Kiss me katie xxxxx - Colchester

[oohermrs]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Saw Katie this afternoon for a 30 min session.

Comms/organisationally - a bit chaotic.  To be fair to Katie, she'd only just returned from some time away, so things weren't quite squared away at the flat.

Katie's a nice girl, who's easy to get on with.  No reason to disbelieve her age on her profile.  Attractive and curvy.  Bigger then her photos suggest - I'd have to agree with Talbear here, nearer a size 16/18 rather than a 12/14 and clear signs of motherhood.  That's fine with me, but may be a showstopper for others.

From the off, Katie was clear she didn't do DFK.  We started out with some OWO, which was absolutely superb (and DT).  After a bit of that, it was on with the protection and straight into mish.  Pounded away at that for a bit with a fair amount of encouragement from Katie.  Decided I wanted to finish in her mouth, so back to some more of that superb OWO.  Unfortunately, a CIM didn't happen and she steered my pop over her tits instead 

Quick mop-up and chat afterwards.  The subject of this forum came up - suffice to say, she's not a fan of the website.  You're all a bunch of big, bad, nasties.   

Except me, of course, I'm brill.   

[ramrodronnie]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Saw Katie this afternoon for a 30 min session.

Comms/organisationally - a bit chaotic.  To be fair to Katie, she'd only just returned from some time away, so things weren't quite squared away at the flat.

Katie's a nice girl, who's easy to get on with.  No reason to disbelieve her age on her profile.  Attractive and curvy.  Bigger then her photos suggest - I'd have to agree with Talbear here, nearer a size 16/18 rather than a 12/14 and clear signs of motherhood.  That's fine with me, but may be a showstopper for others.

From the off, Katie was clear she didn't do DFK.  We started out with some OWO, which was absolutely superb (and DT).  After a bit of that, it was on with the protection and straight into mish.  Pounded away at that for a bit with a fair amount of encouragement from Katie.  Decided I wanted to finish in her mouth, so back to some more of that superb OWO.  Unfortunately, a CIM didn't happen and she steered my pop over her tits instead 

Quick mop-up and chat afterwards.  The subject of this forum came up - suffice to say, she's not a fan of the website.  You're all a bunch of big, bad, nasties.   

Except me, of course, I'm brill.   

Thanks for the Review oohermrs. Pleased you had a good punt with Kate. But unfortunately she's not one that I would personally go for. If that makes me a big bad nasty? Well then "I'm a Big Bad Nasty" 

Each to their own as the old saying goes oohermrs. It wouldn't do if we were all to like the same. 

[oohermrs]

No mate, you've misunderstood - it was Katie's view that the folks on here are all big, bad nasties.  Not mine!

[ramrodronnie]

No mate, you've misunderstood - it was Katie's view that the folks on here are all big, bad nasties.  Not mine!

I know oohermrs. It was her remark that I was referring to. I didn't misunderstand you.

[socks]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Unfortunately, a CIM didn't happen and she steered my pop over her tits instead 

Do you mean you couldn't get the gates to your ball bag to burst open whilst being orally pleasured by Katie, so you opted to wank off over her tits? Or did she do the dirty and bottle out of swallowing your baby gravy at the last second, spraying your appreciation over her funbags instead?

[oohermrs]

Sadly, the latter.  It was well done, but it slightly took the shine off what was otherwise a pretty decent punt.

My search continues...

[socks]

Sadly, the latter.  It was well done, but it slightly took the shine off what was otherwise a pretty decent punt.

My search continues...

I hate it when that happens. I've no problem with girls who are up front about it but those with it on their profiles - even her with the at discretion bit, should tell you if it's not gonna happen before you pay. Could never be a positive for me if that was the ending you'd hoped for. And she's the one who's got a problem with our forum!!! Perhaps the truth hurts....?

It's easy, describe yourself as you are, do what you promise, be honest about what you won't do, be clean, be enthusiastic, earn your very, very decent hourly rate and you'll find this forum and its members are the best thing possible for your business.

[ramrodronnie]

I hate it when that happens. I've no problem with girls who are up front about it but those with it on their profiles - even her with the at discretion bit, should tell you if it's not gonna happen before you pay. Could never be a positive for me if that was the ending you'd hoped for. And she's the one who's got a problem with our forum!!! Perhaps the truth hurts....?

It's easy, describe yourself as you are, do what you promise, be honest about what you won't do, be clean, be enthusiastic, earn your very, very decent hourly rate and you'll find this forum and its members are the best thing possible for your business.

Well said socks. I couldn't have put it better myself. When any WG puts services on their profiles, they should deliver what they list, so long as the punter is nice, clean, and respectful, there should be no reason for not delivering.
That may well be why she's calling us a bunch of nasty's, as the truth always hurts.

[oohermrs]

Socks - agree with you in principle, but the reality can be different.

For example, samcrow1's review of Katie clearly states she does good owo, a cim finish and a swallow.  I didn't get the cim+s.  In addition, if you have a look back at my reviews, I did one for Lush Lola recently.  At that meeting, Lola did a cum dodge on me and I didn't get a cim finish with her either.  The experiences of RRR and mrsx007 seemed to be very different.

