Sugar Babies
Live Cams
Shemales

Author Topic: Flagging scammer to AdultWork?  (Read 1302 times)

glasscentre2

  • Guest
If there is a girl repeatedly making new AW profiles and never genuinely accepting bookings, is it possible to flag them to AW in some way?
The girl in question is External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
I messaged her with a genuine, polite enquiry some months back, to which she responded positively. My next message to her was also polite, regarding rates for a particular service, but her reply was rude and accused me of wasting her time.
A few weeks later she had a new profile and I messaged her again with a similar enquiry, not realising it was the same girl. Again, initial response was polite, but then I figured out it was her. So I was very careful to phrase my next message as inoffensively and non-timewastery as possible. But once again she shot back rudeness and accusations of wasting her time.
I am certain she just likes leading punters on and then screaming abuse at them. She has made six or seven different profiles, all with the same/similar pictures, and usually using the name format "Sub XYZ". These profiles never last long.
After I messaged her I could report her to AW, but is it possible to do this without interaction with her?

Gatchaman

  • Guest
AW typically try to make it as difficult as possible to contact them.  Here are some hoops you can try jumping through:

If you look at the bottom of the profile, you should see an "Authentic Member?" link. 
Click that and it will open up a new page headed "Sub-lucy - Authentic? Genuine?". 
Right at the bottom of that page you should see "If you believe that Sub-lucy is in breach of our Terms of Use, then please report them to us here."
Click on that and you'll get the "Report Member" popup (assuming you don't have popups blocked in your browser.
From there, there are a half dozen or so links for various reasons that you can report a member that will take you to a form.

Not sure how much luck you will have.  Last time I tried to report someone to AW, it ended up in a cycle of automated responses where they just try to avoid speaking to you. :dash:

Offline Gordon Bennett

Why bother? What's the scam?? I'd be over the moon if the worst thing that happened to me in punting this year was receiving a rude kiss off to an enquiry..... chill out and get a sense of proportion over this trivial incident.

ClarkeOfTheCourse

  • Guest
AW typically try to make it as difficult as possible to contact them. 

Not sure how much luck you will have.  Last time I tried to report someone to AW, it ended up in a cycle of automated responses where they just try to avoid speaking to you. :dash:

AW don't care at all, in fact private gallery scammers are their favourite type of advert as they make commission off them

Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,986
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
AW don't care at all, in fact private gallery scammers are their favourite type of advert as they make commission off them

I would have thought otherwise. For every "scam" they delete, they end up retaining all her/ pimp's AW Credits.

ClarkeOfTheCourse

  • Guest
I would have thought otherwise. For every "scam" they delete, they end up retaining all her/ pimp's AW Credits.

Of course  :D

Online scutty brown

I've knocked several scammers off the site by reporting them to AW. Make a fake booking online so that you can post feedback on the lines of what you've posted here. Then use the reporting tool mentioned above. I find AW usually ditch the account within a day or two. Also works with accounts where the girl's not logged in for a month and doesn't respond. Send a message- no reply. Make a booking - no reply. Make a complaint and the profile gets burnt quickly. You just need to leave a trail in the AW feedback so they have something to justify closing the profile

glasscentre2

  • Guest
Why bother? What's the scam?? I'd be over the moon if the worst thing that happened to me in punting this year was receiving a rude kiss off to an enquiry..... chill out and get a sense of proportion over this trivial incident.
Let me simplify it: the scam is that she initially makes out that she will see you, and then suddenly switches and tells you to go to hell. Understand? She is a timewaster. I have no problem being told to go to hell off the bat, but that isn't what she's doing.
Why bother? In ordering that my fellow punters be less mucked around by a fake WG, but obviously you don't care if you're mucked around. Which is fine.

5th Musketeer

  • Guest
Let me simplify it: the scam is that she initially makes out that she will see you, and then suddenly switches and tells you to go to hell. Understand? She is a timewaster. I have no problem being told to go to hell off the bat, but that isn't what she's doing.
Why bother? In ordering that my fellow punters be less mucked around by a fake WG, but obviously you don't care if you're mucked around. Which is fine.
I have received several emails from AW advising of these "Lucy***" whatevers usually including "sub" somewhere, and as you say it's always the same profile with one or two pics.  But far from posting PGs, there is nothing but the original profile so it's not making money for AW.  And when I emailed one I got the same type of "bugger off" message you did if I asked a simple, non-threatening question.

glasscentre2

  • Guest
She's dropped Lucy and is now Louise:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
The profile wording is almost the same as before but she's popped in a new picture among the ones used in the past.

Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,986
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
She's dropped Lucy and is now Louise:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
The profile wording is almost the same as before but she's popped in a new picture among the ones used in the past.

Profile now gone.

Online scutty brown

first profile went because I reported it as fake.
Second profile was almost certainly picked up by AW as a clone and so deleted.