Link: External Link/Members OnlyPrice: £100 for 30 mins (including OWO, DFK and sex)
I saw this girl Monday evening but she's already put her price up massively (but I think only for the half hour). Although at least now there's now some "value" in seeing her for longer than half an hour. I don't usually review girls so soon after the meet but I figured this may help people who want to see her today in Manchester (and of course elsewhere in the future).
Now frankly there's many things wrong with her profile and her pricing. I also didn't seem to read her previous review thread properly. Frankly, I'm surprised I booked her but I did and I am happy that I did however this definitely won't be a "shouting from the rooftops review". Here's a good quote from another escort on why her profile comes across badly/arrogant (the bits in quotation marks are directly from her profile):
seems a bit full of herself
"Please don't put ME in the bracket of the lower rate girls if I am out of your price range then there are many other girls you can see. But it won't be the clean sexy classy experience I provide. "
um so us 120 ph girls are not clean classy or sexy??
"I am a high end girl. I have expensive lingerie. Expensive hotel rooms. Drinks. Men's products for you to use. This is an exclusive experience."
ditto love to the expensive lingerie posh flat drinks and products but still doesnt make you any better?? 
Location: Good hotel near Piccadilly station. The hotel was good but I recently saw a girl in a similarly good hotel (very nearby) and she was £70 for half an hour (and I think £120 for the hour etc).
Looks: Most of her pictures are likely a bit out of date and possibly also airbrushed (some of them, particularly the ones on her main page). Most of them make her look younger, cuter and a bit more "flawless" than she actually is. I would however say that her "All black lingerie and lace robe" picture in her gallery is pretty accurate and a good representation (certainly of her face). To be honest, I expected her to not look as good as her pics and was just expecting a hot MILF and that's what I got. So in a way, I'm letting her get away with misleading pics which is not good at all but I'm just pointing this out so you can understand my expectations and where I'm coming from. She claims to be a size 12 and I think she is, probably on the larger end but not a 14. She looks a touch bigger than the "accurate" photo I mentioned above. On that note, if someone could provide a link to a step-by-step guide to uploading pics I'd be very grateful as I think they'd enhance my reviews but I'm too much of an old fogey to know how to do it (and evidently I'm too lazy to use the search bar).
There doesn't seem to be a mention on her profile of whether her tits are natural but they looked and certainly felt natural. She also only indirectly mentions her cup size in her FAQ but 36E seems accurate. Her tits were very nice. Her profile says she's 31 (and this is supported by her porn info) but in person she said she was 33 and this seems accurate. Overall, she's good looking and definitely fits in the "hot MILF" category.
Service: Good OWO but not amazing considering she's a pornstar, particularly in terms of depth (although I didn't actually ask her to go any deeper). Nice eye contact during the BJ (although frankly that's something I much prefer in missionary but I rarely get it or at least not much). Good DFK. Enthusiastic sex in a variety of positions and she didn't go OTT with the "porno talk" or moaning.
Overall: Good looking, good service, good attitude.
Despite her profile (and her previous review) I didn't get a stuck-up or arrogant vibe and I thought her attitude and personality were good/likeable. She is however used to a certain lifestyle and combined with her pricing, it can't be said she's the most down to earth girl but her AW feedback suggests she gets plenty of business so fair play to her (although I don't think it should be encouraged).
She's overpriced (unless you really care about her being a pornstar) and has photos that are a bit misleading (albeit I was expecting that although the fact that many others do it too is no excuse) so this is clearly a generous positive but aside from those issues I didn't find much fault with her and I certainly enjoyed myself so it's a positive for me.