What's going on?  Maybe it's because I look like Quasi Modo or I didn't quite click with either of them - I don't know...It's disappointing because I take the time to do my research and read all the reviews etc and make my decision based on that.

So, not only do we have variability between what a profile says a girl does and what she does in the session, but there also seems to be some variability in the services provided by the same girl to different punters.  Finding that ronseal girl is the issue...

Having said all of the above, I still think both meetings were positive, but I'm unlikely to return to either as I like my cim finishes.

[sxman]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Saw Katie this afternoon for a 30 min session.

Comms/organisationally - a bit chaotic.  To be fair to Katie, she'd only just returned from some time away, so things weren't quite squared away at the flat.

Katie's a nice girl, who's easy to get on with.  No reason to disbelieve her age on her profile.  Attractive and curvy.  Bigger then her photos suggest - I'd have to agree with Talbear here, nearer a size 16/18 rather than a 12/14 and clear signs of motherhood.  That's fine with me, but may be a showstopper for others.

From the off, Katie was clear she didn't do DFK.  We started out with some OWO, which was absolutely superb (and DT).  After a bit of that, it was on with the protection and straight into mish.  Pounded away at that for a bit with a fair amount of encouragement from Katie.  Decided I wanted to finish in her mouth, so back to some more of that superb OWO.  Unfortunately, a CIM didn't happen and she steered my pop over her tits instead 

Quick mop-up and chat afterwards.  The subject of this forum came up - suffice to say, she's not a fan of the website.  You're all a bunch of big, bad, nasties.   

Except me, of course, I'm brill.   

If she was clear on NO DFK, why is she listing french kissing at discretion.

Just out of curiosity who brought up the ukp site up in conversation, when I read that someone has talked about UKP in the punt I wonder if it clouds the punters judgement on the outcome of review, giving a positive instead of a neutral perhaps, Im not saying its happened in this case, but it makes me feel uneasy when punters talk to WG's about the site as I believe it will be slagging of members they don't like to fluffy's, which can lead to all sorts of trouble. Im not saying this is you oohermrs so don't be offended, its just my opinion.

[oohermrs]

It's a fair point, sxman.

First of all, this was after the punt and as I was on my way out.  Katie asked me why I had chosen her as opposed to anyone else (haven't been asked this many times).  I told her because I'd read a positive review of her.  She asked where and I told her on UKP. That's when she told me what she thought of the site and the comments on here. I told her I may not be able to defend all the comments made on here, but the forum provided a valuable service to punters who want/need a fair assessment of WGs and the service they provide.  Whilst she accepted this, I don't think I changed her opinion that much! 

[ramrodronnie]

It's a fair point, sxman.

First of all, this was after the punt and as I was on my way out.  Katie asked me why I had chosen her as opposed to anyone else (haven't been asked this many times).  I told her because I'd read a positive review of her.  She asked where and I told her on UKP. That's when she told me what she thought of the site and the comments on here. I told her I may not be able to defend all the comments made on here, but the forum provided a valuable service to punters who want/need a fair assessment of WGs and the service they provide.  Whilst she accepted this, I don't think I changed her opinion that much!

I don't think that you will change her opinion oohermrs. As I stated above, if any WG doesn't provide the services that she has advertised, and we have paid to receive those services, then we have every right to highlight  it on this site, to warn other punters. This is why not just Kate, but any WG who doesn't deliver on their advertised services don't like this site, and IMO that's why Kate is calling us all a bunch of nasty's.

As said; "The Truth Hurts"

[Hackneylad1]

This just goes to show how subjective reviews are on even this site.
I gave a neutral to one just because the house smelt of smoke and she
was smoking when i arrived.

Here we have one who lies about her size and the services. Pulling out
of CIM is a real downer yet she gets a positive review.

[ramrodronnie]

This just goes to show how subjective reviews are on even this site.
I gave a neutral to one just because the house smelt of smoke and she
was smoking when i arrived.

Here we have one who lies about her size and the services. Pulling out
of CIM is a real downer yet she gets a positive review.

Reviews will always be subjective Hackneylad1. As one punters experience, and expectations are different. But essentially as I've stated above. If any WG advertises services, then she should deliver on those services that we as punters who are paying for those services.
If a punter still gives a WG a Positive Review even though the WG hasn't delivered on her advertised services? Then that's his opinion. But we can make our own minds up based on the Review, if we can see after reading a Review the WG hasn't delivered as advertised.

[Karloff44]

AW think she might be suspect ?

[ramrodronnie]

AW think she might be suspect ?

I can see that she's got a red alert at the top of her profile Karloff44. Plenty of WGs have those. It doesn't always mean they're not kosher, admittedly I, like many other punters tend to be sceptical when we see these red alerts. Best watched I think.

[Karloff44]

Yeah best to be careful.

[socks]

AW think she might be suspect ?

