Author Topic: Holly Ryder - Oldbury  (Read 5653 times)


18 review(s) for Holly Ryder (13 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]
22 review(s) for HOLLIE_RYDER (15 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Littlefoot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,718
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 140
This lady popped up a couple of times on the wm reviews section. One thing stood out for me, the constant mention of DFK. As I'm such a fan thought I'd give her a go!

External Link/Members Only

COMMS
Fired off a text at 7am looking for a late morning/early afternoon booking. I'd half given up, then I receive a text back at 10.30 am. So obviously a late riser. All comms done by text thereafter. No issues.

LOCATION & VENUE
It's in Oldbury somewhere. I got the train to Langley green, then walked from there. (25 mins walk). Didn't think it was that far. Would of got a taxi if I'd known. Holly is based in a hotel. It's a very discreet entrance, with gym users using the same door on the side of the hotel. It's a bit of a maze inside. I got slightly lost on the way in, and on the way out. Parking looks good if travelling by car. The actual room was clean and tidy and fit for purpose.

FEE & BOOKING
I paid £80 for 45 mins.

HOLLY
She's from around the Black Country judging by her accent. She's no stick insect. Must be a size 14-16. Nice sized natural tits on her, bit of a belly. Pleasant enough face, with long bleached blond hair. Not bad, if you like the slightly larger lady. She has a nice looking shaven cunt on her.

SERVICES
DFK, OWO, RO, rimming on her, protected sex in CG and missionary.

THE ACTION
I tap gently on the door, and holly is doing the usual hide behind it trick. I was reasonably happy when I saw her. She has a decent face, and was wearing some lacy underwear, and hold up black stockings.

Once in the room, we sort the finances out. I request a shower, as I'd walked a long way, so I was a tad hot and sweaty. Her reply was "yeah ok but it's in your time!" I said "really, it's not normally" her reply was "I've been doing this 2 years now, it's always included in your time!" My reply, before ducking into the shower was "I've been doing this 5 years, and your the first to say that to me!"

So not a good start, I thought great, she's got an attitude. I decided to ignore those comments, and just carry on. Post shower I join her on the bed. We have friendly chat for precisely one minute. Then we begin DFK. Which was excellent, tongues the lot. Very passionate. She loves doing this, Stiffened my cock right up. We continue kissing for some time. Didn't take her long to work out I enjoy this. Plenty of mutual touching, and tit sucking at this stage. I ask her to suck my knob. Her reply was "try and fucking stop me!" She then gave me OWO, which was decent, plenty of spitting on my cock which I love, very sloppy with good depth. No ball licking though.

I ask if she'd like her cunt licked. Her reply was "too fucking right!" Or words very similar. She asks me how I'd like her, so I jump off the bed, kneel on the floor and position her lying on the edge of the bed. Gave her cunt and clit a good old licking, which she seemed to enjoy, judging by her moans. Also gave her arse a good rimming while I was there. Everything downstairs was all fresh and tasty. No issues there.

I go back for more DFK as to regain my erection. Which done the trick in quick fast time. I ask for the hat, which she applies, nice tight hood. She's asks "how do you want me?" I tell her to get on top. Excellent prolonged session of CG, which went on ages and was very enjoyable. She asks me to fuck her doggy. I say "let's do mish." I wanted to snog her whilst fucking. Started at a very slow pace, whilst all the time eating her face off. Gradually I pick the pace up, eventually I was giving her a proper energetic pounding, which seemed to go on for ever. I'm too old for that kind of vigorous sex, I was fucked. I was getting the usual appropriate moans and groans from Holly, she defo seemed to be enjoying. 

Finally I have one of my best climaxes I've had for a long time, and deposit a right hefty load into the sock. Considering I'd popped a mere 24 hours earlier, there was a right load. And with 40 mins on the clock I thought I might as well take another shower, as I did everything I came for, and was more than satisfied.

VERDICT
Glad I ignored the little hiccup at the start. Thereafter she was very friendly, and had a great attitude. It developed into a very successful, positive punt.
Holly is a very confident girl. Who genuinely enjoys herself. Not sure if I'd return, it's a bit of a trek for me. But if I lived closer... yes defo would. She loves a good fucking.

I think she's a bit busy. Whilst showering I heard her on the phone to another punter saying she can't fit him in. She had two others booked in after myself.

Offline Jawbreak

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 546
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Thanks for the review LF  :thumbsup:
Sounds like you had a great time ;)
I think she is a bit too big for me, as im a skinny cunt myself, I like my girls size 10/12 max.
May be if im in a big girl mood id pay her a visit.

 :hi:
Banned reason: White-knight
Banned by:

Offline Stapler

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 3,786
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 6
Good report LF.

If you go there again, or the other hotel by the island, get the train from New Street to Sandwell and Dudley. Then 4, 4H or 4M outside the station to the motorway island. M :hi:

Banned reason: For having fuck all useful to say
Banned by: Head1

Offline PepeMAGA

Cheers LF,  again as JB says maybe a bit large for me,  but seems like a good plan B and gives a bit of clarity on her other reviews.

Offline Littlefoot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,718
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 140
Good report LF.

If you go there again, or the other hotel by the island, get the train from New Street to Sandwell and Dudley. Then 4, 4H or 4M outside the station to the motorway island. M :hi:

Thanks S

I may go again, as I enjoyed her company. So thanks for the info, could come in really useful!

 :thumbsup:

Offline Littlefoot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,718
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 140
Cheers LF,  again as JB says maybe a bit large for me,  but seems like a good plan B and gives a bit of clarity on her other reviews.

