Abellaxo aka Ana Luiza, London (Incall)

[cduz]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


First time posting for me, but had to share this gem

Appearance
Pictures are a great representation of her, but once you see her in person...wow. Simply stunning and with such a cute smile. Curves in all the right places

Price
170 for the hour and added 20 for filming

Location
Very nice hotel in Shep Bush

Communications
I was inquiring about making a booking however she was fully booked when i contacted her, I told her to reply back to me if anyone ended up cancelling. Sure enough she contacted me day before saying she had a cancellation so I took that opportunity and confirmed my booking. Very easy communication as English is her first language.

Physicality
Her body is nicer than your favorite pornstar's...believe me. When I first took a glance at her upon entering, I looked her up and down, she just giggled because she knew exactly what I was thinking (HOLY FUCK YOU'RE HOT).

Experience
Walked in and was greeted with a smile and very sexy outfit, fishnet stockings with some red heels. I hopped in the shower, hopped out with just my towel wrapped around my waist. She was on the bed, ass poking out. I couldn't help myself and dove right in face first. Her pussy was so tasty that I probably could have ate her out for the whole hour, she certainly enjoyed this as much as I did. After a few minutes of RO it was time for some OWO. She played the GFE / pornstar experience very well. Right away she got very into it and it was the perfect sloppy blowjob every guy wishes for. Lots of eye contact which is great with such a pretty face. Straight after we went into 69, she didn't shy away from deepthroating me while getting her booty licked, if anything the blowjob got more intense.

Didn't want to pop yet so had her put a condom on and let her ride me. Condoms always kill my erection, but once i was in that warm wet pussy for a a few seconds, I was back =D. I soon turned her over for doggy, REALLY enjoyed my view fucking her from the back and slapping her buttcheeks. She arched her back just the way I like it and I knew I was going to pop after a few minutes in this position. Once I was ready, I pulled out, took off the condom and busted all over her. She grabbed my dick and gave me a nice sensual lick (such a turn on). Most girls would probably go straight for the wet wipes lol

Had some time to relax as I was pretty tired after the doggy. Chatted a bit, really cute girl and seems genuine when speaking to her. Not boring small talk either, someone you can enjoy your time with and have a laugh. Few moments later we just enjoyed oral on eachother, kissin, licking, all the good stuff until the end of the booking. Once we were finished I had my shower and said my goodbyes. Left with a big goofy smile on my face.

Pro’s
Nice hotel, dressed the part, very responsive, her moans alone will get you hard, TASTY. Did I mention shes one of the hottest girls I've seen? ha. Plus I'm from the US so I miss my Latinas, this reminded me of all the beautiful women back home with curly hair and sexy curves.

Con’s
Having to leave =/


Overall, A+ all across the board.

[a203203]

is the only way to make the booking through AW mail? also is she realy 5' 9"? or hopefully more petite?

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

is the only way to make the booking through AW mail? also is she realy 5' 9"? or hopefully more petite?

She's 5'9" pal

[Link7]

Pleased she's a great provider, and OP had a great time. 

But can we please leave the fluffy shite on UKE.

Her body is nicer than our favourite porn star...her pussy was so tasty that you could have ate her out for the whole hour  these are comments for her UKE photos. Run along and tell her, I'm sure she'll give you a 'like'. 

This is UKP. Just review your experience. Of course give your opinion, but don't say that somebody's body is better than everyone else's favourite. You weren't joking either. Get a grip, man.

[cduz]

Pleased she's a great provider, and OP had a great time. 

But can we please leave the fluffy shite on UKE.

Her body is nicer than our favourite porn star...her pussy was so tasty that you could have ate her out for the whole hour  these are comments for her UKE photos. Run along and tell her, I'm sure she'll give you a 'like'. 

This is UKP. Just review your experience. Of course give your opinion, but don't say that somebody's body is better than everyone else's favourite. You weren't joking either. Get a grip, man.

lol coming from the guy that fucked and reviewed a girl with a guy's body and another that is mostly plastic lmao

I'll review how I want since it was my first review, and especially because it was a really good fuck, hopefully others can appreciate my feedback

[tantric talents]

I see her prices are creeping up. In my notes at 160 when she was in Paddington.

