keep this brief but the lack of any real pro-activeness and feedback killed this booking for me.  Even though Lauren's submissive, I found her too passive for my tastes.  I was unable to coax much life out of her in this booking which was probably down to me, as when the action stopped she was quite chatty and friendly:

•         Very light FK;
•         Slightly responsive to my appalling attempts at RO;
•         OWO lacked 'traction', plenty of DT though and little use of her hands.  Some attention to my nuts, none to my perineum, she takes a FF reasonably well;
•         Mish, spoons, CG, reverse CG, anal in doggy and finally CIM.
•         All a bit middle of the road, nothing standout and I left slightly early.

Would I return: No.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2018, 10:07:40 am by Complete Novice »

Offline claretandblue

thanks for the review op,all sounds a bit underwhelming,shame as she was a good punt a few years back

punther

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
thanks for the review op,all sounds a bit underwhelming,shame as she was a good punt a few years back

how would you rate her DT?

Offline claretandblue

 :angry:
how would you rate her DT?

when I saw her as Tamara Tease it was strong, 7.5/8 out of 10 job  :hi:

Offline Cumberland

Location not easy for me to get to, but think I may still give her a try. Thinking FF-ing her may be easier if she just lies there and let’s you dominate her like a lifeless fuck-doll. Am I expecting too much if I’m looking for a proper throat-fuck?

Offline Snowenne

She denied me Anal since my d is too thick she said yet still she was able to take it all 16-17cm in her mouth pretty good ff too i must say my booking was for 2 hrs also 8.5/10 overall.