A neutral from me would be a drop in the ocean! Also explaining the circumstances would compromise my AW ID.
Well, if everybody is going around saying there's a nice big jug of fresh water about, but you're saying there's a little drop of poison in it, I and I suspect many others would want to know you know about that. If there's 50 positive reviews for a prossie and one neutral or negative, I'm reading the neutral or negative first.
Having given a negative to a very popular prossie on here, I was hounded by her fanclub and my AW ID was compromised... Not something I enjoyed, but at the end of the day I'm fine, and I feel it had certain cathartic benefits to me, and I do think it probably helped other punters interested in seeing her in knowing what to expect.
Surely it could be done in a way that doesn't compromise your AW ID though? I can understand why you wouldn't want to risk it though.
Maybe he is scared of the fan club.
does seem like deja vu with all the threads
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=58644.msg754285#msg754285
what a hive of forum villans banned from that thread
Well, exactly. Maybe there's a good way to give them cause to quiet down a bit..
I remember not so long ago everybody on here thought the sun shinned out of louise2604's ass. One negative and suddenly the perspective on her was very much changed. Certainly for me it was anyway.
But as we both know, reviews are not compulsory, so it's up to him at the end. If he doesn't want to post a review and has his reasons I do respect that.
Would be funny to see some knightly types get wound up though.