[Link7]

lol coming from the guy that fucked and reviewed a girl with a guy's body and another that is mostly plastic lmao

I'll review how I want since it was my first review, and especially because it was a really good fuck, hopefully others can appreciate my feedback

Childish. I didn't criticise her looks, just your OTT writing. But ok, carry on wanking and don't listen 

[Jvosta]

Childish. I didn't criticise her looks, just your OTT writing. But ok, carry on wanking and don't listen 

Don't troll him link.
I was very impressed with his essay, wonder if he writes that well in school

[Randy Focker]

Thanks Cduz, I found the review helpful for my next London venture

[Thepacifist]

With experience you'll be fucking hotties and won't be so ott about it 

[peter purves]

Cheers for the review

Cduz you say whether she is an entrant for the Bubble Butt thread - I know that perennial question again 

[Steely Dan]

Cheers for the review

Cduz you say whether she is an entrant for the Bubble Butt thread - I know that perennial question again 

By your own admission, you know this is getting old.  By all means post your list - many value it.  I help with the Tontober list - we all have our things.  But daily?  Perhaps better on a wiki page and your own list, not asking about the same prossie repeatedly. Here is the same question about the same prossie from the same punter, ie you.

Perennial question time

Is she a contender for the Bubble Butt thread?

Cheers!!

[peter purves]

By your own admission, you know this is getting old.  By all means post your list - many value it.  I help with the Tontober list - we all have our things.  But daily?  Perhaps better on a wiki page and your own list, not asking about the same prossie repeatedly. Here is the same question about the same prossie from the same punter, ie you.

Sorry that it irks you but is the perennial question asked every day??

For research purposes, I have to ask because

1. It has not been mentioned in the review and I did not see the WG concerned, so I cannot confirm for sure whether she is a worthy contender for the  Bubble Butt thread or not

2. First-hand empirical evidence is somewhat better than mere conjecture on my part. Notwithstanding that this would be the reviewer's own subjective definition of the terms as outlined in the thread - that is if they are aware of it of course

3. If it is in the affirmative, then if the reviewer does not place the WG in the Bubble Butt thread (which most don't), then you know I sure will.

 

[Brazilian Martian]

By your own admission, you know this is getting old.  By all means post your list - many value it.  I help with the Tontober list - we all have our things.  But daily?  Perhaps better on a wiki page and your own list, not asking about the same prossie repeatedly. Here is the same question about the same prossie from the same punter, ie you.

+ 50,000
   

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Brazilian Martian]

Op not bad for a first review but the quote about pornstar body  seems like you're laying it on thick and I'm not surprised others may find it somewhat fluffy. As it's your first report I'm sure others will give you a chance,  next time you review just be more mindful.

[Freddie Boswell]

She's 5'9" pal

In my experience, you need to take an SP's given height with a pinch of salt; as you would with their ages:   
Age = add five years
Height = add five inches
 

[mcgee121]

Op not bad for a first review but the quote about pornstar body  seems like you're laying it on thick and I'm not surprised others may find it somewhat fluffy. As it's your first report I'm sure others will give you a chance,  next time you review just be more mindful.

My favourite pornstar is Riley Reid and I certainly do think this girl has a better body than her.  Besides, the curvy types with the flat stomach and giant tits that we all love.  I do like "modelesque" Victoria Secret looking bodies which I think this girl has and remarked on in YLF's review.

[Brazilian Martian]

My favourite pornstar is Riley Reid and I certainly do think this girl has a better body than her.  Besides, the curvy types with the flat stomach and giant tits that we all love.  I do like "modelesque" Victoria Secret looking bodies which I think this girl has and remarked on in YLF's review.

Not sure why you quoted me. The porn star quote was kinda fluffy that the op posted on his review. Plus he seemed to get in his feelings about being called out. He's been a member since 2015 so he should know better imo

Hidden Image/Members Only

[mcgee121]

With experience you'll be fucking hotties and won't be so ott about it 

This girl is top tier on AW.  She may not be to your taste but her "body type" is rare and her pics probably reflect reality  .  I would have seen her in a heartbeat if I didn't feel she was limited service wise.  I didn't see anything over fluffy imo about his review and thought he did a good job by providing some new information about her that I didn't know already.  It's good to see foreigners like the OP making use of the forum. 

