Author Topic: Lovely Lulu (at the time in Kingston, now Green Park I believe)  (Read 3189 times)


13 review(s) for lovely lulu (9 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline sumo75

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Another retrospective review, on Lulu who I saw in Kingston at the time.  Thanks to collector, I'm putting up a non-fluffy review that doesn't sound like touting.

Initially put off by communications, because the voice sounded quite old and deep on the phone, triggering alerts of someone being trafficked. However, seeing as I was at the door of the apartment block, I called again and was ushered in, so unless someone had some binoculars on me, it might well have been Lulu.  I don't know. 

Anyway, photos in her link are 100% accurate.  She's naturally very very pretty, and she's fairly slim.  Definitely not fat, but not rake thin either.  The only slightest disappointment was, as I am a massive breast fiend, is that hers were not on the money.  I love women with 10/10 breasts, and hers were more of a 7/10 for me. 
She is an ok masseuse, and worked hard on me.  Perhaps not qualified, but a good enough routine with firm pressure.  It was adequate enough.  Her oily body massage felt really good though, especially as I could feel her nipples over my body.
She then proceeded to put a condom on, and performed OW, which I should have checked, as she doesn't list OWO on her menu........and then got on top.  My soldier wasn't working very well, though, and despite her eagerness to please me, she finished me off by hand instead.  With time left on the clock, we spent a bit of time cuddling, exploring, and generally chatting and making each laugh.  Her English was so-so, about average for most Asian WG's that I've come across.  Enough to get by in any case. 

Having thought about it, I would go and see her again, but lack of OWO tends to put me off, and I'm not pushy, so it was a completely vanilla service.  But, she has a very willing nature, as she really seemed eager to get me aroused and ensure that I had a good time, which I don't find with all girls.  That willingness to give a good service within her boundaries, plus her very pretty face makes me think that I would see her again though. 

Offline nervyfooker

£140 an hour,no kissing listed and no owo...
price too high for lack of services even if pretty.

Offline collector

Another good review, thanks for that. However I agree with nervyfooker, I'll pass with this one because the limited service.

Offline kenlovesspaniard

I see you found "Stacy", I have seen her before and it was a decent experience. Definitely one of the most beautiful oriental wg I have punted with.

I think I will be visiting her soon, cheers for the find.


p.s

My previous session with her, went back and they replaced her
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=53259.0

Offline collector

I see you found "Stacy", I have seen her before and it was a decent experience. Definitely one of the most beautiful oriental wg I have punted with.

I think I will be visiting her soon, cheers for the find.


p.s

My previous session with her, went back and they replaced her
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=53259.0
You mean Stacy and Lulu are the same prossie?
If yes, could you also found out by the description if the other 3 reviews belong to the same prossie you've seen?

Offline kenlovesspaniard

You mean Stacy and Lulu are the same prossie?
If yes, could you also found out by the description if the other 3 reviews belong to the same prossie you've seen?


I can definitely confirm that I visited her (Lulu) earlier last year, when she was still Stacy.

Stacy is now a different girl, and I can only confirm my own sessions so no idea about others.

Offline collector


I can definitely confirm that I visited her (Lulu) earlier last year, when she was still Stacy.

Stacy is now a different girl, and I can only confirm my own sessions so no idea about others.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=4287 I think the first 3 are about Lulu, the 4th and last one belongs to the current owner, stacey.wong.

naterb

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Just as an addendum, current Lulu denies being Stacy or knowing who that is and also claims to be independent which I think is a lie. Also her prices can be lower than on AW depending on what you want.