Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Escorts with no feedback?  (Read 1309 times)

Offline PussyLover789

Hey guys, i just wonderd if any of you guys book escorts with no feedback? ive put a booking request in & i did state in my notes that girls who have less than 3 positive feedbacks will not be seen, well this woman has 1 positive feedback, she sent an email saying shes quite happy to turn up at my hotel without a booking request to prove shes genuine & quite happy for us to have a chat on the phone, i dont want to say who the girl is & she looks quite nice and she does have the "verified Member" symbol, i know we all have to start somewhere, but wonderd what you guys thought, should i give her the benefit of the doubt??

Offline RedKettle

Hey guys, i just wonderd if any of you guys book escorts with no feedback? ive put a booking request in & i did state in my notes that girls who have less than 3 positive feedbacks will not be seen, well this woman has 1 positive feedback, she sent an email saying shes quite happy to turn up at my hotel without a booking request to prove shes genuine & quite happy for us to have a chat on the phone, i dont want to say who the girl is & she looks quite nice and she does have the "verified Member" symbol, i know we all have to start somewhere, but wonderd what you guys thought, should i give her the benefit of the doubt??

I assume you mean AW feedback?  In which case I am not really bothered whether any or loads, it is usually bollocks.  If they have been active on AW for ages and none then it is a factor but no more.  If they are hiding feedback that is a bigger factor.

For me the gold standard is whether they have reviews or discussion on UKP - if none then I do a careful assessment of their profile and probably ask a question on here about them.  No UKP review is the real issue. 

Offline PussyLover789

Thanx, ive checked her name on here and she has no reviews on here only 1 on adultwork, so i will post in the yorkshire area later if anyone has seen her

Offline Jeff_withpetersen

I don't think I'd go meet someone with so little feedback at a place of their choosing even though yes everyone does have to start somewhere - but as it's an outcall to a room you've hired and will have control of, I think you'd be alright. Being a verified member, being willing to turn up without a booking request and being happy to chat on the phone first are all good signs as well.

Offline Mr_Shins

There are various WGs who have a profile on AdultWork but don't generally use it to take booking requests. I have found you message them and they don't reply, often don't read the message etc. They expect you to contact them using their phone.

They may have been reviewed here. But even then you can't rely on them not having had a profile-swap with someone else.

I guess though everyone has to start somewhere. You can TOFTT.




Redhead Lover

  • Guest
she sent an email saying shes quite happy to turn up at my hotel without a booking request to prove shes genuine

I'd probably want that the other way around - IE turn up at her place/hotel. Then at least if she's not per her profile, you can make your excuses and walk. Could be a bit difficult if she's already in your hotel room!

JV547845

  • Guest
I've chanced it a few times - AW feedback is unreliable anyway unless you bother to check it's from real punters.  I'd try to phone them or exchange messages first, just as if anything it's not worth wasting my time on a PGS / bait and switch.

Offline Sheer Tights

I"ve had bad punts with well reviewed girls and good punts with girls with no feedback. My view is that if the girl sounds genuine on the phone, looks good in the veri pic and is not Romanian then I will chance it.

Offline EricJ

If she is Romanian then no. If other I might chance it.

oring123

  • Guest
highly photoshopped wgs photos
 normally do not work out too well

Offline smiths

I assume you mean AW feedback?  In which case I am not really bothered whether any or loads, it is usually bollocks.  If they have been active on AW for ages and none then it is a factor but no more.  If they are hiding feedback that is a bigger factor.

For me the gold standard is whether they have reviews or discussion on UKP - if none then I do a careful assessment of their profile and probably ask a question on here about them.  No UKP review is the real issue.

I agree in the main. I view ALL A/W feedback as bollocks unless I know the punter who has left it, it has more holes in it than a string vest and is open to so much abuse as to be totally worthless to me. And that's from using A/W as a location tool for years.

UKP is obviously far more reliable and its here which is the place to look for WGs to punt with or avoid. Sometimes I go off piste and punt with someone with no FB, sometimes it works out and the WG is a gem, sometimes it doesn't but I am prepared to take that risk ready to walk if necessary.

On A/W some WGs work only or mainly off their phones which is why they have little or no FB, and some have had the same months later.