[mcgee121]

Not sure why you quoted me. The porn star quote was kinda fluffy

Hidden Image/Members Only

I don't think it can be deemed fluffy if it's factual.  Most pornstars without the work done look very ordinary.  But you did state "kinda fluffy" which I could agree with or maybe he was just being deliberately hyperbolic to emphasize how fit he thought she was.

Plus he seemed to get in his feelings about being called out. He's been a member since 2015 so he should know better imo

No one likes getting called out particularly if they feel it's unjustified and have to waste time addressing nonsense claims.  Me replying to you was not calling you out just sharing a difference of opinion.  Of course, you're a prolific reviewer so the OP should take your critique on board and you didn't come at him sideways so he shouldn't take it the wrong way.

[PLeisure]

I would have seen her in a heartbeat if I didn't feel she was limited service wise.

Good point - she started off with Anal on her list; it's since been removed. Or maybe it was drawing too much attention so she's being discrete about it.

Undeniably attractive, certainly facially - bit too big for my personal tastes but will surely generate keen interest. The reviews suggest a smart girl who can engage well with punters, so I wish her success. 
The main put-off was her constantly fluctuating rates... a baseline £150, then £170, and £190 at one point. Sometimes, this would include anal, other times it was an extra. In fairness, she does seem to have settled at £170 now, but no anal   

[Brazilian Martian]

I don't think it can be deemed fluffy if it's factual.  Most pornstars without the work done look very ordinary.  But you did state "kinda fluffy" which I could agree with or maybe he was just being deliberately hyperbolic to emphasize how fit he thought she was.

No one likes getting called out particularly if they feel it's unjustified and have to waste time addressing nonsense claims.  Me replying to you was not calling you out just sharing a difference of opinion.  Of course, you're a prolific reviewer so the OP should take your critique on board and you didn't come at him sideways so he shouldn't take it the wrong way.

I was not calling you fluffy i was on about the op. But he came out on attack mode when he was posting a reply back to Link7

[mcgee121]

Good point - she started off with Anal on her list; it's since been removed. Or maybe it was drawing too much attention so she's being discrete about it.

Undeniably attractive, certainly facially - bit too big for my personal tastes but will surely generate keen interest. The reviews suggest a smart girl who can engage well with punters, so I wish her success. 
The main put-off was her constantly fluctuating rates... a baseline £150, then £170, and £190 at one point. Sometimes, this would include anal, other times it was an extra. In fairness, she does seem to have settled at £170 now, but no anal 

Facially I would rate her a 7.5 to 8; it's her body that really intrigues me.  I think she told me her rate is £220/£230 for 1.5 hours which I think is good VFM for a good looking girl.  Many on my HL price themselves at £300 for 1.5 hours which I think is too much. 

I think British girls offering anal services is getting harder to find now.  There are at least 2 British SPs that have flat out denied ever offering it when they so did  .  MissMelolicious (External Link/Members Only) was supposed to be a "anal queen" but imo she has gone bonkers and I'm not sure what she is offering anymore.

Abellaxo wouldn't even have to do anything as extreme as anal but she has a few things missing that I like.

[mcgee121]

I was not calling you fluffy i was on about the op. But he came out on attack mode when he was posting a reply back to Link7

Yeah I got your point but I think everyone has a right to defend their review.  To be honest, I didn't even read the OP's comments and still haven't.  Do you think Abellaxo is overpriced?

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

In my experience, you need to take an SP's given height with a pinch of salt; as you would with their ages:   
Age = add five years
Height = add five inches
 

In many cases yes, but I've seen her pal, both her age and height are accurate, in heels she was around the same height as me, 6'1".

[Brazilian Martian]

Yeah I got your point but I think everyone has a right to defend their review.  To be honest, I didn't even read the OP's comments and still haven't.  Do you think Abellaxo is overpriced?

Lol well that's another story, I personally don't watch a next man's pockets, if other punters want to pay that price then it's up to them. But when I'm paying 150 or over I need anal or at least cim with porn type prices.

She has pretty face but no tits or ass at all, her body seems kinda off similar to a teen going through puberty for my tastes. But that's just my opinion

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

Lol well that's another story, I personally don't watch a next man's pockets, if other punters want to pay that price then it's up to them. But when I'm paying 150 or over I need anal or at least cim with porn type prices.