Thanks PM,

Always great to get a good mix of as many different reviews as possible. As we as punters all have different tastes, and differing likes.     :hi:


Offline Digger1965

Thanks for the review LF, looks like a good punt. I do like blondes and not into skinny girls. Just sounds a bit of a trek to get to...worth trying if in the area though.

Oralbgood

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Thanks LF. I would never have thought she would have been size 14/16 from her pictures.

Proves my theory that if a girl does not put her stats on A/W she might be a little larger.

Mind you, I am so pleased I don't have to put my stats/photo on display  :lol:

Regards

OBD

Offline Littlefoot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,718
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 140
Thanks LF. I would never have thought she would have been size 14/16 from her pictures.

Proves my theory that if a girl does not put her stats on A/W she might be a little larger.

Mind you, I am so pleased I don't have to put my stats/photo on display  :lol:

Regards

OBD

She does mention on her aw profile she's a curvy size 12. But she is slightly larger than that. IMHO. Perhaps she had a good Christmas!

 :hi:
« Last Edit: January 20, 2017, 08:06:12 am by Littlefoot »

Offline oneeyesnake

LF, is she okay with fingers during RO?
OES.

Offline Littlefoot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,718
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 140
LF, is she okay with fingers during RO?
OES.

I only rubbed her clit, so not sure if she does fingers inside.

Offline oneeyesnake

Thanks, will just have to try it out. OES.  :P

seward

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
All very suspicious, sudden influx of new members with glowing adulation for Holly,  then there seems to be one or two that have the complete opposite views, the worst bit is the hygiene issues, when it comes to deciding I think,  and its only an opinion, I would favour the negatives, and avoid any WG who suddenly gets such well prepared testimonials!  Or maybe these have a bit or a whiff as well :hi:

Offline Andy Q

Seward, why the sudden post, 8 weeks after the last on this review?

I have been on this forum a year longer than you with a similar number of reviews. I resent you suggesting I have been manipulated into my remarks. I approached Holly with trepidation as I had read the same remarks as you but in both visits I have had with Holly her hygiene has been impeccable. The reviewer whom you questioned has also posted an impressive 61 reviews.

You state you favour the negatives, perhaps it is you that has an agenda...your post was rather out of the blue?

Offline Littlefoot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,718
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 140
All very suspicious, sudden influx of new members with glowing adulation for Holly,  then there seems to be one or two that have the complete opposite views, the worst bit is the hygiene issues, when it comes to deciding I think,  and its only an opinion, I would favour the negatives, and avoid any WG who suddenly gets such well prepared testimonials!  Or maybe these have a bit or a whiff as well :hi:

This review is a true portrayal of my experience with the girl, in both her physical appearance, her hygiene standards, and her overall performance. Obviously with everyone's reviews ymmv! But ALL my reviews are what honestly happened, and what I experienced. To be quite honest it is an insult to question my integrity! I may have only been on this forum since last July, but you have only been on an additional 6 months!

Why bump MY review up to vent your suspicions, when there have been more recent positive reviews on the girl? that's suspicious!
 :hi:
« Last Edit: April 07, 2017, 09:44:01 pm by Littlefoot »

seward

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I also read the Stu666 review perhaps that was the one I ment to comment on, both reviews deal with the same WG, no one is suggesting what either of you have written is not your experience of Holly as no one is suggesting that the negatives are wrong,  I fail to see what the length  of membership has to do with making a post on a forum, unless of course time served somehow makes comments more or less valid,as I pointed out it was only my opinion on the reviews and other members posts. Now of course me replying will now bump your review up again which also didn't seem to suit.

Offline Littlefoot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,718
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 140
All very suspicious, sudden influx of new members with glowing adulation for Holly

Not exactly all new members, with the last two reviewers joining Jan 2014 and Jan 2015 respectively!

 :hi:

Offline Andy Q

You commented 'All very suspicious, sudden influx of new members with glowing adulation for Holly.' This suggests length of membership is important to you, now you say it is irrelevant, why?
You still haven't explained why you reinvigorated this post after 8 weeks?

seward

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Not exactly all new members, with the last two reviewers joining Jan 2014 and Jan 2015 respectively!

 :hi:

As I said before these were my thoughts on the Stu666 review, and no agenda on my part, I have seen some of your reviwed WGs, and concur with your reviews, so its no slight on your impressive amount of reviews, and I didn't make any reference to being  all new members on my post,but on the other review there was a lot of new registrations jumping to her defence, as it deals with the same WG all the reviews will end up together if anyone wants to bring them up on the search.

Offline Littlefoot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,718
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 140
I have seen some of your reviwed WGs, and concur with your reviews, so its no slight on your impressive amount of reviews

Thank you!

 :hi:

seward

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
You commented 'All very suspicious, sud
den influx of new members with glowing adulation for Holly.' This suggests length of membership is important to you, now you say it is irrelevant, why?
You still haven't explained why you reinvigorated this post after 8 weeks?
As I have said  I posted on the wrong review, and first posts defending a WG really that doesnt look suspicious, I suggest you have a look at the other review by Stu666, length of membership is of no interest whatsoever to me,  you are now this giving this review a whole new lease of life.

Offline Littlefoot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,718
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 140
As I said before these were my thoughts on the Stu666 review, and no agenda on my part,

on the other review there was a lot of new registrations jumping to her defence

I understand the mix up now!   :thumbsup:  perhaps you should of posted your suspicions on the appropriate review thread!   https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=127162.0

 :hi:
« Last Edit: April 08, 2017, 12:38:28 am by Littlefoot »

seward

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I understand the mix up now!   :thumbsup:  perhaps you should of posted your suspicions on the appropriate review thread!   https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=127162.0

 :hi:

Indeed I should, but occasionally things do go haywire, dont know why  :unknown: but this has been one of them,