AW alert system is a load of bollocks, so don't hold that against anyone with it. If anything fair play to Katie on that score for not supplying them with whatever irrelevant bollocks it is they are after. "The authenticity or legitimacy of this member's profile has been brought into question. Please exercise caution." What a load of shite, more like the escort in question said "you can stick requiring an HD picture of me holding my passport or driver's license for all to read its detail, up your arse". If you click on the notes option next to their message it promises to remove the profile within 48 hours if the prossie doesn't comply. Yeah right.

[Karloff44]

Why wouldn't she do that it's not a lot too ask ?

[Karloff44]

What if it was the other way around ?

[socks]

Fair point. I'd be more than happy to link my personal details, alongside a face photo, on a prostitution website, for all the world to see, forever.  That said, there are plenty that do

[ramrodronnie]

Fair point. I'd be more than happy to link my personal details, alongside a face photo, on a prostitution website, for all the world to see, forever.  That said, there are plenty that do

Most of us clued up punters know that the AW verification system is pretty crap socks. Unfortunately at the moment it appears it's the best  of the worst out there.

[vw]

AW alert system is a load of bollocks, so don't hold that against anyone with it. If anything fair play to Katie on that score for not supplying them with whatever irrelevant bollocks it is they are after. "The authenticity or legitimacy of this member's profile has been brought into question. Please exercise caution." What a load of shite, more like the escort in question said "you can stick requiring an HD picture of me holding my passport or driver's license for all to read its detail, up your arse". If you click on the notes option next to their message it promises to remove the profile within 48 hours if the prossie doesn't comply. Yeah right.

Nor me it just means they wont jump through AW hoops, most of my best punts had an alert at the time.  Its a good things in my eyes keeps the cotton wool wrapped punters (That usually are fanboys and white knights in the end) out of the queue making them easier to book !

Many British prossies don;t drive or haven't been abroad so stuck in this constant state of warning !

[Hunghertsguy]

2 points here.
Both the best girls in my area (jenny and maja) had the AW warning at one time or another so treat it with a bit of common sense and use your own judgement.

Second - the lists of what the girls 'offer' are listed as 'enjoys' and not 'guaranteed services'.
I love RO but wouldn't go down on a skanky fanny - if one of these girls profiles says OWO then gets on her knees and finds a bell end covered in yesterday's knob cheese its no surprise if she shys away - same if you stink like an ash tray or have a set of teeth that look like they havent seen a tube of colgate in months. FFS all you have to do is ask up front about services if you are worried. Just because its on the menu dont mean its in stock.

[socks]

The menu/what's in stock is a decent analogy, just that in a restaurant you pay once you have received, allowing you to pick and choose as you go. Be interesting to have a punt on those lines..

"Could I see the starters menu and borrow your calculator...right I think I'll begin with the lapdance, dfk and mutual rimming please, for main we'll be doing mish and doggy and seeing as anal is on the specials board today, could you throw a little of that in. Finish that off with a cim/facial combo. I'll check out the desserts, while you clear up my spunk.

"Yes that's fine only I've got no dfk today. I can let you have some complimentary lip to lip with gentle tongue touching instead...

etc

[vw]

The menu/what's in stock is a decent analogy, just that in a restaurant you pay once you have received, allowing you to pick and choose as you go. Be interesting to have a punt on those lines..

"Could I see the starters menu and borrow your calculator...right I think I'll begin with the lapdance, dfk and mutual rimming please, for main we'll be doing mish and doggy and seeing as anal is on the specials board today, could you throw a little of that in. Finish that off with a cim/facial combo. I'll check out the desserts, while you clear up my spunk.

"Yes that's fine only I've got no dfk today. I can let you have some complimentary lip to lip with gentle tongue touching instead...

etc

 

And no tip !   

[socks]

And no tip !   

Instead the only tipping going on should be gentle flicking of her tongue on my shiny bellend.

[ramrodronnie]

2 points here.
Both the best girls in my area (jenny and maja) had the AW warning at one time or another so treat it with a bit of common sense and use your own judgement.

Second - the lists of what the girls 'offer' are listed as 'enjoys' and not 'guaranteed services'.
I love RO but wouldn't go down on a skanky fanny - if one of these girls profiles says OWO then gets on her knees and finds a bell end covered in yesterday's knob cheese its no surprise if she shys away - same if you stink like an ash tray or have a set of teeth that look like they havent seen a tube of colgate in months. FFS all you have to do is ask up front about services if you are worried. Just because its on the menu dont mean its in stock.


+1 Hunghertsguy

[ramrodronnie]

The menu/what's in stock is a decent analogy, just that in a restaurant you pay once you have received, allowing you to pick and choose as you go. Be interesting to have a punt on those lines..

"Could I see the starters menu and borrow your calculator...right I think I'll begin with the lapdance, dfk and mutual rimming please, for main we'll be doing mish and doggy and seeing as anal is on the specials board today, could you throw a little of that in. Finish that off with a cim/facial combo. I'll check out the desserts, while you clear up my spunk.

"Yes that's fine only I've got no dfk today. I can let you have some complimentary lip to lip with gentle tongue touching instead...

etc

  Funny, but good analogy socks.