She has pretty face but not tits or ass her body seems kinda off   teen puberty for my tastes. But that's just my opinion

Hidden Image/Members Only

BM, she is a young, great looking, all natural girl, delivered cim/facial with gusto, anal not my thing, fully engaged, smart and pricing works for me.

[Brazilian Martian]

BM, she is a young, great looking, all natural girl, delivered cim/facial with gusto, anal not my thing, fully engaged, smart and pricing works for me.

Ok fair enough but why does her prices go up and down like a yoyo 

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

Ok fair enough but why does her prices go up and down like a yoyo 

No idea, finding a level I guess.

[Thepacifist]

This girl is top tier on AW.  She may not be to your taste but her "body type" is rare and her pics probably reflect reality  .  I would have seen her in a heartbeat if I didn't feel she was limited service wise.  I didn't see anything over fluffy imo about his review and thought he did a good job by providing some new information about her that I didn't know already.  It's good to see foreigners like the OP making use of the forum.

Don't assume she's not to my taste.

I encourage those who want to review, be they foreign or not. Never did I insinuate that.

Him saying: 'I could lick her out for the whole hour' and 'Cons: having to leave =['

I thought that was hyperbolic.

Leaving without the strings is the best part, the sooner he learns that the better.

[MrMatrix]

Thanks OP for the review- personally I thought is was fine for a first post. She's now on my HL. 

[Link7]

I don't think it can be deemed fluffy if it's factual.

The quote was "Her body is nicer than your favourite pornstar's".  That's factual? What are you talking about?

[monstar]

A bit fluffy but useful review, thanks OP. 

Seems she provides a top experience and has a serious effect on her visitors, looks stunning too. 

[MrMatrix]

Surely we should be encouraging first time reviewers not being picky. Many members are reluctant to do reviews because of this. If the OP wants to be a bit fluffy - well fine -its his review. As Link7 said this review is more factual.
We should be encouraging first time reporting. Theres nothng wrong with this review. Please keeping posting OP.

[mcgee121]

Don't assume she's not to my taste.

  I thought you only liked big jugs.

I encourage those who want to review, be they foreign or not. Never did I insinuate that.

I never implied that you didn't.

Him saying: 'I could lick her out for the whole hour' and 'Cons: having to leave =['

I think everyone should be themselves.  Some people write with a bit of "colour".  Personally on the fluff scale I thought this was very low.  To me, I don't find those quotes strange because some people are into body worship and favour longer sessions like myself.

[Link7]

Surely we should be encouraging first time reviewers not being picky. Many members are reluctant to do reviews because of this. If the OP wants to be a bit fluffy - well fine -its his review. As Link7 said this review is more factual.
We should be encouraging first time reporting. Theres nothng wrong with this review. Please keeping posting OP.

I never tried to discourage him from posting. I congratulated him on a good punt. It used to be ok to tell people things straight on this site. "I'll review how I want" he doesn't sound like a timid man who needs his feelings protected.

From the way he replied to me, I think he just wants to boast that he shags the most attractive prostitutes.

I don't think he's remotely fussed what I said. Worrying that he is going to run away and not post again...come on that would be a complete overreaction. He can see that others have praised his review anyway.

[MrMatrix]

I never tried to discourage him from posting. I congratulated him on a good punt. It used to be ok to tell people things straight on this site. "I'll review how I want" he doesn't sound like a timid man who needs his feelings protected.

I don't think he's remotely fussed what I said. Worrying that he is going to run away and not post again...come on that would be a complete overreaction. He can see that others have praised his review anyway.

Sorry if I was ambiguous  Link7- my comment wasn't aimed at you mate- I was agreeing with you.

[Thepacifist]

I feel like I was too quick to judge, thanks for the review OP. Glad to hear she gave you a great time and you enjoyed yourself.

Thanks for the reply mcgee, all good. I do prefer big jugs but I like them all as long as they're natural.

[cduz]

Cheers for the review

Cduz you say whether she is an entrant for the Bubble Butt thread - I know that perennial question again 

Sorry for late replies, not very active here on here

I would add her into the bubble butt thread as that is the first thing i look for in a punt (besides face)

Not the biggest booty after seeing the thread, but its NATURAL and she has a great figure fit for it, certainly a formidable contender 


Also thank you everyone for the kind words, hope whoever went to go see her enjoyed themselves as much as I did