I saw Gemma the other day in Cambridge:-
External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members OnlyI was pondering long and hard whether to rate this as neutral or negative. In the end I went for the neutral rating.
Reason for this is because having read the reviews fully I knew going into the punt what to expect so I was under no illusions. However for the past 2 or 3 years Gemma was someone I've always wanted to see for myself as she used to get great reviews in 2014 and 2015 and bad ones more recently, but still there was an opportunity to see her and I thought why not judge for myself.
As I said after reading the reviews I knew to expect a vanilla service and that some of her pictures were out of date. The last couple of reviews stated she put on the pounds, but she didn't look as heavy as the descriptions in those reviews said she was. I would say her October 2015 pictures are still pretty accurate. I have to say facially she is good looking and reminds me so much of Abbie from Eastenders - don't know if anyone else thought that?
Onto the punt and reasons why it wasn't a negative. Communications was good and profile accurate in terms of services offered. Good directions to her hotel as well.
Started off with some oral and it was very good and another reason it wasn't a negative as her oral skills are very good. That lasted a good 10-15 mins then a bit of 69. She then asked if I wanted a condom on and we did a few positions cowboy, missionary and reverse cowboy. After that I needed a breather and got some more oral without a condom and I popped over her tits.
Gemma was quite mechanical but as I said having read the reviews I knew what to expect so it was a vanilla service.
Would I see her again? Not for an hour she is way too expensive but if she ever did 30 min bookings and I was in desperate need of a punt and as I only see British women then as they are few and far between in Cambridge she'd make the list by default
But at the bottom.
If I hadn't had read the reviews and didn't go into the booking knowing what to expect it would have been a negative so
to UkP and to my fellow members for their reviews.
