I dunno James, seems like she's mainly a web cammer. On her "escort companionship" she says;
"Please note I don't offer any nudity in my services!"
Her likes do not include anything penetrative actions either. Seems like a dud to me...
Appears to be the case - it seems the prices are merely to 'hang out' on closer inspection. Based on the 'movies' she probably does 'put out' for the right price, but won't be exploring this one - too much effort.
Unless her verification picture shows some ID with her date of birth, you're never going to be able to verify if she really is 18.
I wouldn't hold out much hope of getting a WG who really is 18, or getting a decent punt from one who claims to be 18.
You're probably right to be honest....
Came across this one, who claims to have I.D -
External Link/Members Only - the price seems to a bit mad, considering she's a 6/10 at the very most. Sent an enquiry out of curiosity, asking for potential availability - showed up as 'read' within minutes, but no response given. Logs in everyday, but has no feedback and somehow doubt she's a serious WG.
Then you have this 'Cute Nicole' sort -
External Link/Members Only who judging by her AW feedback seems to be an inconsistent fuss pot, forcing clients to take a shower if she think's they don't 'look' clean enough, altering services and procedures based on the client's appearance, giving 'silence' and 'repulsed' expressions if she doesn't approve and won't give out any sort of number to communicate - seems like a pain in the ass.
With slim pickings for this on AW, already losing enthusiasm for the idea....
