Adultwork field report anomaly

[goldwing1]

If you leave a field report and the provider decides not to publish it, it still appears when you do a field report search.
Handy to know, because they won`t publish rubbish one`s.
Mind you, most people on here don`t trust Adultwork feedback or reports so I suppose it doesn`t matter

[NigelF]

If you leave a field report and the provider decides not to publish it, it still appears when you do a field report search.
Handy to know, because they won`t publish rubbish one`s.
Mind you, most people on here don`t trust Adultwork feedback or reports so I suppose it doesn`t matter

That is a good point actually, I should do a search as part of my research but I wouldn't imagine there are many negative FR's out there. Having said that, it is a good way to leave negative feedback without the risk of receiving some back (as you can write an FR, I believe, any time after the meet, including well over a month after and beyond).   

[bigthickdick]

Having said that, it is a good way to leave negative feedback without the risk of receiving some back (as you can write an FR, I believe, any time after the meet, including well over a month after and beyond).   

I
Only problem with that is that if at that point you haven't left a feedback yet you will have to do it at the time of writing your FR as your FR's rating will be taken from the feedback. So if you're leaving a positive feedback first being afraid of a retaliation negative and then wait for your positive feedback before leaving a honest FR then regardless of how negative the actual content of the FR is it will be marked as positive and someone will have to actually read it to know the truth.

[NigelF]

I
Only problem with that is that if at that point you haven't left a feedback yet you will have to do it at the time of writing your FR as your FR's rating will be taken from the feedback. So if you're leaving a positive feedback first being afraid of a retaliation negative and then wait for your positive feedback before leaving a honest FR then regardless of how negative the actual content of the FR is it will be marked as positive and someone will have to actually read it to know the truth.

I don't actually think that's the case. I think you only have to leave feedback if it's within the one calendar month deadline for leaving feedback (which I believe does actually allow you leave negative feedback with virtually no chance of retaliation if you do it right on the deadline - I should probably do a separate topic about that).

When I try to create an FR for bookings that are over a month ago - there is no option to leave feedback, only the field report itself (although admittedly, I haven't tested it by submitting one but it seems I still can).

Please correct me if I'm wrong though.

[goldwing1]

I don't actually think that's the case. I think you only have to leave feedback if it's within the one calendar month deadline for leaving feedback (which I believe does actually allow you leave negative feedback with virtually no chance of retaliation if you do it right on the deadline - I should probably do a separate topic about that).

When I try to create an FR for bookings that are over a month ago - there is no option to leave feedback, only the field report itself (although admittedly, I haven't tested it by submitting one but it seems I still can).

Please correct me if I'm wrong though.

[goldwing1]

I had a punt in May this year, I left her just the normal feedback,,,, but the option is still there to leave a field report if I want

[cueball]

I've never written a field report on aw and I've no intention to start now.

They mean nothing to me, my thinking is they're written to blow smoke up the lasses arse. They're not punter based, they're not to share or advise other punters. Needing the prossie sanction to display just says how corrupt the system is.

I do my field reports in review form on here, there's no smoke, no prossie control and no corruption.

You like doing your aw field reports goldwing.... they do you no favours on here.

[goldwing1]

I've never written a field report on aw and I've no intention to start now.

They mean nothing to me, my thinking is they're written to blow smoke up the lasses arse. They're not punter based, they're not to share or advise other punters. Needing the prossie sanction to display just says how corrupt the system is.

I do my field reports in review form on here, there's no smoke, no prossie control and no corruption.

You like doing your aw field reports goldwing.... they do you no favours on here.

If you saw that a WG had loads of negative feedback on Adultwork, I take it that you would just ignore it in the same way you ignore positive feedback.

Even feedback / reports on here can be hit and miss

[cueball]

If you saw that a WG had loads of negative feedback on Adultwork, I take it that you would just ignore it in the same way you ignore positive feedback.

Even feedback / reports on here can be hit and miss

Get your facts right... I didn't say feedback, I said field reports.... always better when firing a loaded gun to not point it in your ear 

[bigthickdick]

I don't actually think that's the case. I think you only have to leave feedback if it's within the one calendar month deadline for leaving feedback (which I believe does actually allow you leave negative feedback with virtually no chance of retaliation if you do it right on the deadline - I should probably do a separate topic about that).

When I try to create an FR for bookings that are over a month ago - there is no option to leave feedback, only the field report itself (although admittedly, I haven't tested it by submitting one but it seems I still can).

Please correct me if I'm wrong though.

I didn't know that you only have 1 month to leave a feedback. You must be right Nigel.

[goldwing1]

Get your facts right... I didn't say feedback, I said field reports.... always better when firing a loaded gun to not point it in your ear 

Feedback or field reports, would you ignore the negatives in the same way you ignore the positives?

[cueball]

Feedback or field reports, would you ignore the negatives in the same way you ignore the positives?

I don't read field reports because they're prossie sanctioned

I read feedbacks because they aren't prossie sanctioned, positive feedback has irrelevant wording, negative is much more interesting.

Is that clear enough 

[bigthickdick]

I don't read field reports because they're prossie sanctioned

I read feedbacks because they aren't prossie sanctioned, positive feedback has irrelevant wording, negative is much more interesting.

Is that clear enough 

Not 100% correct. A prossie can decide not to publish a FR on her aw profile. However she can't make it invisible, if you select 'search' and from the drop down menu 'view field reports' on the next page select 'search field reports' tab and on next page in the member nickname field you put in a WGs nickname and press search then ALL of her FRs will be displayed including the ones she's not displaying.

[cueball]

Not 100% correct. A prossie can decide not to publish a FR on her aw profile. However she can't make it invisible, if you select 'search' and from the drop down menu 'view field reports' on the next page select 'search field reports' tab and on next page in the member nickname field you put in a WGs nickname and press search then ALL of her FRs will be displayed including the ones she's not displaying.

Good to know thicky, in fact I think I've read that before.

The ones displayed on the profiles have had the prossie sanction, I'm right on that one I think.

[bigthickdick]

Good to know thicky, in fact I think I've read that before.

The ones displayed on the profiles have had the prossie sanction, I'm right on that one I think.

Basically yes. As far as i know when someone leaves a FR it goes through aw moderation (they make sure that no phone number, other sites etc are mentioned) and if it passes the SP gets notified by aw that a new field report has been left for them. They then have to display it on their profile and of course nobody would display a negative field report so in that sence you are correct. However some SPs don't know how to display it so it isn't necessarily that they are hiding anything...

I believe this info is correct however I can't be 100% sure so if any SP can confirm me or correct me please do it.

[NigelF]

Basically yes. As far as i know when someone leaves a FR it goes through aw moderation (they make sure that no phone number, other sites etc are mentioned) and if it passes the SP gets notified by aw that a new field report has been left for them. They then have to display it on their profile and of course nobody would display a negative field report so in that sence you are correct. However some SPs don't know how to display it so it isn't necessarily that they are hiding anything...

I believe this info is correct however I can't be 100% sure so if any SP can confirm me or correct me please do it.

I'm pretty sure that's all correct (based on the one time I have left an FR).