SexyBabeJess - Stockport/Whitefield

[sirbifford]

SexyBabeJess - Stockport/Whitefield
Links: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Proposed meet length/cost 2 hours - £190

Communications
All comms with Jess (Or Linzi according to some of her pictures!) were done via text, I did send a AW message which has gone unanswered. Comms by text were okay, My nan replies quicker though.

Venue/Appearance
I was given the postcode and she lives on the same road (Same postcode!) an old girlfriend so having previous experience of the area tells me the venue was going to be a shit hole. I cannot comment on the actual venue as I never got to the door, nor could I comment on the actual appearance of Jess/Linzi as I never got to see her in the flesh.

Summary
SexyBabeJess said she was going to be in Whitefield today, She changed to Stockport and didn't answer my texts or calls when I got to the area for the agreed time. I checked on here now and saw a negative review, Mini me did the thinking when I booked her as he stood to attention when he saw those amazing tits in the pictures.

I'm kicking myself that I read a review on here and thought I'll still go take a chance, Based on what I've read (again!) I'm £190 richer (2 hour meet) and I learnt that you will be messed around by escorts especially ones who think their something. This was going to be my first punt but thats gone wrong. This is my first review I hope this hasn't gone wrong!

Biff

[freeze44]

Cheers for this and what a waste of time for ya! As you say at least saved some cash and so will others by you putting this up and she will lose business for messing you around 

[NigelF]

Cheers for the review (it's always good to know if a girl is unreliable).

You should stick to well reviewed girls and you should definitely reduce the amount of time you plan to stay. For a first punt I'd recommend an hour max, that should be enough to not feel rushed but also not spend too much money on someone you might not like.

[OakTree]

Agree with Nigel. Two hours for a girl you've never seen before isn't a good idea. An hour max would be the norm. If you decide to go back? Then sure book longer if that's what you want.

Thanks for the review. She's someone now I won't be bothering with.

[sirbifford]

Thanks guys. The reason I wanted 2 hours was purely I didn't want to rush, but now will only book an hour.

Just still wound up that she would mess me around like that. Why would they do that? Has anyone found the answer.

Biff

[Infantryman 2]

I always book half hour for a first meet then a hour if I like her.

[goldwing1]

Suppose it`s the luck of the draw.
I`ve met her twice, incall with her partner at their house in Whitefield and second with her sister outcall to my house.
Had a fantastic time on both occasions and no problems.
Think she switches between working in Whitefield and Stockport because that`s where her sister lives

[cueball]

Welcome aboard op.

And thanks for taking the effort to share and review... it's appreciated 

Keep em coming

[Blue Moon]

Suppose it`s the luck of the draw.
I`ve met her twice, incall with her partner at their house in Whitefield and second with her sister outcall to my house.
Had a fantastic time on both occasions and no problems.
Think she switches between working in Whitefield and Stockport because that`s where her sister lives

Any chance of some reviews Goldwing? I've had my eye on this one but have decided against it because of recent reviews. Maybe your good experiences could counter-balance?    Bm

[cueball]

Any chance of some reviews Goldwing?

You'll be lucky bm... he properly spat his dummy out not long ago over his first failed attempt at a review.

[Blue Moon]

You'll be lucky bm... he properly spat his dummy out not long ago over his first failed attempt at a review.

Oh well, that reduces the credibility of his posts somewhat. Wonder why he keeps adding comments but won't do a review....?    Bm

[cueball]

Wonder why he keeps adding comments but won't do a review....?    Bm

He took his ball home, I think he's still mad at us 

[NigelF]

Suppose it`s the luck of the draw.

Rubbish. I don't make an appointment with my doctor and then get turned away with them saying "you've lost the draw for today, try again later". A booking is a booking (unless cancelled). Basically, I'm saying it's fine to say you've had no issues with comms and arranging things but it's not fine to excuse her shit organisation for this punter as "luck of the draw".

The rest of your comments are very useful input though. Put them in the form of review with a little more detail about her looks and services and you'll be golden (pun intended).

[goldwing1]

You'll be lucky bm... he properly spat his dummy out not long ago over his first failed attempt at a review.

Didn`t spit my dummy out, it was my first review, not been on this site long and was a bit unsure how it all worked, and all I got was a load of hassle and people taking the piss
Why not go on her adultwork page and read it.

[cueball]

Didn`t spit my dummy out,

If you're dummy didn't get spat, it certainly had a major wobble 

Here, have a read, it's comedy gold....
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=124773.0;all
 

[goldwing1]

If you're dummy didn't get spat, it certainly had a major wobble 

Here, have a read, it's comedy gold....
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=124773.0;all
 

Whatever you think of the review and wether you agree with my writing style ( i`m not a journalist ) shouldn`t really be the issue,  at the end of the day, it was a cracking good punt and I think you would be hard pressed to find any negative feedback about her

[bigthickdick]

Whatever you think of the review and wether you agree with my writing style ( i`m not a journalist ) shouldn`t really be the issue,  at the end of the day, it was a cracking good punt and I think you would be hard pressed to find any negative feedback about her

Again nobody says that you weren't honest in your review. In fact the wg who you tried reviewing has cracking reviews written by very highly reputable reviewers so we all know that she is very good at what she does. But here we need certain information to accept a review as a review. That first attempt of yours didn't have all those infos. The last one you've posted as a comment yesterday does. Please keep posting in a form of a review making sure to include all the necessary infos. Use your yesterday's post as a guideline, anything less would be not enough but that much or more would be welcomed by everyone here. 

[cueball]

Whatever you think of the review and wether you agree with my writing style ( i`m not a journalist ) shouldn`t really be the issue,  at the end of the day, it was a cracking good punt and I think you would be hard pressed to find any negative feedback about her

You're writing style had no bearing on anything, your lack of useable info did... that's why it went from review thread to discussion thread 

I'm 100% sure you're failing grasp the meaning of the advice and comments from anybody 

You can take an horse to water but you can't make it drink

See my avatar... fits you like a glove