External Link/Members Only£100 for 1-hour incall
Communication: by text and voice. Made easy by Lolla's excellent English.
LocationTown-house in Swindon. The front door of the house is set back about two yards from the pavement of the main road, offering at least a modicum of discretion provided the door is answered quickly, which for me it was. The workroom itself was tidy and fairly clean.
Brothel alert: At least one other WG works in the next-but-one room.
Parking: On-road and busy, but there were a few spaces and it appears to be free and unrestricted.
Accessibility: If you're in a chair, forget it. If you're in a jet-pack, you might just make it up the two flights of narrow, slightly winding stairs, but you won't make it back down.
AppearanceDoes Lolla look like the pictures on her profile? All those pictures are all of her tits, arse or legs. The tits in the photos look good. Lolla's tits are good.
The rest of her is standard-issue: arms, torso, head, etc., all in the usual configuration. She has a fairly ordinary face, but it's improved when she smiles and it positively lights up when she smiles for real.
Age-wise, she's written thirty-seven on her profile and that's probably within five of the reality.
Size ten to twelve, as she says? Could be at the upper margin. She's about five-three and she ain't skinny. She looks like women tend to look after they've been living in Swindon for more than five years, which she said she has.
One bad point: Lolla's skin is frankly rough, from her belly down at the front and all over her back. Think lunar surface.
PersonalityWarm, welcoming, chatty without being intrusive, interesting. Passive during the action, but still reasonably engaged and cheerful.
No problems at all with communication, because her English is superb. Her accent makes it clear she isn't a native English speaker; her profile says she's Spanish, but she isn't. If I had to guess, I'd say Polish. I don't know why she doesn't just tell the truth on her profile.
ServicesServices advertised: massage, FK, GFE, OWO
Services performed: massage, HR, 69, penetration - mish, doggy, cowgirl (sort of)
Services refused: OWO, kissing
Yes, no kissing. Forget DFK or FK, I didn't even get a peck on the cheek. Wtf? I did try breathing on some paint on the way out and it didn't crinkle, so I don't think hygiene was the problem.
As for oral, when that seemed to both of us to be a good thing to do next, she declared emphatically that she was now putting a condom on me. I don't like OW, so I told her not to bother. She looked shocked - very briefly. I have to admit that I didn't demand OWO, because the punt was going well in other respects and I wanted it to continue to go well. It's possible that she would, had I insisted, have performed the service. But she should have done it anyway, without argument, because OWO was right there on her profile.
Of the things she DID do, the stand-out success was the oily massage, which she did very well.
HR was very promising at the start, but after a couple of minutes it became disappointingly obvious that she didn't really know how to finish the job. Penetration was also disappointing, owing to her lack of effort and her not being remotely as tight as she claimed (although YMMV because I'm hung like a crayon). She moved VERY slowly in cowgirl, and not because she was enjoying it.
She pretended to cum during 69. She did seem a bit turned on, but I doubt she was THAT into it. Even so, it was a thoughtful gesture and quite well done, with some good muscle-tightening and gentle moaning instead of louder and less credible noises.
During the sessionNo clock-watching.
No time-wasting.
No interruptions.
Gave me her full attention throughout.
After we finishedFriendly, with pleasant chat that for once was free of intrusive questions about marital status, place of work, etc.
SummaryPros: genuinely pleasant personality; good tits; good attitude; very good massage; fair HR at first; free on-road parking; safe; no time-wasting and no interruptions; excellent English
Cons: profile blatantly misleading, including prominently advertised services not delivered; poor skin; multiple-occupancy venue; intermittent lack of effort
Would recommend to others? No. I'd really like to say yes, but I can't, because a pleasant personality is insufficient compensation for failure to deliver advertised services as basic as OWO and FK.
Would I see her again? No. I thought I would, but I've already had a couple of perfect opportunities to do so and not taken either.
