Author Topic: FANTASY COURTESAN - mudchute  (Read 14148 times)


31 review(s) for FANTASY COURTESAN (30 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

bristolqwerty

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Mudchute?  Anyone else expected an intense anal review when reading the OP?  :)

mcgee121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Sorry mate  :hi:  and prossies????  unless you always keep your shirt on. Not a good move in my opinion. I think you'd actually be best advised maybe to ask Admin to delete; but your profile, your i.d., your choice, etc etc

+1 You never know when this shit could come back to bite you in the ass.

Offline Meursault

For what it's worth, I think it's wrong to post verification details publicly  :bomb:
I'd be lying if I said I wasn't interested in seeing a realistic face picture of a WG before seeing her. I only see girls who will offer me one.
However, it seems like an invasion of privacy to me. It should be the woman's choice.
She may be a WG but she still has rights surely?

Offline Bassman

For what it's worth, I think it's wrong to post verification details publicly  :bomb:
I'd be lying if I said I wasn't interested in seeing a realistic face picture of a WG before seeing her. I only see girls who will offer me one.
However, it seems like an invasion of privacy to me. It should be the woman's choice.
She may be a WG but she still has rights surely?

I dont understand how people get the varification photos when they have been hidden by the WG.

But I have no problem with seeing them. It's ore than likely representative of what you'll see when the door opens!

Offline Brazilian Martian

I dont understand how people get the varification photos when they have been hidden by the WG.

But I have no problem with seeing them. It's ore than likely representative of what you'll see when the door opens!

Sometimes they have it up for all to see, then they decided to make it private, fuck her feelings as she was wrongen from the start she had two profiles up trying to drum up business and white knight at the same time.

bristolqwerty

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
For what it's worth, I think it's wrong to post verification details publicly  :bomb:
I'd be lying if I said I wasn't interested in seeing a realistic face picture of a WG before seeing her. I only see girls who will offer me one.
However, it seems like an invasion of privacy to me. It should be the woman's choice.
She may be a WG but she still has rights surely?
I agree partly in principle.  If it's already on the profile then I'm happy to share.  If it's been then taken off then you're right it could've been for privacy reasons.  However it could be for more nefarious reasons like B&S.  I don't think anyone posts VP's to "sell out" an escort to her friends & family, it's just to make other punters aware of who's likely to be the other side of the door.  If you don't want your privacy exposed why post VP's on your profile in the first place?  :unknown:
This is a forum for punters helping other punters not ukescorting.   There's plenty of crucial things already not verified by many escorts in the first place.   :drinks:
« Last Edit: June 04, 2017, 12:14:41 pm by bristolqwerty »

Offline tark82

Unless a particular WG has scammed someone, or otherwise deserves public punishment, i think admin should in fact delete VP if requested.

If this wold be one of these bitches who regurarly change AW profiles and delivers shit service, I wouldn't have any issues with it. But in this case we have a prossie who appears to consistently deliver good service, and hasn't done anything to deserve which hunting.


For a full disclosure, I have seen this prossie last Thursday. I went to see her after reading two or three positive reviews and wasn't disapointed - she provided excellent service.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2017, 11:47:09 pm by tark82 »

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Unless a particular WG has scammed someone, or otherwise deserves public punishment, i think admin should in fact delete VP if requested.

In rare cases I believe he does. But in case you haven't noticed UKP IS NOT A DEMOCRACY. and Admin has much more experience and knowledge of these things than most of us put together. I trust his decisions implicitly.

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Unless a particular WG has scammed someone, or otherwise deserves public punishment, i think admin should in fact delete VP if requested.

If this wold be one of these bitches who regurarly change AW profiles and delivers shit service, I wouldn't have any issues with it. But in this case we have a prossie who appears to consistently deliver good service, and hasn't done anything to deserve which hunting.


For a full disclosure, I have seen this prossie last Thursday. I went to see her after reading two or three positive reviews and wasn't disapointed - she provided excellent service.

It would be appreciated, if you drop a review of your experience and contribute before you suggest reformation.

Offline advent2016

I was hoping that a location of Mudchute, anal would be a given.



Offline Joelawerence

Does she have tongue pierced, anyone knows?

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest



Offline Meursault

I'm not a member of her "fan club". I have no intention of hotlisting her, although don't think she looks that "rough" as someone else (who hadn't seen her) opined.
I just think if a girl has (politely) asked not to show her verification picture, the very least we should do is respect her privacy.
Lots of girls post this and then realise it's not private. AW give the girl the right to make it private and so should we - out of good manners and common humanity.

Offline claretandblue

I'm not a member of her "fan club". I have no intention of hotlisting her, although don't think she looks that "rough" as someone else (who hadn't seen her) opined.
I just think if a girl has (politely) asked not to show her verification picture, the very least we should do is respect her privacy.
Lots of girls post this and then realise it's not private. AW give the girl the right to make it private and so should we - out of good manners and common humanity.
She got banned for having multiple accounts so I would imagine her chances of getting that picture removed are somewhere between slim and none

Offline Brazilian Martian

I'm not a member of her "fan club". I have no intention of hotlisting her, although don't think she looks that "rough" as someone else (who hadn't seen her) opined.
I just think if a girl has (politely) asked not to show her verification picture, the very least we should do is respect her privacy.
Lots of girls post this and then realise it's not private. AW give the girl the right to make it private and so should we - out of good manners and common humanity.

Yep I have not seen her and I gave my opinion on her from the picture, I also called out 4 brand new reviews on one prossie in the space of a day which I thought was slightly odd as well imo. She got banned for having two profiles at the same time basically white knighting herself, then ACCUSING some punters of being sergeiS,  so fuck her and fuck her feelings she got her comeuppance.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Hidden Image/Members Only
:lol: her fanclub will be fuming
She'll probably want 'the picture taken down' next.  :D  :wacko:

Complaining that her nose ring is actually a different shape or that her skin isn't really so crinkly.   :cool:

Must've been the light.  :blush:

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
But your reviews ARE bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And personally I've no interest in tickling tonsils - too many things to catch, especially if they've been sucking monkey cocks

My reviews are not bullshit
They are based on pure undiluted truthful facts. .
Not an ounce of fiction...
Your opinion of my reviews is bullshit and you are entitled to that. ..
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
My reviews are not bullshit
They are based on pure undiluted truthful facts. .
Not an ounce of fiction...
Your opinion of my reviews is bullshit and you are entitled to that. ..

Let's rephrase that:
your reviews are bullshit
They are pure undiluted bullshit
Not an 'ounce of bullshit': more like several fucking tons
Our opinion of your reviews, to which forum members are entitled are predominantly:
                               ...that they are bullshit  :D :D :D

btw did this woman steal your photo? or did you steal hers? or was it part of a 'shared agreement'?

Hidden Image/Members Only
bullshit factory: mangos and other 'exotic' rubbish in: bullshit out

Please wipe well afterwards. Your McCoys 'guide' should make good bog paper.
  :hi:

Offline Brazilian Martian

Let's rephrase that:
your reviews are bullshit
They are pure undiluted bullshit
Not an 'ounce of bullshit': more like several fucking tons
Our opinion of your reviews, to which forum members are entitled are predominantly:
                               ...that they are bullshit  :D :D :D

btw did this woman steal your photo? or did you steal hers? or was it part of a 'shared agreement'?

Hidden Image/Members Only
bullshit factory: mangos and other 'exotic' rubbish in: bullshit out

Please wipe well afterwards. Your McCoys 'guide' should make good bog paper.
  :hi:

Ouchhhhhhh talk about going for the jugular. :thumbsup:

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Ouchhhhhhh talk about going for the jugular. :thumbsup:

tbh BM, the reason being, Tarzan has been around a long time, has been banned for his bullshit, then allowed back only for Admin to have the job of deleting most of his stupid posts. Either he doesn't get the message or he really is Not allowedor a Not allowedclone.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Let's rephrase that:
your reviews are bullshit
They are pure undiluted bullshit
Not an 'ounce of bullshit': more like several fucking tons
Our opinion of your reviews, to which forum members are entitled are predominantly:
                               ...that they are bullshit  :D :D :D

btw did this woman steal your photo? or did you steal hers? or was it part of a 'shared agreement'?

Hidden Image/Members Only
bullshit factory: mangos and other 'exotic' rubbish in: bullshit out

Please wipe well afterwards. Your McCoys 'guide' should make good bog paper.
  :hi:

So many negatives and neutrals on yours
Body massage bullshit
Whining about money
About extras this and thst
Can't afford it then DON'T GO !
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Brazilian Martian

So many negatives and neutrals on yours
Body massage bullshit
Whining about money
About extras this and thst
Can't afford it then DON'T GO !

Tarzan quit while you're ahead, I don't think have the wits to engage with Marmalade :hi:

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58

Offline anontom

I remember many years ago this Not allowedguy appeared in a TV documentary where they followed him around reviewing WGs. He looked a bit like Count Arthur Strong, if I remember correctly!

Offline Brazilian Martian

I remember many years ago this Not allowedguy appeared in a TV documentary where they followed him around reviewing WGs. He looked a bit like Count Arthur Strong, if I remember correctly!

Not allowedis cunt who wears a flat cap, his methods are out of date and he's no better than the other cunts that run and moderate prossienet  :hi:

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,651
  • Likes: 535
  •  
  • Reviews: 125

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,651
  • Likes: 535
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
Tarzan quit while you're ahead, I don't think have the wits to engage with Marmalade :hi:

He isn't ahead...but he does need to quit

Offline claretandblue

tbh BM, the reason being, Tarzan has been around a long time, has been banned for his bullshit, then allowed back only for Admin to have the job of deleting most of his stupid posts. Either he doesn't get the message or he really is Not allowedor a Not allowedclone.
You meant Mcfly not McCoy  :D ,yes I think you are right,there are many similarities between the original version and this "asian gorilla"  :sarcastic:

Offline Brazilian Martian

He isn't ahead...but he does need to quit

Lool my bad he definitely needs to quit

Offline SamLP

My reviews are not bullshit
They are based on pure undiluted truthful facts. .
Not an ounce of fiction...
Your opinion of my reviews is bullshit and you are entitled to that. ..

So the mangoes & snickers bar are real?  :lol:

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
So the mangoes & snickers bar are real?  :lol:

I know yiu have worked that 1 out yourself
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Bassman

So the mangoes & snickers bar are real?  :lol:

I guess he takes along a fruit and candy selection lol.